Jesus laid down the law called for loving enemies and what comes from doing so . . .

Plus what a Jesuit poet did to handle the challenge . . .

In Luke 6:27-38, today’s gospel reading, leaving about as much room as a “shalt not kill”:

To you who hear, I say love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. To the person who strikes you on one cheek, offer the other one as well, and from the person who takes your cloak, do not withhold even your tunic. Give to everyone who asks of you, and from the one who takes what is yours do not demand it back.

Hard words. He continues:

Do to others as you would have them do to you.
For if you love those who love you,
what credit is that to you?
Even sinners love those who love them.
And if you do good to those who do good to you,
what credit is that to you?
Even sinners do the same.

He further explains, sounding more like a Sunday preacher.

Samples:

If you lend money to those from whom you expect repayment,
what credit is that to you?

Happens every day, of course! Sinners do it, right? “Lend expecting nothing back?” Not quite . . .

But rather, love your enemies and do good to them,
and ;
then your reward will be great
and you will be children of the Most High,
for he himself is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked.
Be merciful, just as also your Father is merciful.

Glory be to God Ah, of course. Yet more as the speaking continues . . .

“Stop judging and you will not be judged.
Stop condemning and you will not be condemned.
Forgive and you will be forgiven.

Sweet Jesus! Reward on the spot, yes.

Give and gifts will be given to you;

Thank God!

a good measure, packed together, shaken down, and overflowing,
will be poured into your lap.
For the measure with which you measure
will in return be measured out to you.”

Oh my, what a message. If not here on earth, then in heaven. The essence of God being in heaven and, yes! All being right with the world!

Speaking of which, we might turn to the 19th-century Jesuit Gerard Manley Hopkins with cause to resent that he did not allow to take charge and found God already manifesting Himself in “dappled things” and “skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow.”

Pied Beauty

Glory be to God for dappled things—
For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow;
For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim;
Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches’ wings;
Landscape plotted and pieced—fold, fallow, and plough;
And all trades, their gear and tackle and trim.

All things counter, original, spare, strange;
Whatever is fickle, freckled (who knows how?)
With swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim;
He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change:
Praise Him.

Wandered a bit there . . .

CHURCH NEEDS MORE MASCULINE PRIESTS

https://www.catholicleague.org/church-needs-more-masculine-priests/

The assault on masculinity has been going on inside and outside of the Catholic Church for decades, but it is now at a fever pitch. To cite one recent example, in his February 21 article, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof blamed masculinity for the sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic and Southern Baptist Churches. The Southern Baptist Convention was recently investigated by reporters.

Kristof quotes Serene Jones, president of the Union Theological Society: “They [the two Churches] both have very masculine understandings of God, and have a structure where men are considered the closest representatives of God.”

Which in her view is a problem.

But why Southern Baptists?

Why did the Houston Chronicle and the San Antonio Express-News investigate the Southern Baptist Convention? There are several other Baptist denominations, so why the Southern Baptists? Alternatively, why didn’t they choose to probe the Episcopalians, Lutherans, Methodists, or Presbyterians?

Let me take a wild guess. It’s for the same reason the media, until now, have focused exclusively on the Catholic Church: both Churches are known for their orthodox Christian teachings on sexuality. If they can be discredited, their moral voice will be compromised. One would have to be ideologically blind not to see what’s going on.

and why ask Jones?

Why did Kristof tee it up for the president of the Union Theological Seminary? Because he knew she would feed his narrative. This New York-based institution has long been home to “progressive” thinkers, including dissident Catholic theologians (it has even employed those who have been banned from teaching at Catholic colleges due to their wholesale rejection of Catholicism).

World without end, a meditation . . .

Glory be to God, we say, more times than we can count. Of course we do. And we add, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, I mean Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

The beginning? Of time, that is. Time? What’s that? It’s what marches on. We count days. Before and after. In time, what started when God decided. He said let there be time and it happened.

Before that . . . It defies description. We know only what He has told us, what we can assume. Thing to remember is, God invented time. He never not existed, but always. There was never a beginning for him.

It adds to our awe, does it not? We go to church as believers focused not on ourselves as needy people but on Him who not only lives forever but never did not live. Everything flows from Him, this Lord and God of ours, to whom we owe everything.

So when we pray, we might act with that in mind. Make Him the focus of our attention. The world is at His disposal. He created earth and at the same time heaven, which is where we come in. He it is whom each of us can engage in conversation, i.e. prayer.

This puts prayer in a new light? For me it did. Along came the Son in creator garb, to complete the process. Blessed (by us) be God forever. We are blessed to return the favor.

Ideally. Falling short the best of us, them we call saints, many (most?) not recognized by the all too human ecclesia (church), our imperfect but mostly well-meaning vehicle — egad, current holy father is a Democrat!

So? Holy Fathers come and go, do they not? It’s the office we revere . . . The man with the name, Paul the midnight rider, for instance. “Listen my children and you shall hear . . .” the poet wrote . . . we listen, we pray . . .

Glory be to God and blessed are we all: Ezekiel again, passing on the God of love . . .

The forgiving God . . .

Thus says the LORD:
I will prove the holiness of my great name,
profaned among the nations,
in whose midst you have profaned it.

Oh.

Thus the nations shall know that I am the LORD, says the Lord GOD,
when in their sight I prove my holiness through you.
For I will take you away from among the nations,
gather you from all the foreign lands,
and bring you back to your own land.

Thanks to Him.

I will sprinkle clean water upon you
to cleanse you from all your impurities,
and from all your idols I will cleanse you.

Heavens!

I will give you a new heart and place a new spirit within you,
taking from your bodies your stony hearts
and giving you natural hearts.

Re-making us.

I will put my spirit within you and make you live by my statutes,
careful to observe my decrees.
You shall live in the land I gave your ancestors;
you shall be my people, and I will be your God.

!

Per Knox, offering perhaps new insights:

23 That great renown of mine I mean to vindicate, that is now dragged in the dust among the Gentiles, dragged in the dust because of you. The very Gentiles will recognize my power, the Lord God says, when I proclaim my majesty in their sight by delivering you.

[vv. 20-23. The suggestion is, not that the Israelites in exile brought disgrace on the true religion by their sinfulness, but that the heathen looked with contempt on a God who seemed unable to protect his votaries.]

24 I mean to set you free from the power of the Gentiles, bring you home again from every part of the earth.

25 And then I will pour cleansing streams over you, to purge you from every stain you bear, purge you from the taint of your idolatry.

26 I will give you a new heart, and breathe a new spirit into you; I will take away from your breasts those hearts that are hard as stone, and give you human hearts instead.

27 I will make my spirit penetrate you, so that you will follow in the path of my law, remember and carry out my decrees.

28 So shall you make your home in the land I promised to your fathers; you shall be my people, and I will be your God.

Thus God spoke to his people through His messenger.

Ezekiel the prophet brought bad news to God’s chosen but good too. Ditto Paul to the Romans, who told of Jesus the savior bringing life to our perishable bodies.

Ezekiel delivers the ultimate promise from God, quoting him:

12 Therefore prophesy, and say to them: Thus saith the Lord God: Behold I will open your graves, and will bring you out of your sepulchres, O my people: and will bring you into the land of Israel..

13 And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall have opened your sepulchres, and shall have brought you out of your graves, O my people:

Paul tells Romans the same thing:

11 And if the Spirit of him who raised up Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised up Jesus Christ from the dead will give life to your perishable bodies too, for the sake of his Spirit who dwells in you.

This is great news, to say the least. It solves the ultimate mystery. These two short (5th Sunday Lent, 3/9/08) passages lead to John’s long account of the raising of Lazarus.

He’s sick and not long for this world, or so people thought. Jesus decided to use him to make the Ezekiel point about graves opening — and to anticipate the Paul point about resurrection.

The body was in Judea, where they were laying for Jesus. “You’re sure you want to go back there?” his people asked him. He answered mysteriously about a twelve-hour day (of daylight, we presume) and stumbling in the dark, meaning let’s go before it’s dark.

There was the back-and-forth with the dead man’s sister, who unwittingly sets him up for his clinching argument, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die.”

He immediately puts it to her: “Do you believe this?” She can’t say yes fast enough. This was Martha, who got something of a bum rap earlier for getting tied up in housework when something big was happening — the biggest she would ever come up against. It was a mistake she wasn’t going to make twice.

She sends for Mary, who gets up to go and meet Jesus outside of town. “The Jews,” present everywhere you turn in these stories, follow her. She arrives shaking with grief. He catches his breath at the sight: this Mary broken up, racked with sobbing. He groans and cries.

“The Jews” see it. Some of them get nasty about it: “Could not the one who opened the eyes of the blind man have done something so that this man would not have died?”

Jesus goes into action. Roll the stone away, he says. The body will smell awfully, says Martha, the practical one. “Didn’t I tell you not to be that way?” Jesus says. The stone is removed, Jesus prays to the Father, he issues the call: “Lazarus, come out!”

He comes out: “Untie him and let him go,” says Jesus, and the rest is history — the gospel truth, we might say.

As for those “Jews,” they are pretty much understood to be the Jewish authorities. “Johannine [John] Christians” were Jews in conflict on the basic issue of messianic identity. This gospel, a sustained argument for Jesus as messiah, is for Jews who knew Greek, to convert them or to defeat them in an argument.

The late Rev. Raymond Brown, a Catholic scholar of the first water, concedes anti-Jewish sentiment here. At the very least, there was rivalry, sometimes intense. That’s how it was in those days.

I read yesterday . . . about God the stern leader . . . a sudden blow . . . death and destruction . . . Ezekiel the messenger . . . learning the hard way . . .

. . . from Ezekiel 24:15-23:

The word of the LORD came to me:
Son of man, by a sudden blow . . .

. . . the Lord God to His man at the helm, as ever mincing no words . . .

I am taking away from you the delight of your eyes,
but do not mourn or weep or shed any tears.
Groan in silence, make no lament for the dead,

. . . The listener shudders . . .

. . . bind on your turban, put your sandals on your feet,
do not cover your beard, and do not eat the customary bread.

He grips his fist, grits his teeth, tells his listeners, barely able to say it . . .

That evening my wife died,

and the next morning I did as I had been commanded.

The people ask, what about us? He listens, the Lord God “says to the house of Israel,

I will now desecrate my sanctuary, the stronghold of your pride,
the delight of your eyes, the desire of your soul.
The sons and daughters you left behind shall fall by the sword.

If that sounds bad to you, you have got the message.

Ezekiel shall be a sign for you: all that he did you shall do when it happens.

To what end?

It’s how you shall know that I am the LORD.

. . . learning the hard way.

You shall do as I have done, not covering your beards or eating the customary bread. Your turbans shall remain on your heads, your sandals on your feet. You shall not mourn or weep, but you shall rot away because of your sins and shall groan . . .

Here they have the no-nonsense God, speaking through His priest Ezekiel, His ambassador to His chosen people . . .

Or, put another way, more concisely, by translator Knox (further modified), Ezekiel speaking:

The Lord came to me, said he was going to take from me what I love most, told me to shed no tear over it, give into no sighing, show no grief, engage in no mourning.

So it happened. In the morning I told people what He had said, my wife died at sunset. Next day, I did what the Lord had told me to do, and the people were all agog to know the meaning of what I did.

I told them, the Lord has spoken to me, giving me a message for the race of Israel: he means to profane his own sanctuary, that proud boast of yours, which you love so, trembling ever for its safety.

Sons and daughters of yours, left behind at Jerusalem, will die at sword’s point. As I do now, you will do then — no veils on your faces, no mourner look on you, rather heads covered, feet shod, from you neither dole nor lament, but each of you sighing in his neighbour’s ear, ever under the load of your guilt.

Again, God’s people learning the hard way . . .

I read this today, 8 am mass, well attended, in celebration of Mary’s assumption into heaven. Pretty solid stuff, no, very solid. And poetic to beat the band . . .

The passage was (is) from the book of Revelation, better known as the Apocalypse, the last book of the New Testament. Have a look, keeping mind that it’s all about the Assumption.

God’s temple in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant could be seen in the temple.

Sets the scene.

A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.

Yes. Nothing matter-of-fact about it.

She was with child and wailed aloud in pain as she labored to give birth.

Mary, of course. No ordinary mother in labor. But wait.

Then another sign appeared in the sky; it was a huge red dragon, with seven heads and ten horns, and on its heads were seven diadems [crowns].

Satan et al.

Its tail swept away a third of the stars in the sky and hurled them down to the earth.

Then the dragon stood before the woman about to give birth, to devour her child when she gave birth.

Horrors.

She gave birth to a son, a male child, destined to rule all the nations with an iron rod.

Her child was caught up to God and his throne.

The woman herself fled into the desert where she had a place prepared by God.

The author John:

Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have salvation and power come, and the Kingdom of our God and the authority of his Anointed One.”

OK. A short, eerie Biblical shot at doing justice to a glorious event.

We make of the short passage what we can, buying into the mystery factor, letting it sink in, exposing the supernaturality of it all, reminding us how Mary is far more than a friend in a high place with our interests in mind (we knew that, of course), but a divinely chosen heroine who faced up to Satan while taking on the near-incredible role for which God chose her.

In a sense, the account does away with the sentimentality factor, especially with the description of the horrible creatures whom she had to defy while filling the role to which God called her.

God bless all. Our Mary Mother of God is an absolute marvel of God’s care for us.

CHAPTER 24 End of road for Fr. Devlin. Has it out with his friend Fr. Dolan. End of book. Author chimes in.

“When you get down to it, that’s the only way to do it,” Devlin told Dolan as they sat on the St. Emma’s front porch about 10 o’clock that night. The crickets were going again. Sunday night traffic was slow on the avenue. The two priests sat in the dark on wicker chairs, looking out onto the parish garden on the set-back front porch of the gray stucco rectory.

“I made the best of it, Terry,” Devlin continued. “Went out with a bang and all that.”

Dolan didn’t say anything.

“They deserved to hear from me on the subject. I couldn’t just fade away. I took my leave officially. I owed them as much.”

“You owed them more,” said Dolan.

“What else?”

“Being a little more gentle about it, for one thing. They didn’t need to get socked with it.”

“They did too.”

“You needed to sock them with it, you mean.”

“Well there you go again, Terry, inquiring into my motives. And commenting on them, to boot. Will you ever accept what I do at face value? You’ve got no use for psychology anyway. Why do you pull it on me?”

“O.K. OK. I shouldn’t talk that way,” said Dolan, throwing up his hands. “You have a right to your own sermon. I never contested that. But this one . . .” He trailed off.

“This one was my most important sermon, Terry. It beat the rest by far.”

“It was the most sensational, you mean. I’ll grant you that.”

“That’s the trouble with you priests.”

Dolan looked at him quickly, then turned back towards the garden and street farther away.

Devlin continued. “You shrink from the sensational. You’re so organization-minded, you don’t want to communicate. You want to say what’s good for the organization.”

Dolan turned to him. “Now stop that.” He held up one hand. “I caught that ‘you priests’ business too, by the way.”

“I’m out. You’re in. I know when I’m an outsider. See you in church if the windows are clean, and all that? Well as of this morning, I’m on the outside looking in.”

“Sure,” said Dolan. “You’re the aggrieved layman now, full of advice.”

“Only preaching what I practice,” said Devlin.

“Bull,” said Dolan.

They sat listening to crickets.

“What are you going to do?” Dolan asked.

“Well, I’m meeting tomorrow with Nate Goodman, who is offering me several entry-level opportunities with potential for early advancement, something suiting my advanced age and considerable achievements.”

“You don’t say.”

“You are looking at a man about to leave the ranks of the disinterested servants of humanity and enter those of the money-grubbers. I will report back in six months or six weeks on how it is out there.”

“Would you please.”

“Nate asked me if I wanted to make money. I said, were there any options? He said I could starve if I wanted to, or at least eat very lightly, sleep outside, that sort of thing. I said I wanted to make money. He said it was good to get that straight from the start, because if I was unsure in the matter, he couldn’t recommend me.”

“If you’re going to grub, you have to be serious about it.”

“Yes, people have to know they can count on you. They have to know you’re committed.”

“What’d you tell him?”

“That I was committed.”

“That’s what you told the previous archbishop twenty-five years ago.”

“If Nate could count on me for twenty-five years, he’d be happy.”

“Twenty-five years ago, both you and the archbishop had more than that in mind,” said Dolan.

“That’s true. As I said in my sermon, I’m not above reproach. As I also said, churches need more people like me.”

“Not if you’re proud of your underachievement or whatever you want to call it.”

“Sexual knee-skinning, I think was the term I used, more or less. I did leave Ginny out of it, however. Better a creative circumlocution than flat-out statement, any time, I say, especially in a repressive society. Did you ever hear that theory, that repressive governments encourage creativity? Writers have to come up with something clever enough to escape the censors, and they produce art in the process. Where anything goes, on the other hand, you get anything.”

“I never heard that theory. Is that why the samizdats are so good?”

“It’s a theory,” said Devlin.

They sat quiet for a few minutes. A fire engine went by, siren moaning.

“Where you gonna live?” Dolan asked.

“At Ginny’s.”

“Oh.”

“What are friends for, anyway? I need a place. She has one. I’m moving in.”

“You’re not broke, are you?”

“Hell no, I’m not broke. You know that.” There was a pause. “That bothers you, doesn’t it? It bothers you most of all that I’m about to go more or less public with an illicit relationship. If I was getting married, even by a judge, you’d feel better, wouldn’t you?”

“Yes, as a matter of fact, I would.”

“There you go, protecting institutions again. This time it’s marriage. You old conservative, moss-backed, traditional R.C. priest, running to the dikes with all five fingers, plugging holes. Save the institutions, full speed ahead.”

“Listen, Dev. You aren’t living apart from those institutions. You may yet be mugged by some punk who never knew family life at all and thinks a pimp’s car is heaven on wheels. Crap on family if you want, but it matters to all of use”

“Sure it does, Terry. But Ginny and I are not exactly storming the bastions of the American family. Give us a little time, O.K.? A little space too, if you don’t mind the expression. A little place of our own, all right? who knows what we may come up with in my delayed adolescence, or whatever it is? We may come back and join St. Emma’s and become pillars of it.

“I can see you now,” said Dolan, “the seven of you in the front pew, coming up with your envelopes at collection time. . .”

“Oh, I see. You’ve got us in a family way, haven’t you? God, you priests are insidious. And five kids? Or did Ginny stay home, and there are six? Or are two of us her parents visiting from Ohio?”

“To see what goes on in a Romish church, right,” said Dolan. “But the kindly veteran pastor is there to win them over, show them his Kiwanis button and drop hints about the Masons, you know, thinking he might join some day, or some of his best friends are Shriners, and so forth.”

“That’s you, the kindly pastor, right? Right, Terry? Still here holding the fort at St. Emma’s?”

“That’s me, Dev. Right. I’ll still be here with my fingers in the dike, saving society from itself. God, if Lacordaire could see me then.”

“Oh yeah, the French preacher. ‘What a life, O priest of Jesus Christ!’ I remember that. He made it look good, didn’t he? It looked good to me once.”

“But it doesn’t any more, does it?”

“Nope. I’m a fallen sparrow now. Not exactly hopeless but a hard case nevertheless,” said Devlin. Then a huge smile wreathed his face. He stood up. “I’m going to bed, Terry. Tomorrow I pack. I’ll be gone by noon.”

Dolan stood in the darkness and put out his hand. Devlin took it and squeezed, then put both hands on Dolan’s shoulders and squeezed again. Then he went inside for his last night in the rectory.

=========================

Author chimes in. He’s glad he discovered the text some months ago, in a long undisturbed file cabinet. He recalls writing it and being pleased with himself about it. Keep in mind it’s fictitious and implies no all-around approval of positions taken by its fictitious characters.

In any case, the book was written in the early 40s, remember, when he was in his early 50s and can be forgiven for lacking the ages-old wisdom of one in his middle 90s, right???

One final note, this about himself and early episodes as of 2009!!!

CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE. Father Devlin makes a killing announcement. He’s getting a divorce. His friends and neighbors do not see it coming. We hear about preliminaries. No one sees it coming . . .

Ginny Morgan was in a state of shock. She sat in her apartment in the heart of Chicago’s North Side singles district at five in the morning, shaking. Were she a drinking woman, she would long since have drowned her tensions. This was ridiculous, she felt. A lifetime of getting up in the morning and going to bed at night, and she had gotten all of two hours restless sleep that night, the night before she was to appear at a mass said by her friend Patrick Devlin.

She was ready to bet that she was the only woman about to marry a priest who was putting herself through this ordeal. Goofy as it was to be so upset about other people’s business – and she was convinced that saying mass and hearing it was someone else’s business not hers – she couldn’t walk away from it, because she had made it her own agenda.

She and the one-time nun Margo had discussed it in a way that made it sound perfectly normal, in fact necessary, if she was to throw her lot in with Patrick. Her life, with all its going to bed and getting up on time, had not been a paragon of organization. She’d gone in spurts from cause to cause, motivation to motivation, generally pursuing the writing trade and being pursued by it.

But it had generally been preparation, she finally decided under Margo’s questioning, for the something more substantial that involved connecting permanently with someone else. It had always been vaguely part of her personal baggage, that a Mister O.K., if not Right, was out there somewhere. (No Mister Goodbar, thank you.)

As for the writing part, she’d gotten to the point where she took it for granted. It was part of her life, after fifteen years or so of pecking at typewriter keys from scribbled notes and newspaper clippings. There were no decisions to be made about that. She was committed, one way or another, to observing and relating what she observed. In the manner of dichotomizing life that she’d heard expressed many times, professionally she was doing fine, personally only so-so.

She was on the brink of doing fine personally as well and didn’t want to screw it up. So she sat in her apartment at five a.m. and thought about the future. There were she and Patrick, with no plans to speak of. (They still hadn’t settled on anything, but were in effect drifting together.) She had her parents back in Ohio, still wondering now and then when Ginny-baby would get married and settled down. (Ginny-baby had wondered it herself.) How would they like it when she brought home a priest to dinner? And Patrick had his people.

There seemed to be a lot of them. Not family. He was vague about his brothers and sisters. She wasn’t even sure if there were any. His parents were dead. But his other family, which was the church — that was another story. She got the feeling sometimes that he was in a state of perpetual distraction, like a fireman or doctor waiting for the alarm to go or phone to ring. He seemed worlds away from belonging to anyone in particular (like her). He seemed to belong to some amorphous mass which held him in thrall with a harsh love and call to duty.

She was going to this mass because she felt she had to face up to this, attack it at its base, lest she be overwhelmed by it in her naivete and Protestant ignorance.

Margo the former nun had explained it to her. What was twenty years before a highly concentrated communal act full of long silences and sitting, standing and kneeling, had become since the Second Vatican Council (Ginny had heard about that) in many places a sort of free-wheeling vehicle of people’s own fears and hopes. Once there was the phenomenon of all eyes being focused on the robed back of the priest, who stood with arms outstretched, reading in Latin from the Missal, a red-covered all-purpose mass book, altar boys (never girls — there would be girls at the eleven, Patrick had told her — also faced the priest’s back, dressed in long black cassocks and white, blousy surplices which extended to below feet waist and elbows.

Mass was bell, book and candle time, with incense thrown in for good measure on more solemn occasions. Altar boys handled wine in small pitchers called cruets. They carried the big book around, often on its gold-embossed metal stand. They poured wine over priests’ hands into the chalice, lit and extinguished candles, carried the small “boat” filled with incense and swung the “thurible” on its long chain. Within the thurible burned the incense. If the altar boy did it right, the small piece of charcoal inside was hot and glowing when incense was spooned in by the priest from the boat, and then from the thurible came plumed clouds of sweet smoke which stood, Margo had once been told, for prayers of the faithful rising to heaven.

Rising to heaven. God was up there, the people were down here. The concentration on him above was complete. Everything that happened down here was to aid that concentration. Catholics went to church to pray to God, there was no doubt about that.

They used to. In many places that was no longer the case, Margo explained. In parishes like St. Denis (she knew of the place), God was a presence frequently alluded to. He (She?) was a dominant motif, a background to a self-centered discussion — not necessarily in any selfish sense, because neighborly concerns generally were the focus, but centered on the people involved, not on their God. God was in his heaven, but that had less to do with what happened at mass than his being in the midst of the worshipers. It was almost, Margo had explained to Ginny, as if God was legitimated by his being among the people, rather than the other way around.

No wonder I’m scared, Ginny thought, shivering briefly in her apartment. I’m going up against a tight-knit mass of people who lay claim to this man as their spokesman. A shaman he may or may not be: the important thing was that he represented them in their fear and bewilderment and their confidence and energy.

None of this she knew clearly and concisely. Thus the more frightening it was. She had this feeling, based on what she knew of Patrick and what she’d heard from Margo and picked up from being a Chicago resident for a half dozen years: you did not mess lightly with Mother Church. It was more than autocratic bishops and monsignors. It was a mass of fused concern. Life and death infused the mass: elemental forces gathered on a Sunday morning at eleven, her Patrick at the center of them. She shivered again, screwing her courage another turn.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Devlin lifted the chasuble over his head and let it down over him, for the briefest moment his vision obscured as the pullover vestment descended past his eyes. No matter. There was nothing to see or read at this least solemn moment of the proceedings, though once there were prayers posted as the vesting descended past his eyes. No matter. There was nothing to see or read at this least solemn moment of the proceedings, though once there prayers posted at vesting table, eyes-high, in latin, which the priest could read while vesting.

He recalled briefly the priests of his youth, approaching this very table — actually a deep shelf, a built-in table — after rising from kneeler next to it (the pre-dieu so called), as if already in the sacred mode, if not mood. There was silence in the sacristy, or at most some whispered conversation, and the altar boys stood at attention, having already filled the cruets and lit the candles. There were two for low mass, four for solemn-high — acolytes, thurifer (thurible-bearer) and master of ceremonies, the latter an eighth-grade boy (from the parish school, never a public school student) who had learned the many stops and turns and bows and scrapes that marked solemn high mass, one of which was held every Sunday at noon, come hell or high water.

But the solemn high at noon was poorly attended by the standards of those high-attendance years, because it was longer than the others and made greater demands on on its late-risen adherents. The two popular masses, the eleven in the church, the eleven-ten in the school hall down the block, were jammed, however. Ushers shoehorned people in between others who were sitting comfortably apart. This was togetherness in the pre-Vatican church of the ‘40s and ‘50s, to be shoehorned into the pews on Sunday, not to shake hands with your neighbor (or with your sister Kate, for that matter) just before communion, in the post-Vatican II American version of the kiss of peace.

You could hear mass in the school hall even as part of the rear-of-hall crowd that spilled out on to the school’s broad front walk. If you came late enough, you could listen to the bells announcing the consecration from outside the place of worship. There were those who considered this a good deal and would consider it likewise today, Devlin thought as he vested.

But there were others, a considerable minority, who flocked to the eleven of the 1980s as to their favorite club meeting. It was for them a combination of solemn moments interspersed with relaxation and even laughter and applause. No one shoehorned them into the pews; at St. Denis there weren’t enough to be shoehorned.

“Everything all right, Father?” Tim Flaherty, the red-faced usher, was asking him. He stood near the sacristy door, long-handled collection basket in hand, solicitous. Catholic collection baskets were long-handled. The usher held on to it all the way. Some Protestant baskets had no handles at all, but were passed around by the people in the pews. Flaherty was a conscientious basket-passer who never let go of the handle. Even now he clung to it as a badge of his authority.

“Just fine, Tim,” said Devlin. “Good to be back.”

“Do you like it at Saint Emma’s?” Flaherty asked.

“Very much, Tim. But it’s between jobs, you know. I’m there waiting an assignment.”

“I know you are, Father, and it will be a good one too, I’m sure. You’re too good a man to be let long on the shelf.” He smiled, nodded and left the sacristy for the church itself, apparently unaware that his outpouring of flattery had led to something of a gaffe.

On the shelf, eh? Devlin thought. But he didn’t mind it. How Tim Flaherty saw his position was the least of his worries. He had a mass to say, a swan song to sing at St. Denis, where if nothing else, he had come to terms with his ailment, the ennui that had gripped him for years.

He looked forward to the mass. Others now scurried around the sacristy, including two altar girls, both Skeltons. That was nice, he thought. He’ been through a few episodes with them and sat and chewed the rag and even been there when young Tom had run away (for a half hour) after he came on his mother, full of innocent zest having just gotten encouragement about her proposed column, hugging him, Devlin.

He laughed at the absurdity of that comedy of errors. Wonderful woman, Mimi Skelton, he thought. I hope she’s here today.

The reader, a young woman with a high-pitched voice, and the leader of song, a deep-voiced man about Devlin’s age, were lining up at the sacristy door. One of the Skelton girls took the crucifix and led the way into the church proper. The rest followed, with Devlin the mass’s celebrant, brining up the rear. Tim Flaherty smiled at him as he passed the ushers’ room, turned and headed down the long side aisle. The congregation was singing “Praise to the Lord,” and Ginny Morgan was standing next to a pillar on the side aisle, not daring to turn and look at the priest as he strode by in his regalia.

The procession reached the rear of the church and turned up the main aisle, heading toward the altar. Half way up, glancing to one side, he spotted the rest of the Skeltons, including their kindergartener and their first- and second-graders. The same glance showed him the Williamses a few pews ahead — Arthur, Melissa and their three kids. Good, thought Devlin. This is working out fine. Good turnout for my last shot. All that’s needed is for the Goodmans to show up, which is not likely but would be nice. No Dolan either. He’s occupied. So everybody’s here, he thought. Oh yes, he thought again. No Trib reporter. Thank God for small favors.

He strode up into the sanctuary where the marble altar rail had been torn out and sold for scrap. Devlin didn’t know if it had been sold. He had no idea. It happened before he came to the place as a priest. But he did figure the gold-plated gates into the sanctuary must have been worth a few bucks. Small price to pay for liturgical renewal, he thought, circling the table that stood in front of the high marble altar whose backdrop ascended dozens of feet into the air against the sanctuary wall.

He circled the presently used “free-standing” altar — so called by liturgists to distinguish it from the built-in affair where the priest stood with back to people — and approached it facing the congregation.

“The Lord be with you,” he said, eschewing the less formal and not uncommon “Good morning,” and the last mass was off and running.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Ginny was stunned. She never pictured it like this. The stateliness of it all, the attention of the people, the gestures of Patrick as he said his opening phrase. She’d never seen anything like it. Her Protestant experience, now several decades removed, was a static thing, stately too in its way, but not so grand. Some Episcopal friends had talked about their “mass,” but she’d never joined them for it. And her plain old Methodist church had done for singing what this place St. Denis was doing for a sort of liturgical choreography.

Patrick called for a moment of repentance, and people around her bowed their heads. Then he sat down on the big chair — she was ready to call it a throne — behind him, up a few steps. And a tall black woman strode from her position to Patrick’s right to the reading stand and in a high-pitched voice began to read from a big book.

It was the mass’s “first reading.” Something from St. Paul. Ginny sat with the rest and listened as the young woman announced:

“Now here, brother, is the news of the grace of God which was given in the churches of Macedonia.”

Ginny stole a look around her. Eyes were turned to the young woman. Macedonia?

“And of how, throughout great trials, by suffering, their constant cheerfulness and their intense poverty have overflowed in a wealth of generosity.”

The reader continued in a measured pace, her voice singing out over and past the church’s p.a. system. Ginny looked around her some more, now more boldly. Nobody was paying any attention to her.

The racial variety struck her — Filipino, black, people of apparent Mexican ancestry, judging from the Indian-like features, East Indian people, including a woman in a sari, the usual blend of white American faces.

A fat man with his stomach hanging over his belt caught her eye. She noted his heaviness, looked away, then looked again, amazed. She had to turn slightly to do so, but neither he nor anyone else paid attention to her. The man’s skin was showing where his shirt didn’t button all the way down, at belt level. Just about at the navel —from the angle she couldn’t see if the navel showed — his stomach had proven too much for the shirt button, and his white flesh showed.

Ginny’s eyes widened as she noticed it. She caught herself staring, then turned back, flustered, to the reader.

“I can swear that they gave not only as much as they could afford, but far more, and quite spontaneously, begging and begging us for the favor of us sharing in this service to the saints and, what was quite unexpected, they offered their own selves first to God and, under god, to us.’

She got about half of what the reader was saying. Back in the Methodist days of her youth, she hadn’t got much of Scripture readings either. She had had Bible drummed into her. This St. Paul talk about “service to the saints” and so forth, she found familiar enough. The longer the black woman spoke, the more familiar she found the situation. She began to sit back and relax.

The tall woman finished and sat down. The man on the other side, at another lectern, led them all in some prayers, and then Patrick went to the pulpit. Was he going to preach? Ginny sat up in her pew. He looked handsome up there. Would he talk about atheism? She found herself praying he wouldn’t.

Everyone stood. He read from the book, from St. Mark’s gospel, or as he said introducing the reading, “the gospel of Jesus Christ according to Mark.” It was about divorce.

“Leaving others, Jesus came to the district of Judea and the far side of the Jordan . . .” The east bank, thought Ginny, looking for points of reference.

“And again crowds gathered round him, and again he taught them, as his custom was. Some Pharisees approached him and asked, ‘Is it against the law for a man to divorce his wife?’ They were testing him. . . .”

Those Pharisees, testing him again. No worse group in the whole New Testament, as Ginny recalled from her Sunday school days. What the Pharaoh was to Moses, the damn Pharisees were to Jesus, bugging him at every turn.

“He answered them, ‘What did Moses command you?’” He let them do it, they answered. “’It was because you were so unteachable . . . ‘” Jesus told them. “’But from the beginning of creation God made them male and female. This is why a man must leave father and mother, and the two must become one body. So then, there are no longer two, but one body. So then, what God has united, man must not divide.’”

And on Jesus went, Patrick reading it, to tell his disciples afterwards that divorce and remarriage were the same as adultery, for man as well as woman.

Why was Patrick reading this? Ginny noticed people checking little leaflets, booklets really, they had pulled out of the pew rack, flipping through pages, looking at the index and so on, one or two lifting eyebrows.

She took up the booklet, which as well as she could figure carried the prescribed readings for a few-month period. She looked up the June Sunday that was the day at hand and saw a passage from St. John’s gospel, not the anti-divorce passage from St. Luke. What was going here, another Patrick Devlin surprise?

He finished his reading of the gospel passage. “The man who divorces his wife and marries another is guilty of adultery against her,” he read, quoting Jesus. “And if a woman divorces her husband and marriages another, she is guilty of adultery too.” Bang. He closed the book, straightened a bit and smiled.

“Good morning,” he said, oozing charm. “Thanks for having me back.”

Ginny saw people smile, returning Patrick’s greeting.

“I’m here because your parish priests are busy with more important things this morning.” He paused. “Just kidding,” he added. “One had a long-standing previous engagement, the other has a sick father. The gospel says you leave father and mother behind you when you follow Jesus, but the sick father won out this time. As it would for ninety-nine priests out of a hundred, if not a hundred out of a hundred.”

“That’s because we’re weak,” he said. “We’re all weak, including me.” He paused. “Weakness is our middle name. We barely know right from wrong, because of our.

“That’s because we’re weak,” he said. “We’re all weak, including me. Weakness is our middle name. We barely know right from wrong, because of our clouded consciences. And then when we do know, when we make a wild, accurate guess, we can barely summon up energy to move on the insight — or to reject it, for that matter. Call us weak-knees. That’s us.”

Ginny sat stunned. This was like nothing she ever heard from any pulpit as kid or grownup. Patrick talked with barely any inflection. He was relaxed, and a little smile played around his mouth. He spoke with no dramatic rise and fall in pitch, almost off-handedly. He didn’t hesitate, never inserted an “ah” or “uh” or (dreadful to hear) a “you know” or “sort of.” The church was very quiet.

“This is my sermon on my last day in your pulpit,” he said. “About weak-need people with special attention to divorce. I’m specially interested in divorce because I’m getting one. From you.”

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Arthur Williams nudged Melissa. She didn’t turn towards him but kept looking straight ahead at the man in the pulpit.

Arthur nudged her again, and she was filled with immense irritation at the man with whom she had cast her life, who sat in the pew next to her. “What do you want?” she whispered, barely moving her head toward him.

“Did you hear that?” he whispered back.

“Yes I heard it. Be quiet,” she said.

Arthur wiped his upper lip with his finger and looked back at the pulpit to hear the rest of Father Devlin’s swan song.

“Jesus socked it to the Pharisees in this passage,” said Devlin. “He explained away an early permissiveness — by Moses, no less, hardly your classic example of permissiveness — by dumping on the Jews. Or so the gospel writer tells us, whoever he was, or whatever committee.

“‘You people,’ Jesus said, or something close to it. The phrase that in the 1960s more than any other betrayed the white speaker to a black audience as one who pictured himself apart from ‘those people.’ Or so I was told by friends who worked in black neighborhoods in those days.

“You people, Jesus said, were so unteachable, your own leader Moses, who led you from nowhere to or near the promised land, had to let you off the hook. ‘You were so unteachable,’ he told the Pharisees, a fairly conscientious group who did get carried away sometimes, to be sure. Can you imagine someone coming into this community and telling us we’re unteachable? We’d crucify him.”

He paused. Mimi Skelton sat riveted, plunged into gloom. The better the sermon got — and she thought it was getting very good — the deeper the gloom. The priest she had come to know and love was calling it quits before her eyes. And doing it with style, in church. It was dreadful.

Her husband Ted, sitting two children removed from her, gave a look that said, “It’s a tough one, dear, isn’t it?” She acknowledged it with a nod, then turned to listen some more.

“Divorce is the question of the moment,” said Devlin, standing straight up, not leaning forward in the old style but making his own up for the occasion, staying with the near-monotone recitative. He was later to concede to Ginny that this was one of his best sermons, if not his best. She said she was in no position to argue the point.

“Should two people tear asunder what God has put together? The position of Jesus is clear, but let us examine the matter.”

Examine the matter? wondered Ginny. Since when do Christian preachers examine the matter when Jesus’ position is clear? This Patrick had better get out of his present position, while the getting was good, she thought.

“God works, after all, in strange ways,” said Devlin. “‘What he puts together, maybe sometimes he himself tears asunder. He lets people die, for one thing, to cite the most obvious case. ‘When a husband dies, the widow may marry, because God obviously tore asunder what he once put together.

“God lets people die. Does he let relationships die, so that marriages are dead while their two partners still live? Very tricky business here to most of us. Once you talk about relationships dying while the relators still are alive, you have opened up a Pandora’s box. You can weasel out of anything that way. Declare moral bankruptcy, file under theological Chapter Thirteen or Eleven, and you’re home free. All debts cancelled or at least shelved for a while, and it’s away we go!”

What’s he up to? wondered Ginny.

What’s all this about? thought Melissa Williams.

Oh Lord, let it end, thought Mimi Skelton.

“Do you get my drift?” asked Devlin, now leaning forward for the first time, as if awaiting an answer. He did pause for a few seconds — an eternity for the beginning speaker, but nothing for Devlin, who knew what he was doing in the pulpit if nowhere else. The pause captured the few who were daydreaming. Nobody answered Devlin’s question.

“I’m saying we all have our contracts, our debts, whatever. We all owe something, and we can’t just break things off. Jesus didn’t think so, anyhow, and I agree with him.”

Jesus must be glad to hear it, thought Ginny.

I’m glad to hear it, thought Melissa.

You better, thought Mimi.

“Marriage is the most obvious case,” Devlin said. “You can’t just break up a marriage, which is very serious business, often involving kids, but even when it doesn’t, involving two bruisable people who once trusted each other. Jesus hits the God part. God joined the two together, and so forth. But even without that, or beyond it, there are the two people who trusted each other. You can’t just walk away from that sort of thing,”

Two bruisable people, reflected Ginny.

He doesn’t deny the God part, he just ignores it, thought Melissa.

And you, Father, speaking of walking away? wondered Mimi.

“I say you can’t do that. When Catholic priests preach about marriage, they have to say you not we, for obvious reasons. Anything else priests can preach about, they can join in the universal recommending, commanding, condemning, whatever. Lying, cheating, stealing, backbiting, murder, treason, genocide, fornication, adultery, incest, envy, lust, jealousy, hatred, sodomy, greed, gluttony — you name it. Priests can do it, priests have done it, priests will do it again. At a lesser rate than the general population, we believe, we hope. But still they can do all these things — and more — and can, nay must, be included in any praise for avoiding or condemnation for indulging in these all too human behaviors.”

Ginny thought she would suffocate as the list of horrors went on, Patrick dragging this whole churchful of people through his gallery of abominations. Melissa was stunned at his dragging priests into all that. Mimi found herself, against her will, fascinated.

“The one thing priests can’t do is get a divorce, because they don’t marry. A simple, inner-city woman, being informed for the first time that priests didn’t marry, and assuming they enjoyed sex outside of marriage, castigated the priest who informed her, accusing him of all manner of illicit activity. Informed further that he neither married nor engaged in such activity, she announced her opinion, calling it impossible.” Told by the flustered priest that she would have to take his word for it, she said she did but still considered it impossible.

I sincerely hope he’s not going to talk about us, thought Ginny.

He means a black woman, thought Melissa, picturing several from her girlhood who might have reacted that way.

That story again, thought Mimi, who had heard it from her inner-city priest brother-in-law.

“The woman gave priests more credit than many of you. A theologian would say she gave more credit to the grace of God.”

Wouldn’t you? thought Mimi.

“As a matter of fact, the woman was right. The priestly life is impossible, or virtually so. As a priest for 25 years, I ought to know. I have watched, or at least heard in confession about people who have fallen and skinned their sexual knees enough times to use up a factory of band-aids. I’d be very surprised if this church didn’t have a good number of such people. I hope it does, in fact. Churches need people with first-hand knowledge of human weakness. We’re not so cocky that way. We are less likely to be vain about our wonderful track records,”

He’s wandering, thought Ginny, but he’s getting too close to me for comfort.

“I’m getting too close to some people for comfort,” Devlin said. “I’m getting close to myself, for that matter. I’m getting a divorce from you, as I said earlier. Not from St. Denis, by moving to another parish either. But from the whole darn people of God, all of whom everywhere must today say goodbye to Father Devlin, because he’s going. Leaving. Checking out. Anyone behind me, don’t forget to turn off the lights. Father Devlin is dead, long live Patrick Devlin the simple layman and ordinary citizen. Goodbye.”

(end of chapter 23)

From coming CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE of my 1984 novel DEVLIN MOVES ALONG . . .

In days gone by the mass of old:

Rising to heaven. God was up there, the people were down here. The concentration on Him above was complete. Everything that happened down here was to aid that concentration. Catholics went to church to pray to God, there was no doubt about that.

They used to.

In many places that was no longer the case, Margo explained. In parishes like St. Denis (she knew of the place), God was a presence frequently alluded to. He (She?) was a dominant motif, a background to a self-centered discussion – not necessarily in any selfish sense, because neighborly concerns generally were the focus, but centered on the people involved, not on their God.

God was in his heaven, but that had less to do with what happened at mass than his being in the midst of the worshipers. It was almost, Margo had explained to Ginny, as if God was legitimated by his being among the people, rather than the other way around.