One of the D.C. gangs

Oak Park (IL) village manager Tom Barwin is not apologizing for saying the Supreme Court is “in alliance with the gangbangers” in its ruling in favor of individual right to own a gun, but he does have advice for others:

“I really think we ought to tone down the emotion, which I will also try to do,” he said. “But I think we should be working harder to find common ground and eliminate these conditions that breed violence.

He will try very hard to tone it down but is willing to leave the Supremes dangling with gangsters.

“I think the … gangbanger comments really just were a way to succinctly express that, in my experience and view, the further proliferation of guns will inevitably result in more drug pushers and those of a criminal mind ending up with firearms.”

As it is, of course, they have to get along with their bare fists?

Later, from Dick Cutler in Ann Arbor:

I have strong sentiments about private possession of firearms.  I grew up on a farm; I had guns then; I have guns now (several, would you like an inventory and a report of my marksmanship?); and FINALLY, “I intend to keep my  guns and my skill in using them  — so as to be prepared to shoot the miserable ass off anyone who comes to take them from me.”

2 thoughts on “One of the D.C. gangs

  1. The NAR and the criminals may approve this decision. Whether or not it wreaks havoc in our streets is of course debatable. What is not, however, are the good intentions of cities like Chicago and Oak Park that have been struck a hard blow

    Like

  2. Gee, Jack, you mean that the strict gun laws of Chicago and Oak Park haven’t rid the criminals of their guns? Who’d a thunk it?

    Could it be that it’s because the criminals don’t obey the law? NAH. They probably just didn’t know the law. We need better and stronger laws to keep the law-abiding from owning guns to protect themselves. That will really help.

    Like

Leave a reply to Margaret Cancel reply