On the street where you make a living

The whole world is watching:

Abc_arrest_denver_080827_mn

But officer . . .

Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as he and a camera crew were attempting to take pictures on a public sidewalk of Democratic Senators and VIP donors leaving a private meeting at the Brown’s Palace Hotel.

He was cuffed and taken away.

[Asa] Eslocker [the producer] and his ABC News colleagues are spending the week investigating the role of corporate lobbyists and wealthy donors at the convention for a series of Money Trail reports on ABC World News with Charles Gibson.

The more things change . . .

Hard copy heads, soft heads, dramatic prose: color is purple

Sun-Times page one home-delivery head is Mary Mitchell column.

“Obama’s verdict: ‘She delivered.’”

Chi Trib’s is a bit more tentative.

“Did she sell it?”

Wall St. Journal’s is reportorial.

“Clinton calls for unity”

Washington Post (online) digs deeper.

‘STILL BITTER’ Many Clinton Supporters Say Speech Didn’t Heal Divisions” 

Great speech, says Post,

But when Clinton stepped off the stage and the standing ovation faded into silence, many of her supporters were left with a sobering realization: Even a tremendous speech couldn’t erase their frustrations.

S-T’s using column for head has precedent.  Other day they headlined a Carol Marin column: “Nepotitis!”  No cure, etc.  (I thought Marin was terminally ill with a new disease, but they were talking about nepotism in Illinois politics.)

Trib’s

I watched her speech from the press tent a few yards away from the main hall.

I wouldn’t be telling you anything you didn’t already know if I said the first thing you feel (not see—because the feeling hits you in the gut) about Sen. Hillary Clinton is that she’s a complicated figure.

If we already know, why is she telling us?  Feeling hits in gut?  Who would have thought that?  H. is not just complicated, but “a complicated figure.”  Yes.  Leave tight writing for Western Union.

Love her or hate her, she’s tough as hell. It’s hard not to — at the very least — stand in awe of a woman who wins 18 million votes in a presidential contest. She calls it 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling. I couldn’t agree more.

And yet, that gut feeling you get sometimes turns to queasy.

I feel her queasiness.  

Hillary called it 18 million cracks, and Michelle used the phrase.  Quick reference here, pls.  Some of us non-Hillary-fans didn’t get Michelle’s allusion.

Turner T. offers this insightful remark, again in junior-high-winning prose, this time with a bit of Hemingway:

Hillary Clinton was determined to win during the primary. She wanted it—badly. [sic]

Wow.  And the stunning closer:

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a fighter. That’s who she is, through and through. [Blah blah]  Yes, the primary got ugly. It became divisive. She and her husband danced some not-so-fancy footwork around the color line. African Americans (and others) felt sucker punched.

But, in the end, it wasn’t personal. The Senator from New York [dramatic flourish here] delivered a winning speech tonight. It’s time for her newly minted detractors to shake it off?

Shake it off?  Her newly minted detractors?  What the hell is she talking about?

You tell me. 

I don’t know.

Straw man demolished

In response to a commercial calling attention to Obama’s links to unrepentant terrorist-bomber and 2006 praiser to his face of Venezuela’s Chavez, Dems asked in their own commercial:

“With all our problems, why is John McCain talking about the 60s, trying to link Barack Obama to radical Bill Ayers?” the Obama ad asks. “McCain knows Obama denounced Ayers’ crimes, committed when Obama was just 8 years old.”

The people that ask that have no idea the havoc an eight-year-old can cause.  They’ll never get away with this.  Barack the kid resonated with Ayers’s actions.  He even sent a donation.

And who how he gave his support at this crucial moment in A’s life in 1981, when he and Bernardine Dohrn walked out a court house free as birds?

Ayers, Dohrn in '81

Who’s who, what’s what in Georgia

“Virtually everyone is wrong” about who started it in Georgia, including APwrites Michael Totten from Tbilisi:

Georgia didn’t start it on August 7, nor on any other date. The South Ossetian militia started it on August 6 when its fighters fired on Georgian peacekeepers and Georgian villages with weapons banned by the agreement hammered out between the two sides in 1994. At the same time, the Russian military sent its invasion force bearing down on Georgia from the north side of the Caucasus Mountains on the Russian side of the border through the Roki tunnel and into Georgia. This happened before Saakashvili sent additional troops to South Ossetia and allegedly started the war.

Russia seen through Georgian eyes:

Peacekeeper Poster Tbilisi

Totten has his info from a Georgia govt. media advisor, vetted by U. of Montana teacher and author of three books about the Caucasus — Azerbaijan Diary, Georgia Diary and Chechnya Diary — Thomas Goltz, based on his near-20 years of being there.

Read on.

Nancy tries morality, flunks

These prelates know the score:

Now the full weight of the Catholic Church is coming down on Nancy Pelosi. Bravo to Cardinal Rigali and Bishop Lori who join Archbishop Chaput in setting an example for their fellow Church leaders. Now, how about the Bishop of San Francisco? The story:

It’s about Nutty Nancy telling the clue-free Meet the Press man what’s RC teaching and what isn’t, in the cause of her man the Big O., the deucedly clever chap whose pay level doesn’t cover human rights for little people.  She cited Augustine in support of a three-month rule.  The prelates:

In the Middle Ages, uninformed and inadequate theories about embryology led some theologians to speculate that specifically human life capable of receiving an immortal soul may not exist until a few weeks into pregnancy. While in canon law these theories led to a distinction in penalties between very early and later abortions, the Church’s moral teaching never justified or permitted abortion at any stage of development.

Oh.  In other words, Peggy Noonan is right:

We know when life begins. Everyone who ever bought a pack of condoms knows when life begins.

To put it another way, with conception something begins. What do you think it is? A car? A 1948 Buick?

The prelates continued:

These mistaken biological theories became obsolete over 150 years ago when scientists discovered that a new human individual comes into being from the union of sperm and egg at fertilization. In keeping with this modern understanding, the Church has long taught that from the time of conception (fertilization), each member of the human species must be given the full respect due to a human person, beginning with respect for the fundamental right to life.

It is about time someone called her and other Catholics on it who trade on their being Catholic for political gain.

Wall St. Journal’s Market Watch has the Rigali et al. text.  Catholic News Service is working on it.  Rush L. beat them all to it:

[T]his is just embarrassing. As I’ve often wondered, is she genuinely this uneducated, uninformed, silly, stupid, whatever — and I’ve concluded there isn’t a word to describe the status of her brain.  The Catholic Church doesn’t know? The Catholic Church hasn’t stipulated?

Well Rush, you can hit many a Catholic church on Sunday and be unsure in the matter.

Beware. Gas pollution coming.

Here’s a stunning summary of what Hugh Hewitt sees as the Veep Choice gaffe:

Talking the talk has been the key to Obama’s success, and in Slow Joe he found an older, far better traveled but equally prolix gas bag… For Obama, it is all about politics and words, elections and poses. Slow Joe is the perfect running mate on a perfect ticket for a party betting on wind to solve the energy crisis.”

Hewitt is found here, among other places.  Stout fella.  He is quoted above at Patriot Post, “the conservative journal of record.”

Big O. throws gauntlet with Big B. pick

Catholic wrinkle here, maybe of moment:

“Sadly, Joe Biden’s tenure in the United States Senate has been marked by steadfast support for legal abortion” [said Fidelis president Brian Burch in a news release].

During the recent Democratic primary campaign Biden [called himself] “a long-standing supporter of Roe v Wade and a woman’s right to choose.”

Thing is, will he be refused Communion?

Is O’s pick

of pro-abortion Catholic Joe Biden to be his V.P. running mate “. . . a slap in the face to Catholic voters” and [does it pose] a major challenge for American Catholics[?]

as Burch says, having 

declared that Barack Obama has “re-opened a wound among American Catholics” by picking a pro-abortion Catholic politician like Joe Biden.

He’s a “committed Catholic,” O. said Saturday in Springfield at the unveiling, and there’s a weasel phrase, having multiple meanings in today’s religio-spiritual market. 

For instance, I’m committed, but not to alleged “social justice” teaching as purveyed in papal encyclicals, most of which goes far beyond one’s Christian obligations to do anything and is bad policy to boot. 

Read Thomas E. Woods, Jr.’s The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy — come along with me — for a spirited refutation of various aspects of Rerum Novarum of 1891, Quadragesimo Anno 40 years later, and even JP2’s Laborem Exercens 50 years after QA, all of which veer into statism or least assign considerable blame to employers who don’t pay a “family wage.”

The amount of nonsense sold as Catholic belief in these matters is amazing.  As Woods notes on p. 78,

To be sure, the popes themselves have never claimed that a favorable attitude toward coercive labor unionism [to name one economic issue] constitutes an infallible moral teaching, but it is easy to come away from much popular exposition of Catholic social teaching with that impression.

Direct killing of the innocent is another matter, also to be sure.  A privileged position is assigned anti-abortionism, therefore, in the Catholic hierarchy (of values, not prelates).

In any case, Biden as Catholic pro-choice running mate for the decidedly pro-abortion born-alive-bill-killer Obama is bound to raise hackles on fish-eaters coast to coast who are not stuck in spurious social-justice considerations and can’t get around that protection-of-the-innocent business that undergirds anti-abortionism.

Wait for a very hot story, in any case, when Biden goes for Communion and gets a blessing instead.  On the other hand, don’t wait, because it won’t happen.

============

Reader D:

Yes, you’re right — Biden will pick an open-thinking church where Holy Communion is a right, not a privilege. Remember Kerry went to some “downtown Paulist Church” in Boston, I believe, where all God’s chillun can “take” Communion.

On the other hand, Reader B, who hates to capitalize:

by the guys in missouri for sure….  the same thing that happened to kerry will happen to him, i suspect.

Yes, Archbishop Burke of St. Louis, now in the Pope’s cabinet at Rome, nixed Kerry’s receiving, but K. did not test him, to my knowledge.

The B-Man unmasked

Here is Biden without hair!  Telling a questioner how smart he is (Biden, not the questioner) and giving his 1988 version of hope and change.  Garrulous fellow.

But he was fooling people!  The trouble with his outburst was “that [his] insecure academic boasts were almost all bogus,” as Mickey Kaus observes, looking back to 2003, when B. was considering entry into the 2004 race and a spoilsport noted various inconvenient data, part of a previous run:

In 1987, Biden quit the Democratic primary race early after the revelation that he had delivered, without attribution, passages from a speech by British Labor party leader Neil Kinnock.

A barrage of subsidiary revelations by the press also hammered Biden’s image: a serious plagiarism incident from his law-school years, boastful exaggerations of his academic record at a New Hampshire campaign event, and the discovery of other quotations in Biden’s speeches pilfered from past Democratic politicians. [Emphasis added]

So what?  So he’s a con man of the first water.  Can’t con men run?  Give the guy a break, OK?

Tags:

The little library that could

Wowie!  The UIC library is unsealing the records in its special collections!

The records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an organization that Obama chaired and that Ayers co-founded, will be made available to the public Tuesday, UIC said in a statement.

The U. says it “now has legal authority to allow public access to the material,” apparently without specifying this, per AP.  It “had fulfilled the terms of the gift” in 2002 of the records, says Sun-Times.  Again sans specification.

Chi Trib’s Mark Silva i-d’s Ayers as “a radical protestor” of the 60s, having looked himself in the mirror and decided the bomb business — “nonfatal,” he says, as does AP — goes like this: Ayers’s

Weatherman group took credit for bombings that included nonfatal blasts at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol four decades ago.

He reports (as he sees fit), we decide (he’s at best a dork).

Commenter John D on Silva’s piece:

I love how Mark Silva classifies the Weatherman bombings as “nonfatal” as if since they were nonfatal, that means the bombings were OK. Now, UIC spares the Tribune the embarrassment. Four years ago the Tribune sued to get Jack Ryan’s divorce papers exposed so the paper can destroy Ryan and open the doors to Obama. Today, the Tribune had no interest in getting these files opened.