Guns no? Not everywhere.

Blithe Spirit 1 Minute

Dem platform will be anti-gun:

“Boiled down, all it really means is that the Democrats are still the party of gun control no matter how they try to re-package the rhetoric.”

So will Oak Park:

So far, Oak Park appears to be the only suburb ready to go to court to contest the Supreme Court decision, though others may follow as the NRA continues to bring lawsuits against other Illinois towns with similar handgun bans.

OP will join Chicago in its resistance to the Supremes.

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley has said the city plans to fight in court to keep its handgun ban in place, and Oak Park is likely to join the battle.

Major question here: What will it cost OP?  I mean in money.

Tags: ,

Published by Jim Bowman

Jim Bowman covered religion 1968-78 for the Chicago Daily News, since then has written books, articles, etc., mostly on corporate history but also on religion (Company Man: My Jesuit Life, 1950-1968), and more recently on politics (Illinois Blues: How the Ruling Party Talks to Voters -- Lulu.com, Kindle). Longtime Oak Park, Illinois, resident, he lives now on Chicago's North Side, where four of his and Winnie's six children live close by.

Published

One thought on “Guns no? Not everywhere.”

  1. How do you go to court to fight the Supreme Court? Are these people completely nuts?

    Do these people know so little about history that they don’t understand that guns are not just about self-defense, but also that an armed poppulace is a defense against tyranny? This is why all totalitarians first go after peoples’ guns.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment