The breakfast table challenge . . . 15 Oct 2009, a blast from the past . . .

Have been groping lately for breakfast-table reading. Nothing autocratic, you know, a la the senior Oliver Wendell Holmes (the good one). Something to feed the mind without requiring Great Books-style concentration.

Groping, I say, because of the increasingly slim and flimsy offerings in my two daily newspapers, Chi Trib and Sun-Times, both as to interest-level (don’t care about this, don’t care about that, over and over, I tell myself), lack of imagination (dying for a good lede, even a good head) and even-handed, let-chips-fall coverage.

Four days of the week I go to Kass at Trib or check out Dennis Byrne or Krauthammer and look for some crisply traditional raking of city, county, and state muck in either paper — especially Sun-Times, as by Tim Novak et al. and Fran Spielman, who gets more out of a Daley presser than any man or other woman I know about.

It’s getting worse. Size of paper I can live with, but boring biases and crippled imaginativeness I cannot.

So I look around and today found something worth spilling coffee on. It’s, lo and behold, Our Sunday Visitor, which by definition is not a daily paper but is definitely a newspaper not a magazine and which I am receiving on a trial complimentary basis.

More later, I trust, with special attention to [the late] Russell Shaw’s columnizing. Its web site takes some study, but you can start here.

WUXTRY, WUXTRY . . .The writer took on Chicago’s two main papers in November of 2003 and told what he saw, in case anyone was listening, watching, whatever . . . Some of you newspaper readers may remember . . .

WUXTRY, WUXTRY . . . Let us now read Chicago’s two highest-circulation newspapers, headlines first. Headlines because they are the ultimate shorthand, blunt instruments but not so blunt in the hands of skilled practitioners such as create them at Chi Trib and Sun-Times.

First grabber is “War funding bill passes” in Chi Trib. Gives one pause, in that rebuilding Iraq is what we have been hearing. War funding? “Fund the military and rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan” is in the lead paragraph by Jill Zuckman. That’s war funding?

2nd is “Jailed Russian oil chief resigns: Company’s stock soars after CEO announces exit,” heading very interesting story by Alex Rodriguez in Moscow, with “fueled speculation” in 2nd ‘graf that the man, a billionaire, is going to challenge Putin politically. [!]

Funny, for readers of the internet and watchers of TV news, the 1st story, “war funding,” is not new. That’s your hard-copy daily newspaper problem: how to tell readers what they don’t already know.

Big picture on p. 1 of returnees from bloody ‘copter downing in Iraq, “For families, sad news hits home: Copter victims.” But has Chi Trib been also telling us about progress reported in Iraq? As vividly? I will have to read it more closely, because I seem to have missed news of this aspect of our success. [?]

“Rockford [airport] tries to lure fliers from O’Hare: Northwest Chicagoland Regional Airport uses its new name, free parking and budget fares in effort to woo fliers from northwest and west suburbs” certainly has flare, with photo of spanking-clean passenger-waiting area. And news to this reader. Nice going, Trib, two stories so far on p. 1.

“U.S. rates home health firms: Survey compares 7,000 providers”? Really? Our govt. is rating health firms? What do you know about that? And what are these home health firms? Families?

“Poll says many on campus marching to GOP’s beat: Campaign 2004”? Now you are talking. Republicanism on campus may not be brand new, but it’s new enough to capture attention.

“Students leaning right” heads a mini-graph of poll results: 61% undergrads approve of GW [Bush], vs. 53% of general population, per Harvard’s Institute of Politics. Jeff Zeleny reports it out of Columbus, OH, where he went to talk to students. (And he really went there, we presume, vs. Jayson Blair of NY Times and his infamous hotel-room creations of sights seen and people interviewed.)

Three stories this day on Chi Trib page one!

Sun-Times? Has big pic of “two brothers in mourning” over their brother killed in a ‘copter crash. Neither am I full of recollection of this paper’s stories about progress in Iraq. Must read more carefully.

SADDAM SURE U.S. ATTACK WAS HOAX [upper case in original]: [Ex-foreign minister] Tariq Aziz tells interrogators that deposed leader did little to prepare for invasion” is head for p. 3 story from sister-paper London Telegraph with AP help, citing a Wash Post story that ran yesterday.

So we have here the work of enterprising editors who assume (safely) that most of us do not read Wash Post regularly.

Nothing like that in the head, “Burke [feisty alderman] wants ‘car for sale’ signs banned from Chicago streets: Claims Indiana car dealers use roads here for sales,” by the excellent Fran Spielman, enterprising City Hall reporter.

It’s about “Let’s Have an Ordinance” Alderman Eddie B., recently heard complaining about smokers on THE SIDEWALK, FOR GOSH SAKES, whom he had to pass on his way from the Hall to his law office for this or that highly lucrative meeting.

This, of course, is Sun-Times’s forte. (Say “fort” not “fortay,” by the way, although being not the first by whom the new are tried nor yet the last to lay the old aside is a rule increasingly hard-pressed to justify it.) What aldermen do is grist for S-T mill. Burke of course favors a draconian measure; he thinks draconian.

P. 1 has other reefers (not marijuana but blotches of type & pix that refer the reader to story elsewhere in paper): New Sox mgr, new movie, and a Richard Roeper column, “Why this girl’s parents are despicable,” next to head shot of Utah girl abducted by Mormon lunatic.

Ah. Roeper has found something he truly, truly objects to and is very, very angry.

— Thus did one reader discover and pass on to blog-readers in (23) years gone by. —

From the long-ago box: a Courage conference at Chicago’s Mundelein seminary in 2010. A man recounts his “spiritual journey” from “practicing homosexual to practicing Catholic”. . .

St. Eulalia day according to pre-Vatican missal. 13-year-old virgin who stood by Jesus in 303 in an emperor’s persecution, paid with her life painfully . . .

Mass goers used to recall and pray to her . . .

Her story in brief.

Saint Eulalia, 290–12 February 303, co-patron saint of Barcelona, was a 13-year-old Roman Christian virgin who suffered martyrdom in Barcelona during the persecution of Christians in the reign of emperor Diocletian.

For refusing to recant her Christianity, the Romans subjected her to thirteen tortures; including:

  • Putting her into a barrel with knives (or glass) stuck into it and rolling it down a street (according to tradition, the one now called Baixada de Santa Eulalia “Saint Eulalia’s descent”).[2]
  • Cutting off her breasts
  • Crucifixion on an X-shaped cross. She is depicted with this cross, the instrument of her martyrdom.
  • Finally, decapitation.

She is commemorated with statues and street names throughout Barcelona.[2] Her body was originally interred in the church of Santa Maria de les Arenes (St. Mary of the Sands; now Santa Maria del Mar, St. Mary of the Sea).

It was hidden in 713 during the Moorish invasion, and recovered only in 878. In 1339, it was relocated to an alabaster sarcophagus in the crypt of the newly built Cathedral of Santa Eulalia.[3] The festival of Saint Eulalia is held in Barcelona for a week around her feast day on February 12.[4]

Posted by Deacon John at 12:30 AM . . .

. . . who posts such pre-Vatican 2 items every day

3rd week Jesuit novices long retreat, 1950, hard look at the hard life, Jesus bearing the sins of the world, ours included . . .

I was to choose a hard life to be like Christ, who was poor and was treated badly. This hard life was to be my preference. This was the background for meditating on the public life, to look at how Jesus lived and pledge ourselves to imitation. This was years before the “What would Jesus do?” business got traction. If we used to just pray by asking for things or trying not to let things worry us, now we were to become absorbed completely. We may have said our morning and night prayers and gone to mass on Sunday and made a weekend retreat and considered ourselves pretty pious. Now we were in the big leagues. And we were just getting started.

WHIPS AND NAILS

We got to Palm Sunday in our meditations and then had a second break day, 17 or 18 days into the retreat. Now the Third Week, on the passion and death of Christ—Mel Gibson stuff, imagining it all in detail. When Gibson’s movie came out, I was not tempted to see it and did not, having already spent a week immersed in the gruesome, tragic denouement. Shades were drawn again, mood turned somber, laughter disappeared, the novice master did not smile. For five or so days, we went chapter and verse, line by line through the grim tale. We imagined details—whips, nails, betrayal, agony of prayer, submission to the will of the father, burlesque-like denial by Peter, the sorrows of the mother, the loyalty of the women friends.

We knelt four times a day 45 minutes at a time, after a half hour of listening to the master. If there was hell to deter the tempted, there was now also the idea of betraying our leader. We saw Jesus in the garden of olives as bearing the sins of the world, ours included, which he was expiating. We saw ourselves as contributing to his suffering. Focusing on that, we prayed for forgiveness and pledged fidelity. Jesuits of that time engaged in such gut-wrenching. They would in various degrees adopt intellectuality—the philosophical mind was coming—but at the start they engaged their feelings to the utmost.

Meditating on passion and death with shades drawn, as we had on death and judgment, we inhabited a sort of spiritual steam room. Rising and praying, keeping silence all day, we would look forward to the conference, when we didn’t have to work but were talked to. The master was engaging. He sat at his little table, the soul of control and focus.

MASTER OF MEN

Apart from his role as retreat master, he was also there when you needed him. I knocked on his door once before the retreat, when I’d had a very bad day, had gotten tired out playing too much baseball on a sub-tropically hot and steamy day and trying too hard on various other things. I was played out and feeling very sorry for myself.

Opening his office door, he took one look and knew I was careening toward trouble. His face softened visibly. “Carissime,” he said, using the novice’s title — Latin for “dearest,” or even “dear friend”— not my first name as he usually did. “The Lord wants you here.”

He had read me perfectly, having probably seen dozens of faces like mine, strained and contorted. And he knew what to say. I was stopped in my tracks by his combination of empathy and conviction.

I stayed. Staying was a big issue, to be sure. We were told not to doubt our vocation. Leaving was a very bad thing. This was underlined by procedure. Those who left the novitiate (“checked out” or just “checked”) just disappeared. No notice was posted. The manuductor, a novice appointed as a sort of trusty who met daily with the master, would be informed. He had to know if someone was no longer available for various jobs, from dishwashing to helping in the garden.

The word would get out, of course, if only from those in his dorm who saw an empty cubicle and knew no one had died or been stricken. Years later, leaving the Jesuits, I said goodbye to five or six contemporaries at a high school loading dock before driving away in my rental car for my first ex-Jesuit job. It was not like that in the 50s. You left in the dead of night or at least when almost no one was looking.

During the retreat the master was almost our entire contact with the world outside ourselves. He was a deeply conscientious man, intense but endowed in my opinion with adequate common sense. He could shoot down excessive mortification plans with a wry look, so that the novice who was overly interested in saving on tooth paste or socks (ours was a small world with big goals) would think twice about it. He enjoyed life. The ready grin was not shown to make points; among his peers, he would sometimes laugh so hard he could hardly stop. He also could look very serious and stern without half trying.

By and large, in my opinion, we were in good hands, though some resented him as harsh and out of touch. Penance and mortification got closer than usual attention in the third week. As we contemplated suffering and death, we heard or read about “rules to be observed” as to eating and drinking.

The one that stayed with me is the last, that in deciding how much to eat and drink, the time to decide is after a meal not before it. When you’re fat and happy, you see things differently, of course. If you found you were giving in too often, then you were to eat even less. Go against yourself. In Latin that’s “agere contra,” to go against. It was a byword in Jesuit ascetism.

— Coming up, ALLELUIA TIME

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song . . .

. . . I’m worried now, but I won’t be worried long

. . . and other tunes pop into the head.

Smile, darn ya, smile

Life is really only what you make it.
Step right up and show them you can take it.
Make life worthwhile.
Come on and smile, darn ya, smile!

Button up your overcoat

When the wind is free
Take good care of yourself
You belong to me

Down Argentine Way

You’ll find your life will begin
The very moment you’re in Argentina
If you’re romantic Senor
Then you will surely adore Argentina

They All Laughed

They all laughed at Christopher Columbus
When he said the world was round
They all laughed when Edison recorded sound

You sigh, a song begins . . .

You speak and I hear violins
It’s magic
The stars desert the skies
And rush to nestle in your eyes
It’s magic

Without a golden wand
Or mystic charms,
Fantastic things begin
When I am in your arms

Buckle Down, Winsocki

Buckle down, Winsocki
Buckle down
You can win, Winsocki
If you knuckle down
If you break their necks
If you make them wrecks
You can break the hex,
So buckle down,
Make ’em yell Winsocki, make ’em yell.

Anchors away

Stand Navy out to sea
Fight our battle cry
We’ll never change our course
So vicious foe steer shy-y-y-y
Roll out the TNT
Anchors aweigh
Sail on to victory
And sink their bones to Davy Jones, hooray

Let’s call the whole thing off.

Things have come to a pretty pass
Our romance is growing flat
‘Cause you like this and the other
While I go for this and that

Goodness knows what the end will be
Oh, I don’t know where I’m at
It’s plain to see we two will never make one
Something must be done

You say eether and I say eyether
You say neether, I say nyther
Eether, eyether, neether, nyther
Let’s call the whole thing off

You like potato and I like po-tah-to
You like tomato and I like to-mah-to
Potato, po-tah-to, tomato, to-mah-to
Oh, let’s call the whole thing off

Enough for now.

2nd week of 1950 long retreat for Jesuit novices: Jesus as preacher and miracle-worker . . .

From Company Man: My Jesuit Life, 1950-1968:

Break day done, we embarked on the second week, meditating on Jesus as itinerant preacher and miracle-worker.  This was our introduction to the Ignatian imagination.  We were put to picturing or contemplating Gospel events, as opposed to great and noble thoughts.  In episode after episode, we imagined ourselves there with Jesus, almost without attention to the meaning of it for ourselves but rather to get familiar with him.  This was a far cry from the moralizing Sunday sermon we had grown up on, staples of our upbringing: The boy Jesus found in the temple?  Honor thy father and mother.  The wedding feast at Cana?  A word for the sacrament of matrimony.

Multiplying the loaves and fishes?  Consider the boy with the two loaves and how our little becomes a lot thanks to Jesus. We had prayed to get things or win things or improve ourselves, as with “Jesus meek and humble of heart, make my heart like unto thine,” a standard “aspiration,” or short prayer, of our Catholic-schooled youth.  This time we pretty much just looked at Jesus and the people in his life.  Lessons were obvious enough, supplied by context, but they weren’t the main thing.  That was the scene itself.  We practiced “application of the senses” in prayer, much as writing students learning how to see what others missed.  A few years later I did a paper on the poetry of Robert Southwell, one of the English Jesuits who was caught by Elizabethan priest-hunters and executed.  Southwell’s “Burning Babe” and other poems reflected his Spiritual Exercises experience, according to critics I consulted.  I wrote to demonstrate that.  Here we were more or less monks in a monastery, meditating the hours away to get closer to Jesus, and all the while imbibing a whole poetic vision or style.  It was no simple thing being a Jesuit.

This second week, covering seven or eight more of the 30 days, was a breeze compared to that hell and death stuff.  The shades stayed up, the sun came in, Father Master got light-hearted and tried humor at times.  His points (for meditation, remember) were not aimed narrowly at inculcating a position on anything but rather at infusing a habit.  We were gearing up for a life of prayer.  But there was more.

CHANGING LIVES We were also gearing up for a life-changing decision.  Here in this second week, we ran into the element of the Exercises that one could argue is most peculiarly Ignatian.  Ignatius had done a one-eighty, going from glory-seeking in the macho-chivalric mode of hair-trigger touchiness to ascetical stoicism mixed with tough-minded resolve.  In the process he became a specialist in the life-changing decision.  He had stumbled on it while recuperating and had gone to Manresa after deciding to change his life.  So with us.  We entered the novitiate after deciding to change ours.  He took ten months to rub his nose in that decision.  We had two years to do it, with emphasis on this 30 days.  (Actually, we took our ten months in the 15th year of training, after theology, what was called tertianship, about which more later.) So in this second week, we heard about Ignatius’ three kinds of men, his exercise in being honest with yourself.  The one kind, faced with the hard, noble thing to do, never quite decides.  The second decides in a way that pleases him and deceives him at the same time.  The third bites the bullet.  We were to be the third kind of man: whatever we decided we should do, we would do, without ifs, ands, or buts.  It’s what real men did. That said, the Second Week was a fooler.  Relaxed we might be picturing Jesus touring Israel, doing miracles and preaching.  But there were these Three Kinds of Men and before that, at week’s start, the call to arms of “the earthly king,” a what-if situation quickly converted to the call of the heavenly king, Christ.  This was the sort of call that moved Ignatius and his fellows.  Oh to have a king to whom one could pledge undying loyalty and unstinting service!  Nay, there was such a king, and his name was Jesus Christ! The king part didn’t do much for us, but we did have service in mind or we wouldn’t have been there.  We meditated with a view to how it should affect our lives.  In the midst of these travels with Jesus, we were asked what side we were on.  Whose flag or standard would we follow, his or the devil’s?  In the Meditation on Two Standards, “the one of Christ, our Commander-in-chief and Lord; the other of Lucifer, mortal enemy of our human nature,” it was Jesus or Satan.  Life on earth was a warfare.  This was boot training. We were to embrace “spiritual,” even actual poverty, “contumely and contempt,” and what was to result from accepting it, humility.  For us it was to be poverty not wealth, contempt not worldly acclaim, humility not pride.  From this we were to proceed to “all the other virtues.”  We were not just to put up with trouble when it showed on our doorstep, we were to go looking for it.

BITING BULLETS The Three Kinds of Men had to decide whether to keep a bundle of money—10,000 ducats, not stolen!  The first and second kind of man wouldn’t or couldn’t give it up.  The third got himself to the point where he didn’t care.  He was detached, ready to do justice to the important thing—to follow the king, ignoring the consequences.  Once you got to this point and as long as you stayed there, you were ready for trouble.  There were moments of peace in this Second Week, the sort that comes when you relax and say let the chips fall, etc.  But the pressure was building.  There we were as young as seventeen, as old as the mid-30s, 50 of us, getting up at 5 a.m. in a Spartan dormitory and hitting our kneelers at 5:30 for a soul-searching session in the presence of God, pledging to do hard things.  God and Christ wanted a few good men.  Did we qualify?  A few months short of 19 myself, about as raw as I could be, I overflowed with resolve.  I was ready to storm the bastions, I told myself and whoever else was listening, in this case God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost and all the saints and angels—plus the novice master when the occasion offered.  There was a third motivational meditation, or ploy, from the Ignatian playbook, about the three “modes” or degrees of humility, actually dedication.  The first was readiness to do what’s needed to be saved, “namely, that I so lower and so humble myself, as much as is possible to me, that in everything I obey the law of God.”  No Faustian bargains: “Even if they made me lord of all the created things in this world . . . for my own temporal life, I would not be in deliberation about breaking a Commandment, whether Divine or human, which binds me under mortal sin.”  I wouldn’t even think about it. Pledging the second degree, I wouldn’t even think about a venial sin, “not for all creation, nor because they would take away my life.”  I was to care not about money or honor or how long I lived, as long as God was served and my soul was saved.

— more more on the long retreat as life-changing experience —

Jesuit novices’ long retreat in 1951, 30 days as Ignatius had it . . .

BIG NOT-EASY

Return now to the first weeks of novitiate, inching by as we approached the Big Muddy, Big Ditch—name your obstacle course—the Long Retreat.

We had arrived August 8, another group arrived on September 2.  We and a few novice brothers, who had arrived one by one in the previous year on their own schedule, not in a class, were en route to a 30-day meditation fest that would end on the last Sunday of October, the feast of Christ the King, when we would emerge in all our glory, having survived a long initiation.

If it sounds grueling, consider the fraternity initiation I and one other of us had undergone at Loyola—six weeks of programmed humiliation and physical punishment that led us to brotherhood and in some cases lifelong friendship.  Those were the days.

Youth was wasted on the young, Shaw said, calling it a pity.  Not so this coming novitiate event.  Rather, it was to be life-changing.

The retreat would be the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius Loyola, the 16th-century hidalgo with an itchy sword arm turned dedicated religionist.  Disabled by a cannon

shot in a siege of the Basque city of Pamplona in northern Spain, at 30, he underwent painful surgery for vanity’s sake, so he could wear snappy boots.  While recuperating, he ran out of inspiring stories of military derring-do and turned to lives of Jesus and the saints.  These inspired him in quite another direction.  He began to reassess himself.  From dreams of earthly glory he turned to heavenly.  Accustomed to kingship as going concern, he pictured Jesus as his king, his beau ideal, his general.  Two years after his wounding, he found himself in a cave at Manresa in northeastern Spain, fasting and doing penance and taking on noonday devils and all others that showed up. He had a close call getting to Manresa.  He ran into a Moor and discussed religion as they rode along.  It was almost fatal for his newfound spiritual intentions and for the Moor, who spoke disrespectfully of the Blessed Mother.  Ignatius had to think twice about that and came within a hair’s breadth of chasing the fellow and sticking him with his dagger.  The story, a good one, is that he left it to the mule, who took a different road, away from the Moor. In the cave, wrestling with himself more than with devils for 10 months, not all of it in the cave, he was born again.  He came from the experience a changed man.  Not all of it in the cave, because he had to get out and do odd jobs for food, in which respect he was a sort of Thoreau at Walden Pond, but he did not eat as well.  Out of the 10 months also came a scheme of spiritual rebirth and renewal, the Spiritual Exercises, which in a few years took shape as a little book that shook the world, a sort of blueprint for self-examination and conversion.  It was these exercises, all 30 days of them, to which we 50 young Americans gave ourselves in the month of October, 1950.  Let us consider that experience.

DOWN TO BASICS 

On the first day of the first week, we went at the meaning of life, rehearsing what we already had heard and absorbed, most of us, from our youngest days.  It was simple stuff, reminiscent of the Baltimore Catechism: God made us, we are meant for his purposes.  More precisely, “Man is created to praise, reverence, and serve God our Lord, and by this means to save his soul.”  Basic stuff, bread and butter Christianity, worth repeating.  We heard it in conferences with “Father Master” in our little third-floor chapel, with its dark walls, dark kneelers, dark chairs.  In the conferences he provided “points” for meditation.  The schedule was “points and meditation” four times a day, with points for the morning given the night before, the better to fall asleep thinking about them, the better to wake up still thinking about them.  It was an exercise in thought control.  We were concentrating mightily. Father Master was also “the master,” as we commonly referred to him, without embarrassment at using a phrase from Eastern religious discipline, not even thinking about it.  For one thing, he was in no way Eastern.  He was Bernard “Bernie” Wernert from Toledo, Ohio.  Gaunt, dark-complexioned, big-eyed, intense even when his face broke into lines with the broadest of smiles, he sat facing us at a little table on which he laid notes on typed half-sheets.  He never looked unprepared and always seemed to say just what he intended. We looked at that face four times a day for 30 days, minus three break days separating the “weeks” of the Exercises—divisions of meditation material rather than seven-day periods.  We meditated also on break days but far less, being given the morning and afternoon for hiking and playing.  The news of a break day came on the second-floor bulletin board after breakfast.  The first of these was the tenth day, after nine days thinking about life and death.  One of us, a high-strung track man who had special permission to go off running on his own to let off steam, burst out almost hysterically at the news.

DEATH’S STING

No wonder.  After creation and our purpose in life on the first day, we heard about sin, death, hell, with a little bit of heaven tossed in at the end.  We pictured ourselves on our death beds, kneeling with shades drawn and lights dimmed.  The sun still shone outside or didn’t, I can’t remember.  But I remember the meditation and recalled it years later, when I told a psychiatrist about it.  He wasn’t treating me.  My wife and I were at dinner with others of his profession prior to a talk by the famous death-and-dying expert Elizabeth Kubler Ross.  When talk with the professionals came to imagining oneself dying, it came to me: I had done that, in the First Week. Into such a week, put your more than usually pious, relatively sensitive 18-year-old.  Put him in a dark room and have him meditate on his death as if it were then and there, and you have the potential of a soul-searing experience—Billy Graham, who had his own life-changing episode, and John Wesley, founder of Methodism, would recognize it.  I shrink from too dramatic a designation, but I do know that tossing hell into the mix in another of the first nine days—before or after, I do not recall—gives a young man pause.  It was certainly geared to help a back-sliding novice think twice about leaving the novitiate, “checking out,” as we put it, or just “checking.”  Neither fear of ostracism on leaving—for most of us, there would have been none—nor precipitate ending of a chosen career (we were young enough to start over, so what?) nor a dipping of one’s personal flag with accompanying sense of failure (again, so what at this stage?) did the job on the dark days of the 22 novitiate months yet to come.  It was the fear of hell that hung in the minds and hearts of some of the weary and disconsolate. So much for hell.  The first week had heaven too.  We pictured torment and loss in meditating the one and joy without end in the other.  Even death had its light moments.  Demonstrating how we know neither the day nor the hour, Father Master listed Jesuits he knew who had cashed in without a moment’s notice.  As he did so, Charley O., Marine vet and highly motivated spirituality practitioner, got a giggly fit, he said later.  He kept it bottled in at the time, and many men together could not have spied it, I’m sure.  It was the image of those Jesuits dropping like flies, he said later.  Which goes to show, you can find a laugh in just about anything if you just let the spirit move you.

Food for thought — If possible, settle issues out of court, Paul tells his Corinthians

No if-possible about it.

Via Ronald Knox, 1 Cor 6:1-11:

1 Are you prepared to go to law before a profane court, when one of you has a quarrel with another, instead of bringing it before the saints?
2 You know well enough that it is the saints who will pass judgement on the world; and if a world is to abide your judgement, are you unfit to take cognizance of trifling matters?
3 You have been told that we shall sit in judgement on angels; how much more, then, over the things of common life?
4 You would do better to appoint the most insignificant of your own number as judges, when you have these common quarrels to decide.?
5 That I say to humble you. What, have you really not a single man among you wise enough to decide a claim brought by his own brother?
6 Must two brethren go to law over it, and before a profane court?
7 And indeed, it is a defect in you at the best of times, that you should have quarrels among you at all. How is it that you do not prefer to put up with wrong, prefer to suffer loss?
8 Instead of that you commit wrong, you inflict loss, and at a brother’s expense.
9 Yet you know well enough that wrong-doers will not inherit God’s kingdom. Make no mistake about it; it is not the debauched, the idolaters, the adulterous,
10 it is not the effeminate, the sinners against nature, the dishonest, the misers, the drunkards, the bitter of speech, the extortioners that will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 That is what some of you once were; but now you have been washed clean, now you have been sanctified, now you have been justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, by the Spirit of the God we serve.

Think about it.