Alinsky loved, Alinsky ruthless, Obama the MAN

In today’s Wednesday Journal, I ask Oak Parkers: Did you ever see so many political signs? The Big O has Oak Park in a hammerlock. But you John-and-Sarah supporters-don’t you just love her?-need not fear. Oak Park‘s Republican committeewoman, Marlene Lynch, has a few left of the ten (10!) signs she got from the Cook County party. She’d prefer not having her number given out, however. Republicans lie low in Oak Park.

Meanwhile, Big O signs metastasize, and so what? He’s most Oak Parkers’ beau ideal. Heck, I met him at a reception for him in an

Oak Park home in the mid-’90s, before few besides William Ayers, that unrepentant son of a ComEd CEO, knew his potential. He was running Annenberg Challenge, funding school programs in how to overthrow the government and helping ACORN register voters as only ACORN knows how-look them up under vote fraud. Little did I know, sipping wine and munching cheese, what a giant was in our midst. 

 

. . . .  There’s more more more here.

Impeaching Obama, latest of the big spenders, etc.

It’s too soon to get out your “Impeach Obama” buttons, but not too soon to call Colin Powell’s credentials into question or take careful note of Obama fund-raising, the biggest yet and the first since Watergate to go all-out.  Typical Democrat chutzpah, of course.  Soon as coast is clear, up to old tricks.  It’s the “Chicago-izing of the nation,” as commenter Margaret says in re: Pelosi, etc.

I might amend that, to “Cook County-izing,” with a nod to the Stroger hegemony, bidding fair to rival the Daleys, who of course have a hand in the county cookie jar.  The father headed the Cook County party as mayor, of course (so does the son and heir), the first to wear both crowns, and they say the son has put him to shame for sheer control of things.

So.  As to premature impeachment proceedings, we should note our favorite pollster, Zogby, with his within-margin-of-error Obama lead.  Yes!  Not to mention Gallup four days ago, with its also thin Obama lead. 

Then there’s the tax on businesses earning (or taking in?) $250G/year.  Which is it?  Does Obama know?  Hear Joe the Plumber:

Mr. Obama also muffed details of his own tax plan, confusing a small business’s revenue and net income [he told John Fund], and the tax rate that would apply under his proposals.

Joe had more to say about That One, reports Fund in WSJ.com Political Diary:

He also seemed hazy about the Flat Tax, put forward by Steve Forbes and Dick Armey a decade ago, confusing it with proposals for a national sales tax and saying the rate would have to go to 40%. “I was talking about one thing, and he was answering me about something else,” Mr. Wurzelbacher recalls.

The Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank in Chicago, points out that a flat tax would let Americans see exactly how much government costs in one easy, transparent and accountable tax. Mr. Obama’s reforms, in contrast, would only add to the thousands of loopholes, exemptions and complications of the current 67,000 page tax code. “A candidate for president should at least know the difference between a flat tax and a national sales tax,” Heartland concludes. “But both a flat tax and a national sales tax are head and shoulders over the convoluted tax system we have now.”

* Last night’s “Boston Legal” featured a full-throated endorsement of the idea that U.S. military are “not like us,” if we are the suited lawyers of this show, ignoring JAG lawyers.  Arguing before a judge whether the military could be sued for malpractice in a veterans’ hospital, the younger but not so young lawyer said wounded GI’s are “not our children” but children of poor people (who need protection), relying on “the canard that the our military is the last resort of the poor and uneducated.”  That’s show biz as those lefties understand it.

* In these hard times, we feature government bailouts or rescue packages or government investment — whatever — in private banks.  But protective tariffs can’t be far away:  “In a prolonged recession, gale-force winds of protectionism will blow,” say Princeton prof Aaron Friedberg and Commentary editor Gabriel Schoenfeld.

And with them will come withdrawalfrom the world stage,” leaving “a dangerous power vacuum” — what’s been called elsewhere economic isolation. 

* John Kerry is a natural-born cutup.  Here he is at the podium 10/20, having fun with dumb-question askers among our mediums:

“Barack got asked the famous boxers or briefs question,” Kerry went on. “I was tempted to say commando.”

. . . .

“Then they asked McCain and McCain said, ‘Depends,'” Kerry said to lots of laughter from the crowd.

* More on Barry Obama’s tax-unconsciousness:

He also seemed hazy about the Flat Tax, put forward by Steve Forbes and Dick Armey a decade ago, confusing it with proposals for a national sales tax and saying the rate would have to go to 40%. “I was talking about one thing, and he was answering me about something else,” Mr. Wurzelbacher recalls.

The Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank in Chicago, points out that a flat tax would let Americans see exactly how much government costs in one easy, transparent and accountable tax. Mr. Obama’s reforms, in contrast, would only add to the thousands of loopholes, exemptions and complications of the current 67,000 page tax code. “A candidate for president should at least know the difference between a flat tax and a national sales tax,” Heartland concludes. “But both a flat tax and a national sales tax are head and shoulders over the convoluted tax system we have now.”

* My question entirely, as in last month’s Wed. Journal column:

How do you create more jobs when you want to levy higher tax rates on the small business owners who are the nation’s primary employers?

Or as I put it:

However the cookie crumbles in November, when the final poll is taken, I’m a winner. Even if my man and woman come up short, I will get to watch a miracle-when Big O. and his Delaware sidekick create jobs while raising tax rates. He will truly be The Messiah if he pulls that off.

* This from PowerLine fits with my column of tomorrow, in which I speak of Saul Alinsky and his ends-and-means thinking.  The writer has shown how Obama lied when he said called it “absolutely not true” that he “launched [his] political campaign in William Ayers’ living room.”  He comments:

Barack Obama is obviously a candidate who believes that the end–his election–justifies any means, no matter how dishonest. He is not the first Presidential candidate to harbor such a conviction. There was a time, though, when newspaper reporters thought it was part of their job to keep such candidates honest, rather than enabling their deceit.

It does come back to the lemmings of the daily press and television.

When to stop growing

Here’s a very great thought that must not die a-borning: Out of Obama’s $250G limit on allowable gross income before being hit by higher tax rate can come some very good things for tax lawyers and accountants, who will be hired on to warn the business owner when to stop making and selling his product and hiring people. 

These guys can make a bundle at this, and their charges will be well worth it to employers coast to coast.  Who’s giving Obama these ideas anyway.  Maybe a hard-hitting Chi Trib or Sun-Times investigation possibility here.

Home in Indiana with Sarah

This Tribune fellow earns his spurs as a card-carrying NYT imitator with this page one piece about Indiana, in which he kisses Palin off with a paragraph or so.

Contrast it — Glory be! — with this p-1 blaster in Sun-Times that seems to do her justice.  To do the story justice, that is.  She’s still news, isn’t she?  Not for Chi Trib.

Pallasch and Byrne do it right, getting the other side’s position along the way, which is how it’s done among professionals, I have long understood. 

“ACORN is under investigation for rampant voter fraud in 13 states. ACORN received over $800,000 from the Obama campaign,” Palin said. All 13 are swing states like Indiana.

Then the opposite position:

Obama has said the $800,000 was for voter canvassing during the primary election, not for voter registration during the general election.

“We have not worked with ACORN at all in the general election,” Obama spokesman Ben Labolt said. “Rather than make these false, desperate attacks, . . .

. . . Blah, blah, blah.

But the $800,000 is fungible, is it not?  Nothing left over for ACORN in the general?  How do we know that?

Moreover, ACORN has severe internal-honesty problems of its own, having fired the founder’s brother for making off with a million of its hard-begged money.  The founder, a campus radical in the ‘60s, himself had to quit, though it’s doubtful he’s not still in their pitchin’ for ACORN and Obama.  Here he is:

Wade Rathke is seen in a Tuesday Feb. 26, 2002 file photo, in New Orleans. A lawsuit filed in August by two ACORN board members accuses ACORN founder and former chief organizer Wade Rathke of either concealing or failing to properly report that his brother Dale embezzled around $948,000 from New Orleans-based ACORN and affiliated charitable organizations in 1999 and 2000. (AP Photo/Bill Haber, File)

Some of the dirty, from AP yesterday:

Leaders of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now are locked in a legal dispute stemming from allegations that the brother of the group’s founder misappropriated nearly $1 million of the nonprofit’s money several years ago.

The embezzlement case, a recent revelation to some board members, has spawned a lawsuit and set off a power struggle inside ACORN at a time when the liberal group’s voter registration practices are the subject of fraud investigations and fodder for presidential campaign attacks.

I know I should be spelling out the McCain health care package, not mooning over Reform Now in its more virulent aspects, but with money siphoned hand over fist by an insider, doesn’t ACORN look like an embarrassing support group for O., who lawyered for and trained them and gave them lots a bucks — also hard–begged, by the way?

Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s interim chief organizer, called the lawsuit “a distraction from us marshaling our forces to deal with the Republican right-wing attacks” over ACORN’s voter registration.

When in doubt, changed the subject.

Pelosi, ACORN, etc.

Balance of power

is what more people want (48%) than want one-party rule (41%). This is a big, big issue. Dems will probably add to their majorities in both houses, even gain a supermajority in the senate, making their plans filibuster-proof. So McCain presents himself as “a buffer” between the people and the Reid-Pelosi combo. Congress limps along with 13% approval rating, vs. Bush’s 29%, and 23% like Pelosi, vs. 30% who like Bush.

So hang her around Obama’s neck:

“Were my opponent elected with a Democratic Congress in power, not only would there be no check on my opponent’s reckless economic policies, there would be considerable pressure on him to tax and spend even more,” [McCain] said earlier this week in Blue Bell, Pa.

That’s the idea. Tell your friends.

Voting early, often:

Tell them about vote fraud too, if they haven’t heard. It’s spelled A-C-O-R-N this season.

“It remains our belief that American citizens should be guaranteed that their legitimate votes are not wiped away by illegally cast ballots,” McCain campaign manager Rick Davis said in a statement Friday.

Such a good point. Yowling Dems speak of disenfranchisement — of felons, etc. — as if that’s the issue. But every fraudulent vote for their man or woman negates a legal vote for the other. It’s like jobs for precinct door-knocking. They are jobs of which someone else is deprived.

And sometimes the piper has to be paid.

Reid-Pelosi around O’s neck?

Quick, before I forget this: Obama should be saddled with Reid and Pelosi at least as much as he wants to saddle McCain with Bush.  Two long years ago, they got their majorities, and look where we are.

Well, I looked that up and found my idea is old.  Repubs were about to use

“Pelosi-Reid-Obama” in the all-in-the-same-breath way that Democrats now use “Bush-McCain” — to make the parties’ popular candidates indistinguishable from their less beloved incumbents.

Did they?  Did McCain?  Well, here’s McCain today in Miami, among other things defending Joe the Plumber:

Let me give you the state of the race today. We have 18 days to go. We’re 6 points down. The national media has written us off. Senator Obama is measuring the drapes, and planning with Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid to raise taxes, increase spending, take away your right to vote by secret ballot in labor elections, and concede defeat in Iraq. But they forgot to let you decide. My friends, we’ve got them just where we want them.

And here’s a chilling reminder of what’s ahead if Obama wins:

If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.

[Review & Outlook] AP

Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven’t since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.

In brief, this is coming:

WSJ on super Dems

That union card check means no more secret ballot in union elections and mandatory unionization that works this way:

The bill also imposes a compulsory arbitration regime that results in an automatic two-year union “contract” after 130 days of failed negotiation. The point is to force businesses to recognize a union whether the workers support it or not. This would be the biggest pro-union shift in the balance of labor-management power since the Wagner Act of 1935.

Not bad for a community organizer.

Who now reads Shakman?

Obama’s manager Axelrod in a Chi Trib op-ed in 2005 commenting on, actually objecting to, prosecution of patronage workers in Chicago:

Indeed, the decades-old Shakman federal consent decree proscribes hiring and firing for political reasons. But as I listened to [U.S. Attorney Patrick] Fitzgerald’s news conference after the government brought charges against the city workers, I realized he was saying something much more.

Fitzgerald proclaimed his vision of a day when the recommendations of elected officials, business, labor and community leaders will no longer count – a day when we entirely remove politics from government. And he seemed to be declaring his intention to use the criminal code to enforce that vision.

Yes, and if Obama wins, how long will Fitzgerald last in Chicago?

Read more of this at NBC5–Chicago’s Division Street blog by Steve Rhodes, who carefully and with all deliberation lays out the Obama-Daley connection.

Believe me, happy days will be there again among Cook County Democrats when The One comes marching into Washington, the laurel wreath on his head.  This town ain’t ready for reform, and neither is the Big O.

Funny papers

If I had a dog named Zero, I’d say “Gloryosky” to him, having discovered that yesterday’s Chi Trib made not ‘arf bad reading, though I’ll be darned if I can come up with anything astonishing.  In fact, the only part I saved for my next-day story is the former Metro section, now “Chicagoland,” with the Fry’s electronics display ad telling us about ACER NETBOOK Aspire One 8.9″ Intel Atom N270 1.6 GHz 1GB RAM 120GB Hard Drive Webcam 802.11G Wireless 2.19lbs Windows XP HOME.  For a lousy $349.99, sans rebate! (But nothing about wi-fi capacities.  Hmm.) 

[Later: Wrong-o.  Was thinking of something else.  As Andy K. says in the comment, “802.11G Wireless” means wi-fi.  As the (white) kid said to me the other day on the sidewalk, “My bad.”  (In Oak Park you pick up the lingo.)]

So what did Boy Genius do?  The one you’re talkin’ to right here?  He frittered away the day walking around and (not kidding) doing some work for pay until it was bedtime, and then what?  Next day called up www.frys.com and found the beautiful item was Sold Out!  So back he is to Square One in re: buying self a nice XP-fitted laptop — with wi-fi.  More later on this incredible adventure.

Editorially speaking, Trib’s Chicagoland had a revelatory piece by Dan Mihalopoulos, “A multiplicity of mouthpieces,” i.e. spokespeople, with lots about Marilyn Katz, fingered by Kass in his column as a “former ’60s radical” who

during the violent protests of the 1968 Democratic National Convention here . . . was the security chief for the radical Students for a Democratic Society. She once advocated throwing studded nails in front of police cars, back in the SDS days when the group was alleged to have thrown cellophane bags full of human excrement at cops and cans of urine and golf balls impaled with nails.

Ah Marilyn, we hardly know you from those palmy days, now you’ve come so far up the occupational tree as to flack for Mayordaley II, not to mention The One (“that one,” said McCain, not dismissively enough, in the last debate, and howls went up ‘round the world from various apparatchiks), for whom she dishes sweet nothings for the unsuspecting (in any case compliant) medium performers.

“What Bill Ayers and [former Black Panther, now U.S. Rep.] Bobby Rush . . . did 40 years ago has nothing to do with [the presidential campaign],” Katz was quoted as saying in the Chicago Sun-Times in April. “[Ayers] has a national reputation. He lectures at Harvard [University] and Vassar [College].”

Now wait a minute, as The One says, setting a questioner straight.  Vassar had Commie scum (make that dingbat) Angela Davis as baccalaureate speaker for the 1993 graduation, so don’t give us that stuff, Marilyn dear.  I vass dere and heard her tell the mush-brained graduates and the non-mush-brained among them that Marxism was not dead (to applause).  And the school had a lecture series named after her in the early 70s, part of its Black Studies program, yes!

The whole M-Katz business — her radical, violence-connected past stemming from, we presume, her all-around impatience and self-absorption now morphed into highly viable political strategy aimed at achieving the same social-control things as before — shows how those creepy people can gain acceptance and traction in the world as it works.

Do we think Mayordaley II worries about radicalism of people who support him?  Do we think Obama, cut of the same cloth, worries about it?  No.  These people know how to get things done, and that’s the issue for them.  The rest is nonsense.

My newly found pro-tem grudging respect for the new Chi Trib can be summed up: you get used to the format.  I knew I would, assuming it’s not wildly mixed up.  The content is another story, but what else is new?

However: There was the page-one reefer on Friday (10 Oct), over the top, to a Kass column “on the end of the Pool Boy probe,” supposed to be on page 2.  It wasn’t.  Not in my hard copy.  It’s here but wasn’t there.  Odd, to say the least.

Pool boy is “a top political operative for Mayor Richard Daley who ran a patronage army for the mayor and was the city airports operation boss.”  Pool Boy because a few years back he dug one in his back yard that flooded neighbors’ yards.  He made a call and got ComEd to hook up a special power source for his house when power was out for the neighbors.  Or many of us presume that.

“Stupid,” the mayor called it at the time, shrinking from “venal” or “disgusting.”  He saves “disgusting” or its synonyms for federal conviction of his lieutenant, a good family man from Nativity BVM in Bridgeport — for running a job scam at the Hall.  [Later: Andy K again.  Nativity of Our Lord.  Sorry.]

Still, that was quite an admission by Daley, that his airports executive did something stupid, and Kass was clearly impressed.  He notes that the airports boss got fired immediately, before the inspector general could knock on his door, going with a company that sells a lot of stuff to the airports.  Close one there.  Is he a good family man?

Many of us think Pool Boy put in a call.  No, the true version, passed on by Kass, is that the whole thing was coincidental.  We know because ComEd began a 63–day investigation into the matter, which like the Hundred Year’s War could not be called that until it was over, which it was when Kass got an email from a Com Ed v.p., who explained that in this matter

allegations of preferential treatment are simply not true. [She underlined “not true.”] A crew was not [she underlined “not”] directed to the home of David Ochal, former deputy director of aviation, on Wednesday, Aug. 6, to deliver or install a generator or restore power to his home. However, in light of the investigation, the company is using the opportunity to reinforce with employees its storm restoration protocols and implement some process improvements to close some gaps in our reporting and tracking procedures.”

Kass, of course, was delighted. 

You skeptics must be ashamed of yourselves. It wasn’t political clout that got Generator X to Pool Boy’s home. What were you thinking?

He gave the v.p. a jingle, as she had suggested, and got a long, detailed explanation at the close of which Kass, seeking to sum it all up, said, So it’s a coincidence?

Davis [the v.p.] paused on the phone. It was a long pause, at least four seconds.

Was this a coincidence?

“You can call it that if you want to,” said Davis from ComEd.

Why then did Ochal resign? Kass asked, incorrigibly.

Well this woman’s portfolio did not extend that far, like Obama’s as to when you’re old enough to have rights.  “That’s a question you’d have to ask Mr. Ochal. I can’t speak for him,” she said.

Get that long pause on “coincidence.”  This v.p. was not born yesterday.  She could spout nonsense with the rest of them, but she would not fall for that one.  No sirree.

Davis is Tabrina Davis,

former acting director of public affairs at Cook County Hospital, [who was] appointed public information officer [for the Chi Board of Ed in November, 1995]. Salary: $65,000.

So.  She’s political, just the one to catch flak for Com Ed in these troubled times.

One of the late John “Stroger’s soldiers”?  Maybe then, but now she consorts with high social rollers, fellow and sister members of the board of Chicago Children’s Advocacy Center.  She’s an urbane, for all I know lovely person, a joy to know, and ready to tell it like it is when delivering results of a 63–day (!) investigation. 

Congratulations, Tabrina!  But what the heck happened to the hard-copy-Trib version of your investigation as explained by John Kass?  I’ve got another “Gloryosky” in me if you have any ideas to share.

What Sarah knew

Sarah has done me a big personal favor by smoking out David Brooks et al., “conservative” mainstreamers who can’t stand her.  Why a favor?  Because it’s given me a whole new reason for dismantling my respect for those hifalutin guys who have been elevated. 

She has been the bird dog who flushed the pheasants — my man Krauthammer among them! — so as to relieve us peasants of our misplaced sense of allegiance, though I’m still a K-hammer fan, using the even-Homer-nods system.

Meanwhile, she’s on the pan in Alaska, though not yet baked, it appears.  No crime but abuse of governor’s power is alleged by allegedly non-partisan commission.  Why am I skeptical?  Partly because I’m partisan and loathe to believe bad things about my candidate, but moreso because Chi Trib and Sun-Times both blasted it out yesterday as front-page items, which I knew they would when I saw the news on the ‘Net the night before.

From one of the lawyers at Powerline Blog:

The report does not convincingly show that the Palins were driven by the desire to obtain a personal benefit, as opposed to the desire to rid the police force of a bad apple about whom they had personal knowledge. However, Todd Palin’s persistence suggests that, at a minimum, there probably was a personal agenda in the mix.

In the end, it seems to me that Gov. Palin did not exercise particularly good judgment in this matter. But the case that she abused her power by violating the ethics statute and/or that she fired the public safety commissioner because he wouldn’t act against Wooten has not been made.

Nonetheless, the weakly reasoned “Troopergate” report may well represent another nail in the McCain-Palin coffin.

Calm reason here?  Powerline people are very sharp and have had doubts about Sarah P. from the start.  See also Wall Street J:

A long-awaited Alaska legislative report concluded that . . . Gov. Sarah Palin, abused her authority and broke state ethics law by trying to remove her former brother-in-law from his job as a state trooper.

But the report also concluded that the Republican governor did not unlawfully fire her public-safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, who said he had been pressured to oust the trooper, Mike Wooten. The report said other factors were involved in Mr. Monegan’s controversial dismissal.

New Criterion editor Roger Kimball goes further:

Surgeon General’s Warning: do not drive or attempt to operate machinery while contemplating the just-published 260-odd-page report orchestrated by Hollis French, Alaska legislator and supporter of Barack Obama. French had originally intended to release it October 31, for maximum effect on the campaign. Other legislators prevented that, but the report came out yesterday and guess what? It’s like Oakland according to Gertrude Stein, i.e., there’s no there there, Hollis, no smoking gun, no damning evidence, no nothing except 1) evidence of wasting the taxpayers’ money and 2) engaging in a clumsy smear campaign against Sarah. (Don’t you love the way Team Obama labels every criticism of The Dear One a “smear”: Google “Obama” and “smears”: 1,280,000 items in .13 seconds.)

French hired Steve Branchflower to do the investigating.  It’s his report.  Kimball cites another commentator:

The Branchflower Report is a series of guess and insupportable conclusions drawn by exactly one guy, and it hasn’t been approved or adopted or endorsed by so much as a single sub-committee of the Alaska Legislature, much less any kind of commission, court, jury, or other proper adjudicatory body.

It’s an “episode of political theater that would make Josef Stalin blush,” says this commentator, one Bill Dyer, “ethics violation alleged by partisan hacks,” says another, one Jules Crittenden.

I find these people on the ‘Net, of course, though I’ve been reading Kimball at least since his landmark study of higher-ed corruption, Tenured Radicals: How Politics has Corrupted our Higher EducationLike Kimball they are thoughtful and literate.

Then we have Chi Trib and Sun-Times, who are in the narrative here, part of it as always.  NY Times and to lesser extent Wash Post and their imitators coast to coast have been alerting us to Palin problems for some time now, breathlessly awaiting “troopergate” news, as if to relive the days when Bill Clinton used his state troopers as procurers

Breathlessly they waited, as they did for news dug up about Rep. Barney Frank’s sleeping figuratively and otherwise with Fannie Mae, your friendly government-created mortgage company, the enemy of all that’s fiscally sound, government-created and government-unregulated?  Oh no, much more breathlessly than that.

Honey, pass the whole wheat, but keep it short

Another beautiful day, heading for 75, the young woman told me at Bread Kitchen.  Even with a seasonal crispness to contend with, this coffee drinker repaired to a sidewalk table, today with a slice of honey whole wheat — so big a slice that he took some of it home with him, for depositing in the fridge door under wraps.

Being under wraps is not always a bad thing, by the way.  Joe Biden seems to be staying that way in the current campaign, and it’s a good idea.  He’s there for ballast (not for the Connecticut vote), supplying what Dems may think is gravitas, a Latin word that does not mean gravity.  It had its day an election or so ago, so why bring it up here? 

Because the Boy Wonder is among us, clean and articulate, as Biden said back in primary-campaign days.  He is with us now for at least 24 days more, if not for an eternity beyond that.  He has marvelous miraculous things in mind for us, such as raising taxes and creating jobs at the same time.  He also has money by the carload, having reneged on his pledge to take public money and let it go at that.  This is allowing him to flood airwaves with his inspiring message.  Tsk, tsk.

His armies of the day and night are doing yeoman work.  I mean the mainstreamers, who are setting new records, laying pretense aside as they huff and puff.

I was in an email group discussion the other day with ex-newsies bemoaning the fate of Chi Trib.  One of them made a blog posting out of it.  I’m the one who said he subscribes to the Wall Street Journal these days.  I am not in there with my tentative, toe-in-water comment that USA Today-type format may be more suitable for the daily newspaper.

Unwilling to let this light bulb burn out too quickly, and blithely (if in no other way) unaware of who else may have said this a long time ago, I do want to pursue it, with this change: Make that tabloid format.  The Sun-Times has been in that format, as we know, as was the Chicago Times before merging with Marshall Field’s Sun, a broadsheet, in 1948.

The tabloid better suits the spot-item character of the newspaper.  The broadsheet (a la Chi Trib, if the term is new to you), on the other hand, is an incitement to blather.  Add to that the dearth of sharp, unyielding city and copy deskers who make it their business to put things in English, as Chi Daily News’s Bill Mooney used to say, and you have at best a warm bath and certainly not the needle-sharp shower that a good newspaper provides.

Chi Trib, on yet another hand, is flirting with tabloid-style content and treatment (and layout, when it comes to big, BIG headshots) but remains the same old big-page paper, except not as well organized.  I have no idea what they should do over there.  Times are perilous. 

No idea except that they go looking for the hardest-ass copy editors in the market, people who don’t give a shit who wins the election or whether the world burns up or freezes down or whether there are fewer black baseball players or white basketball players or all sorts of fever-producing issues that tell us WHERE THEY STAND.

Pleeez, I am (we are) hungry for items of info.  We don’t care what they think.  They should just tell us what’s happening, in raw form if necessary.  And keep it short.  Make nothing in the paper over 500 words, said a Daily News sub-editor to me years ago who went on to a long career at the Atlanta Constitution after the News folded in 1978. 

Even then, even there, it was probably a minority opinion.  But consider the discipline involved in reporters’ and editors’ keeping things that short, how such a strict norm would make them ask themselves what’s important, what do straphangers, a readership Bill Mooney kept in mind, want to know about this?

Continue reading “Honey, pass the whole wheat, but keep it short”