O-talk

I give you this to chew on, as example of Tricky O.’s ways:

Does Barack Hussein Obama want to SILENCE RUSH?

His campaign now says he doesn’t support the so-called “Fairness Doctrine” (a measure that liberals are trying to impose to get rid of the only medium that gives equal time to conservative thoughts and opinions; namely, conservative talk radio) — athough he supported it several months ago.

Michael Ortiz, the Obama campaign’s press secretary, told Broadcasting and Cable:

“Senator Obama does not support re-imposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters.”

But what many liberal media outlets are not reporting is THE REST OF ORTIZ’S STATEMENT!

Ortiz continued:

“He considers this debate to be a distraction from the conversation we should be having about opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible. That is why Sen. Obama supports media-ownership caps, network neutrality, public broadcasting, as well as increasing minority ownership of broadcasting and print outlets.”

Forget about those short-sighted liberal plots to silence Rush Limbaugh and all those other pesky conservative talk-radio hosts.  Obama has a bigger vision!

It’s from Human Events, complete with scary coloring.  We report (what we think is worth reporting), you decide.

As for his support for neutrality, etc., that’s clearly a shot at free speech in a free market, in which he’s no worse than Pelosi, right.

Tags:

One thought on “O-talk

  1. No guns for law-abiding citizens, no free speech on the airwaves unless “balanced” (by whose standards?), no freedom of religion if discussion of sin causes someone, somewhere to feel hurt. The press is already in Leftist hands (with a few exceptions) while the Left works to destroy the premier rights in the Bill of Rights.

    Obama and his cohorts must lie to the voters about their intentions because they intend to steal our freedoms if they can.

    Like

Leave a comment