The girl who couldn’t talk straight

To paraphrase Maurice Chevalier, thank heaven (Barack does) for little girls (as in go-girl), little (not real little) Afro-American girls like Mary Mitchell, who can come to the aid of their Afr-Am heroines, getting them out of hot water.

I  understood exactly what Michelle Obama meant when she expressed a renewed pride in America. Look at what’s happening.

Michelle committed a hugely self-revealing boo-boo born of some sort of frustration, digging deep in her psyche for her undifferentiated angst about being you know what in America, but to the rescue came Mary, not only columnizing but commandeering the entire multi-color front page of the splashiest newspaper west of the New York Post.

Michelle: I’ve always been proud of U.S.

PRIDE IN AMERICA | No reason to apologize — she had it right the first time

Go girls!

Snowbound but unbowed

In today’s Wednesday Journal of OP & RF:

Do Whittier students know he crusaded against slavery? John Greenleaf Whittier, that is, namesake of the Oak Park school across from the Dole Branch? He was a friend of the abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison, who published him for the first time, in 1826, when Whittier was 19.

Do they know he wrote “Snowbound,” his 1860s poem featuring his parents, his brother and two sisters, bachelor uncle and unmarried aunt, and the local school teacher, who boarded with them?

I hope so. I hope they memorize it or some of its 759 lines, for reciting in February, especially this one, when it is specially appropriate.

And more more more about poetry as

what we want for our boys and girls, what fires the imagination, insulates them against the brittle plasticity of popular culture.  . . .  a firewall of the poetic.  None should leave school without one.

============

UPDATE:  Reader Who Remembers has this to say in an email:

You bring back memories of 1st year at Mercy High School and Sister Hyacinth (6 feet tall with a face like Lewis Stone [Judge Hardy, Andy’s pere]). On the occasion of the first snowfall of the year, she brought out this poem by James Russell Lowell, and we were told to memorize it and recite it — we went over it that day — I memorized it and can recite most of it by memory still today — phrases like “Came Chanticleer‘s muffled crow” we learned a different name for rooster! And I probably had never known what “Carrara” was, before this poem. The beauty of language: snow as “ermine.” And every first snowfall, the poem comes to mind, and I see that classroom on Prairie Avenue, with all the girls in their navy blue uniforms, moaning silently because of the assignment.

The complete Lowell poem:

“The First Snowfall” by James Russell Lowell

The snow had begun in the gloaming,
And busily all the night
Had been heaping field and highway
With a silence deep and white.

Every pine and fir and hemlock
Wore ermine too dear for an earl,
And the poorest twig on the elm-tree
Was ridged inch deep with pearl.

From sheds new-roofed with Carrara
Came Chanticleer‘s muffled crow,
The stiff rails were softened to swan’s-down,
And still fluttered down the snow.

I stood and watched by the window
The noiseless work of the sky,
And the sudden flurries of snow-birds,
Like brown leaves whirling by.

I thought of a mound in sweet Auburn
Where a little headstone stood;
How the flakes were folding it gently,
As did robins the babes in the wood.

Up spoke our own little Mabel,
Saying, “Father, who makes it snow?”
And I told of the good All-father
Who cares for us here below.

Again I looked at the snow-fall,
And thought of the leaden sky
That arched o’er our first great sorrow,
When that mound was heaped so high.

I remembered the gradual patience
That fell from that cloud-like snow,
Flake by flake, healing and hiding
The scar of our deep-plunged woe.

And again to the child I whispered,
“The snow that husheth all,
Darling, the merciful Father
Alone can make it fall!”

Then, with eyes that saw not, I kissed her;
And she, kissing back, could not know
That my kiss was given to her sister,
Folded close under deepening snow.

UPDATE 2:  The Whittier and Lowell snow poems are paired in a McDougal Littell textbook, in a section on “the Fireside Poets.”  From an ML editor:

The latter poem describes the first snowfall on the grave of a child taken by illness. The pairing offers nice opportunity for comparison and contrast of snow imagery, as you might imagine. Nice poems, both.

Writers alert: big noises in Winnetka and elsewhere

Oh to be in Winnetka, now that Cynthia’s there signing her book:

Come out to say hello and support Cynthia Clampitt when she talks about her book, Waltzing Australia, and does a signing, 7 p.m., Tuesday, March 4 at Chestnut Court’s Book Stall, 811 Elm St., Winnetka, 847-446-8880.

says Midwest free-lancers’ last, best hope, Midwest Writers Association.  Ditto Wilmette, where another MWA member, Helen Gallagher,

 

author of Release Your Writing: Book Publishing Your Way, will present “Your book is being published: Now what?” about marketing a book through retail outlets, book clubs, and online resources. She will also discuss other marketing strategies.

That’s at 7 p.m. Thursday, April 3 at the Wilmette Library, 1242 Wilmette Avenue. Cost: $5. Call the library for directions at 847/256-5025. E-mail your RSVP to Jodie Jacobs.

And there’s “The New Media,” at the next Illinois Women’s Press Association breakfast, 10 a.m. Saturday April 19, downtown Chicago, 2nd floor of the Chicago Methodist Temple, 77 W. Washington St., across from Daley Plaza, where Northwestern U.’s

Medill Graduate School Director Janice Castro, a former long-time Time-Warner reporter and web-site developer, will talk on the changing world of today’s media so we can better understand how to continue working as writers, editors, communications experts. IWPA Members, full time students and guests $15; Nonmembers $25; cash or check at the door; RSVP to 312/458-9151 or e-mail iwpa@comcast.net

Info cheerily provided by MWA website manager Jim Bowman at www.midwestwriters.com — check it out.

Obama appeal

INSPIRED BY CHANGE MAYBE? — An Oak Park letter writer has warmed globally to Sen. Obama as reminiscent of JFK almost 50 years ago with his stirring “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.” But O’s message is just the opposite, consisting entirely about what your country should do for you, though admittedly details are vague even about this.

In any case he calls for no burst of generosity, as of Peace Corps commitment or embrace of national defense vs. our cold-war enemy the Soviet Union. Instead he would have us rally ‘round the flag of statism and dependence on government. He captures support by his looks and demeanor, not by any call to arms or service, except vaguely in a Rodney King-like plea to get along.

With all respect, isn’t this the Democrat way? When Democrat candidates gathered together at the Oak Park Library during primary season two years ago, they talked government aid, in sharp contrast with Republicans a few weeks earlier, who talked job creation through entrepreneurship.

For the Dems the cause of the moment was job training by a government agency — old-time Democrat religion of government aid. For the Republicans it was about tax relief and other diminutions of government activity — a far cry from asking what government can do for us.

Do we dare think it?

If you have dared in your heart of hearts to wonder what if a student had plugged the maniac on stage at NIU with his legally concealed Luger, Ruger, or what-not, know that you are not alone:

Even before a gunman killed five people and injured several others in a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University, a small but growing movement had been under way at universities and state legislatures to allow students, faculty and staff to carry guns on campus.

Twelve states are considering bills that would allow people with concealed-weapons permits to carry guns at public universities. The efforts were sparked by the Virginia Tech massacre last April.

Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, an Internet-based organization with 11,000 members in its Facebook group, is calling attention to the issue with a protest from April 21 to 25, a week after the one-year anniversary of the shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16.

Are we really satisfied with our policy of restricting weapons?  Or is NIU another instance of its abject failure?

Update:  Reader D. notes this in the above linked story:  

Samaha [whose younger sister, Reema, was killed at Virginia Tech] says guns on campus are a risk in an environment where young people drink and fight and are not always able to control their emotions.
and adds this: 
I think the way to get around this possibility is to temporarily “deputize” certain students who pass a rigid test. And maybe there should be some prohibition about drinking for those allowed to conceal carry.
 
In both these college cases, it seems the shooter came in blazing — but the reloading part would have been a good moment to get him.
 
Also not knowing how many or who the “deputies” are on a campus, just public knowledge that they are there, might cause a gunman to choose a different campus.
 
AND, the “deputy” would have to be presumed acting in the line of duty if he unloads on the shooter, so the family doesn’t sue him/her for unlawful use of a weapon, etc. after the fact. 
 
The rest of the students have to respect the fact the deputy is there to protect [them], and not try to “out” him or steal his weapon for a joke, or provoke him, or pretend to be a terrorist, etc. as we know class clowns are wont to do, especially after a 12-pack.
 
It would give some peace of mind to students on certain campuses and might even draw attendance to such colleges. All in all, it is devastating to parents who thought all they had to worry about was pregnancy or drunk driving.
Yes, depends on how great the threat they perceive and how willing to take or tolerate admittedly harsh measures.  In any case, the question remains: how well do present gun-restrictive measures work?  And may we talk about that?

Barree, Barree . . .

Is this David Axelrod’s idea, for women to swoon and Barack to toss them bottles?

There seems to be a trend at Obama rallies … women fainting. And interestingly enough the Senator responds the same way every time, almost as if … naah, couldn’t be.

Connecticut DJ Jim Vicevich did some research.  In Hartford, New Hampshire, Seattle, LA, and Madison, the emotion of the moment overwhelmed them.

when a woman appeared to faint in the standing-only VIP section in front of the podium, Obama paused his speech for over a minute as he directed the crowd to make way for an EMT team and tossed a bottle of water from the stage.

In New Hampshire he reached beneath the podium top, found a bottle, and handed it to someone before they wheeled the woman out on a gurney.

Climate change, the Iraq war and Obama tossing a bottle of water to a woman about to faint all received big cheers [in Seattle]. As Obama told the crowd to part so that the woman in question could leave and called for help, a young girl in the crowd shouted out, “What a man!”
 
The audience roared with laughter (although the press that has seen this happen before rolled its eyes).

In LA:

A woman standing in front of the stage appeared to faint as Obama spoke about Iraq. The candidate paused and asked the crowd to make way for firefighters.One supporter shouted, “You’re a good man,” leaving Obama momentarily at a loss for words.”Well, I’m not the only one stopping to help her,” he said, sounding almost embarrassed.

Before he even got to the Madison crowd,

students were tossing around an inflatable cow above the crowd. Three people fainted in the midst of all the enthusiasm.

“This could be a really swell game,” commented the DJ.  “Count the number of people on the campaign overcome by the “vapas”.

James Taranto was more serious about it:

What exactly are we to make of this? A cynic might wonder if the whole thing isn’t staged, given how often it happens and how well-honed and self-serving Obama’s standard response seems to be.

But if it’s spontaneous, that’s in a way even more unsettling. . . . . 

Obama has a talent for eliciting intense emotion–an ability that can be dangerous in a politician. What more does he have to offer? That’s a hard question to answer . . .

And he could be The Man.

 

Letter from Dick

In further Adventures of the Ed Page at Chi Trib, we see or may surmise that State’s Attorney Dick Devine went for top billing for an op-ed with this, beginning thus:

In recent weeks the Tribune has mentioned prosecutorial “misconduct” in its editorial pages. This is a term that grabs the public’s attention, so it is important that the efforts of our office on this issue be stated.

Nothing doing, as the world turned.  Instead, unlike Mayor Daley yesterday and Congr. Jesse Jackson Jr. the day before, he is awarded no such encomium.  His Voice of the People contribution, on the other hand, is a mere letter, albeit the lede.

No surprise there.  He’s county, neither city nor congressional district, and lame duck besides.

Substantively speaking, he offers this as part of his defense of his office, recently criticized in a primary campaign and already criticized in the general:

Our office handles 70,000 felonies and more than 200,000 misdemeanor cases each year.  . . . .   In 2007, the last year for which full numbers are available, the appellate courts in Illinois heard a number of appeals from guilty verdicts in Cook County. Our examination of the public record shows that of those appeals, only four even mention prosecutorial error and only one was sent back to the trial courts for reconsideration based on that error.

And if Tony Petraica has something to say about that, he can write a letter too.

Condi for veep

This is for starters in Nicholas von Hoffman’s case for Condoleezza Rice as John McCain’s running mate:

McCain’s troubles with the religious wing of his party could well evaporate with the churchgoing Rice at his side. She solidifies that part of his base overnight.

Republicans love her.  (Who says they love McCain?)  She’s a killer debater.  She’s a “superstar” and “a fancy dresser.”  She trumps Dems on diversity.  As pro-war, she goes well with McCain.  She’s cover for sexist and racist accusations when going after either O. or H.C.  Her experience went beyond being someone’s wife.

They can challenge [H.C.’s] boast that she is a strong, independent woman and paint her as a weak, hopelessly-in-love woman under the spell of a man subject not only to “bimbo eruptions” but also eruptions of smarmy deals with shady business figures.

Wait.  They wouldn’t do that, would they?

Lastly, Rice is a notorious sports fan with excruciatingly detailed knowledge of much of its arcana. She’s often said that her dream job is commissioner of the National Football League; however, in a pinch she would probably settle for Vice President of the United States.

Now that’s the Nick von Hoffman who once hit non-softball home runs for the Chicago Daily News.

==============

Update: Reader D. is having none of it:

The guy who wrote that article was a real nimrod. What’s the next worst entity in our country after sleeper cells and liberals? The State Department! Condoleezza has NOT changed State, she’s blended right in. She’s horrible. No self-respecting [citizen] would ever vote for her. She has the ear of Bush and she whispers sweet nothings that aren’t sweet. Plus I don’t like her voice. She always sounds like she’s ready to break down and cry. I thought we had put this pipe dream to sleep.
Any more Rice fans out there?

Does the mayor deserve this space?

Chi Trib is at it again, 2nd day in a row, surrendering top-billed op-ed space (hard-copy: it’s buried on the web site) to a politician blowing his own horn:

Property tax bills went out across Chicago last week, and homeowners are rightly concerned. They’re seeing the evidence that our property tax assessment system is broken and needs to be reformed.

The increases in property tax bills are due largely to higher assessments determined by the Cook County assessor, not a tax increase by the City of Chicago.

That’s the mayor speaking or writing, but who thinks he wrote it?  And why, if he can be so calm and lucid, doesn’t he talk that way?

Again, we have perhaps a standing practice, in its best light encouraging op-ed dueling.  But if that’s it, then give equal space, equally billed, to that highly suspect Cook County assessor.  He is mentioned, yes:

I am asking Cook County Assessor James Houlihan to correct the assessed values of homes in Chicago’s hardest-hit neighborhoods. These are neighborhoods where home values increased the most as a result of the 2006 assessment and have decreased in the current economic downturn.

But of course, this being commentary not news — that Daley’s saying this about a political enemy — no reporter seeks rebuttal.  This is political infighting, but without opposition. 

And Houlihan would write his own, I’ll bet.  Speaking to a small group in Oak Park a few years back, he was calm and lucid.  Wouldn’t it be nice to see him cheek by jowl with the mayor on the Trib’s op-ed page?