Rahm E., what a guy! Danny D. too. Whence comes such another?

Say Rahm E. gave a million to his alma matter, which let’s say is NU (it’s not). Fine.  Say he gave $900G to Adler Planetarium.  Philanthropists do that and get good space in local papers. Say he adopts Milwaukee Avenue, as highway signs urge adopting stretches of highway, and coughs up another $8 million.  All of it would be fine. He did it all, in fact, but not with his own money. With other people’s money in his capacity as a Congress Member!

Writing from Oak Park, I must ask, What about our own man in DC, Danny K. Davis, who in 2006 preened himself and was warmly appreciated in a Village Hall town hall-style meeting, in a very expensive suit, bragging (and later being bragged about, I am sure) that he got us $400G to pay for considering capping the Eisenhower?

In DC, that jumbo ATM for the nation, Davis is the man from Illinois-7th, the entire West Side and beyond, for which he goes begging. For FY 2008, the year whence came earmarks in the just-presidentially-signed $410 billion spending bill (budget), Davis requested $3,935,000 as a solo endeavor, of $41,819,000 in all, including joint requests with other Congress members of $37,884,000.

Where else can a guy like him, who never worked at a for-profit job, get that kind of money to spread around — and preen himself on in a town-hall meeting? To be elected to Congress, ah, such a consummation to be wished! Such a bonanza for the public-spirited citizen in expensive suits!

Davis comes by his not-for-profit status honestly, having joined the socialist New Party by September 1998 and received its enthusiastic support. Indeed, he was praised by Democratic Socialists of America as “an old friend of DSA.” So was Obama, for that matter, who also enjoyed DSA support in his 1996 quest for a state senate seat.

But I digress. The point is that Davis can have no problem with earmarks, having lived off public money his whole professional life.

F.L. Wright, Archbishop Tutu, Gary Sinise, spanking

A Wisconsin housekeeper stiffed by the skinflint architect Frank Lloyd Wright, referring to immoral goings-on at Taliesin: “Sin and pay” OK, “sin and no pay” not OK.

It’s in a review by Tom Shippey of T.C. Boyle’s novel The Women in the 3/6/09 Times Literary Supplement. All in all, the review is quite a shoot-down as I read it, at best ambivalent.

Final words:

At the end of each section you really don’t know whether to laugh or cry, and the way Boyle tells the story, that feeling gets stronger every time. And that, I think, is why the telling is the way it is.

Clever without turning cerebral, passionate without forfeiting emotional range; when there are novels like this to read, why would anyone bother with Aga sagas [household melodramas centered on the kitchen and domestic crises] or Sex and the City [Sarah J. Parker and friends]?

That said, the ambivalence fades away. In Shippey’s view, Boyle has authored a potboiler — in several meanings of that serviceable figure.

Shippey, if not also Boyle, presents Wright as a bounder of the first water, with no socially or other redeemable features but his genius.

* Today ChiTrib and Sun-Times have (Archbishop) Tutu the Clown scolding newsies for pressing Daley on plane trips taken for free from highly suspect donors: “I will absolve you and make you holy,” says Tutu.

* Yesterday Gary Sinise was questioned aggressively by a Trib writer about Brian dePalma’s Iraq war movie, to which Sinise, a supporter of the military, objected on unfairness grounds.

Sinise, briefed on the film and knowing dePalma, hadn’t seen it? And this? and that? It’s always a surprise when a reporter pushes a celebrity that way.

Robert K. Elder, the reporter in question, may be an exception. He did have fun with NPR’s Ira Glass in an LA Times piece in 2000, peppering him with nervy questions.

* Yesterday in S-T Mary Mitchell said spanking is “obviously not a black thing,” though she supplied the black word for it, as if it is, “whupping.” (That’s a black word?) She means it’s not more prevalent among blacks than others?

But Rev. Geo. Clements told me in the 70s that it was, in an interview about corporate punishment at his Holy Angels school on the South Side, which he claimed was the world’s biggest Catholic elementary school and where whupping was always an option.

On not stuffing things down throats, etc.

Warren Buffett speaking [ht WSJ.com’s Political Diary]:

[T]he Republicans have an obligation to regard this as an economic war and to realize you need one leader and, in general, support of that. But I think that the Democrats when they’re calling for unity on a question this important, they should not use it to roll the Republicans. . . . You can’t expect people to unite behind you if you’re trying to jam a whole bunch of things down their throat.

* More: One way for small towns to save money is to merge, to realize economies of scale, reports WSJ.  However,

Despite the popularity of merging, it’s rarely easy. Neighboring cities often have different property values, tax rates and levels of government service. People with higher property values often worry that sharing with less-expensive districts will lead to worse schools and fewer government services. More broadly, communities with healthy finances often aren’t eager to bail out neighboring cities in trouble.

So if you were looking for an Oak Park-River Forest to go with the longstanding OPRF High School, don’t — any more than for a River Forest High School.  There was briefly the latter, 1946 to 1949, when 330 or so RF students attended the school as guests of River Forest Community High School District 223, which paid their way.

D-223 lost its cachet, however, and in 1949 was created District 200.  This brought things back to what had been normal since 1899.  At this time no man mentions a separate school without becoming an island or merely a flapper of gums.

* Yet more: The author writes “with clarity and pace, unfettered by historiography,” says J.P.D. Cooper in Times Lit Supplement 2/27/09, reviewing Stephen Alford’s Burghley: William Cecil at the court of Elizabeth I, a life of the man who ran things for QE1.  The clarity and pace part sounds good, and I can do without superfluous historiography; so it looks like a good one, at least if you can stomach his persecution of Catholics and execution of Mary Queen of Scots.

As Cooper says, commending Burghley/Cecil for statesmanship,

Elizabeth had hoped that a quiet assassination might remove the need for a public trial.  Burghley’s instinct was sounder, that justice had to be seen to be done.

Those were the days.  Cooper also notes Burghley’s “conformity to Catholicism under Mary when so many Protestants went into exile.”  Fast on his feet, that fellow.

* Yet more: A more savory account is that of Margaret Roper, daughter of Thomas More, the English chancellor who did anything but get ahead by going along, being beheaded by Henry VIII in a matter of conscience.  He was the man for all seasons, but behind the man was the daughter, learned and accomplished and encouraging of him to the end, working past soldiers to give him a final hug in the Tower.

Author John Guy, in his A Daughter’s Love: Thomas and Margaret More, “perhaps goes too far when he suggests that Margaret might have been able to avert the Reformation,” says TLS reviewer Miranda Kaufmann (2/27/09).  She was “the one person in England . . . who could match Tyndale as a translator and stylist, and could be relied on to conform to Catholic teaching and doctrine . . .  But . . . she was a woman, so it never entered [church authorities’] heads,” Guy wrote.

She was able enough to correct an edition of the letters of St. Cyprian by their family’s friend and major creator of the Renaissance, Erasmus — at sixteen!  Her father, no slouch as we know, his Utopia (the Happy Republic, a Philosophical Romance) an apt case in point, had home-schooled her and her siblings, teaching them Latin and Greek.

His friend Erasmus, by the way, ruled himself out of Thomas More-style heroism, writing in 1521, 14 years before More’s beheading, “Mine was never the spirit to risk my life for the truth.”  He feared he would “behave like Peter” when trouble came — the Peter who produced the triple denial of Jesus.  “When popes and emperors make the right decisions, I follow, which is godly; if they decide wrongly, I tolerate them, which is safe.”

Start out your week with an insight

Natasha Julius, of the ever-reliable Beachwood Reporter, has an announcement:

Market Update
Following President Obama’s lead, we have decided to rename this segment “Change Watch.” By the way, the president might want to check his own portfolio, because Change seems to have been somewhat overvalued and Hope is positively in the shitter.

It’s keen insights such as that which we miss in our Metro Daily Hard Copy publications and their digital offshoots.

First Dubya, then effete cool guy meets elite men, women

George Dubya’s farewell to the Marines, vs. Barack Obama’s first appearance as president:

Here we have an illuminating contrast: the United States Marines greeting President George W. Bush on Labor Day versus the Marines greeting President Obama at Camp Lejeune last week.  . . . .

They know who’s on their side.

————-

A day or so later:  A dissenting view of the two presumably telling videos comes from Greyhawk, of the milblog Mudville Gazette, who says it’s a put-up job: Obama’s audience was standing at attention, for one thing, and presumably you can’t get the spontaneity shown in the Bush video.  That and the paste-up nature of the contrasting video made Greyhawk, who is regularly cited by the libertarian Instapundit, very suspicious.

However, from Mrs. Greyhawk comes a link to Amy Proctor — hey, I’m just getting to know these folks myself — who runs the whole CNN video (at “Bottom Line Upfront”) and concludes it was an “embarrassing response” that Obama got.  It was the CNN anchor who called it “tepid,” remember.  I’d just as soon let the Greyhawks argue it out, but I am leaning (back) towards my initial reaction. 

Of course, I do think Obama is a disaster waiting to happen for us all, and that may influence me.  What do you think?

Superman

Cocky Locky is finding matters more complicated than he thought:

Sources close to the White House say Mr Obama and his staff have been “overwhelmed” by the economic meltdown and have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.

British officials, meanwhile, admit that the White House and US State Department staff were utterly bemused by complaints that the Prime Minister should have been granted full-blown press conference and a formal dinner, as has been customary. They concede that Obama aides seemed unfamiliar with the expectations that surround a major visit by a British prime minister.

Oh that British visit.  There’s hostility to the Brits among staff:

The real views of many in Obama administration were laid bare by a State Department official involved in planning the Brown visit, who reacted with fury when questioned by The Sunday Telegraph about why the event was so low-key.

The official dismissed any notion of the special relationship, saying: “There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.”

On the other hand,

The apparent lack of attention to detail by the Obama administration is indicative of what many believe to be Mr Obama’s determination to do too much too quickly.

We know what that is: transform the economy into Euro-style low-growth stagnancy, with comcomitant 30% drop in living standards (says Michael Boskin of Stanford and Hoover Institution in Wall St. Journal).

The Sunday Telegraph understands that one of Mr Obama’s most prominent African American backers, whose endorsement he spent two years cultivating, has told friends that he detects a weakness in Mr Obama’s character.

“The one real serious flaw I see . . . is that he thinks he can manage all this,” the well-known figure told a Washington official, who spoke to this newspaper. “He’s underestimating the flood of things that will hit his desk.”

A Democratic strategist, who is friends with several senior White House aides, revealed that the president has regularly appeared worn out and drawn during evening work sessions with senior staff in the West Wing and has been forced to make decisions more quickly than he is comfortable.

He’s gonna trip one of these days, and the bloom will be off the rose.

This board wants to hold the line

An Oak Park-River Forest High School board member reminds readers in an Oak Leaves guest essay (which ran several weeks ago in the Wednesday Journal of OP & RF) of the board’s now-weeks-old resolution to keep tax rates as they are for nine years:

In its regular January . . . meeting, the board passed a unanimous resolution . . . that it will undertake a major shift in its long-range financial planning . . .  It . . . is likely that the district will have spent its reserves and will probably have to ask the taxpayers for another tax increase by 2018.

The . . . resolution was a signal of [the board’s] intention to halt, insofar as possible, its growth in expenditures . . . over the next nine years and to keep . . . within its income, without requiring another tax increase.

The matter has special pertinence in view of ambivalence on the issue on the part of three board candidates, each a non-incumbent, at the APPLE forum of 3/3.  Ralph Lee, who wrote the essay, says the resolution has been unreasonably ignored by local media.

Spending priorities are in order, he wrote, inviting debate about “this new policy direction” in an effort to gain “approval of a majority of voters.”  Absent this approval, he said, “the board or, if necessary, . . . the voters” can devise a new one.

Politely, Lee was offering a take-or-leave proposition.

The board has also gone ahead with plans to privatize the maintenance crew, and these candidates were explicitly opposed to that.  Two mentioned the 2018 date and a third spoke of “other ways of cost containment” than privatization.  The issue is bound to arise in forums yet to come before the 4/7 election.

Wuxtry, wuxtry, high school candidates hit hot issue

High school election coming up in OP & RF, where the elite meet to learn.

For 10 or 15 minutes last night (3/3) at a forum sponsored by APPLE, the black parents group, at Oak Park & River Forest High School, six candidates for the OPRF board firmly assured 70 or so listeners of their full support, in some cases overriding support, for early-childhood education.

“It’s not an option to ignore any [educational] level,” said Rosa Higgs, a teacher. “I know that when I am on the board, OPRF will reach out to every pre-school. We are all one learning community,” . . . .

My Oak Park Items blog at the Wednesday Journal has the definitive account.  Other issues: the black-white achievement gap, disciplining of black boys, honors courses and black students, outsourcing (privatizing) maintenance work.