We’re all John Maynards now

Gotcha, John Maynard:

John Maynard Keynes often employed flowery language like “animal spirits” and “liquidity trap” to describe things he did not understand. He was, after all, more of a bureaucrat than an economist. In fact, he would best be described as an anti-economist because he eschewed things like supply and demand and held the opinion that government could run the economy.

He be the devil-may-care proponent of our newly resurrected borrow-and-spend philosophy.  He may rest in peace again some day, but not yet.

Our left-wing president

Looking, acting, talking like a . . . duck?

President Obama showed his hand this week when The New York Times wrote that he is considering converting the stock the government owns in our country’s banks from preferred stock, which it now holds, to common stock.

This seemingly insignificant change is momentous. It means that the federal government will control all of the major banks and financial institutions in the nation. It means socialism.

Dick Morris cutting to the chase.

A glimpse of president yet to come . . .

My Wednesday Journal column:

In early spring of 2013, the new U.S. president, Seumas McDoherty-O’Rahilly, was invited to give the commencement address at the University of Notre Dame. He had run on an anti-hope-and-change platform, as had all other candidates, so toxic had these words become in the climate of cynicism that had developed when runaway governmental borrowing and spending plunged the nation into Jimmy Carter-style stagflation.

Etc.

Later: 

From Reader D: 

I believe I heard Rush say recently: Obama’s the only American president who “hates our country.”
 
That’s why he doesn’t flinch when a 2-bit dictator denounces us and insults us in his presence. In my opinion Obama buys the rhetoric, the same way he bought Jeremiah Wright’s venom against Amerika for 20 years. We’re in serious doo-doo.
 
Right.  He’s not shocked, having heard it all before.

Travels with Barack

The view from Jerusalem:

[I]f Obama feels that he has to be the one to greet a man like Chavez, must it be with the kind of ear-to-ear grin that one might show girl scouts selling cookies? It must surely be disheartening for those who suffer oppression in countries like Venezuela, Cuba and Saudi Arabia to see the American president backslapping their oppressors when these victims have always looked up to the United States as their champions.

There was more, as we know, including:

the incident of President Barack Obama seeming to bow before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia at the G-20 summit in London. The president’s people denied it was a bow, but it certainly was a sign of great deference from the American president to the dictator of a country who just six weeks ago sentenced a 75-year-old woman to 40 lashes for having been secluded with her nephew after he delivered bread to her home.

And then there’s the overture to Cuba,

a country which engages in systemic human rights abuses, including torture, arbitrary imprisonment, unfair trials and extrajudicial executions. Censorship is so extensive that Cubans face five-year prison sentences for connecting to the Internet illegally. And not only is emigration illegal, but even discussing it carries a six-month prison sentence.

He’s too bad to be true:

While he was campaigning for the presidency, Obama promised, “As president I will recognize the Armenian genocide.” But in a press conference in Ankara with President Abdullah Gul, he refused to use the word “genocide” when challenged by a reporter on the issue. Yet, it was Obama’s early foreign policy adviser Samantha Power of Harvard who wrote A Problem from Hell, the definitive book on the American non-intervention in repeated 20th-century genocides, beginning with the Armenian genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Turks which killed 1.5 million between the years of 1915 and 1923.

The book changed the writer’s life, he says, he being a Jew who does not want the world to forget the Holocaust.  He presents a scenario:

Suppose Obama succeeds in building friendships with Chavez, Castro, Ahmadinejad and the Taliban. What then? Does America still get to feel that it stands for something? Will we still be the beacon of liberty and freedom to the rest of the world, or will we have sold out in the name of political expediency? And do any of us seriously believe that presidential friendship is going to get a megalomaniac like Hugo Chavez to ease up on the levers of power, or are we just feeding his ego by showing him he can be a tyrant and still have a beer with the president of the United States? Will the Iranians really stop enriching uranium through diplomacy rather than economic sanctions?

And yet, oddly, the man prizes Obama’s “sunny optimism.”  That’s what it is?  Not lunacy?

Starting day with a few good items

Reading a book ain’t what it used to be.  Steven Johnson decides he has a yen for a novel, presses a few Kindle buttons, and has one in hand, presto.  That’s book-buying and reading these days.  He has more about the revolution in same here . . .

Chi mayoral brother and Cook County board member John Daley recuses himself often (votes present) on county board issues, so involved is he commercially with politically important insurance customers.  Mark Konkol and Tim Novak have that story of tangled webs here . . .

Banks aren’t lending as much as the Treasury Dept. says they are, because Treasury uses the median amount, but WSJ uses the totality of lending.  Another case, it seems of governmental body claiming success in business matters beyond what’s true.  A Journal team — David Enrich, Michael R. Crittenden and Maurice Tamman — has it here.

Roger and me about “State”

Roger Ebert and I have had our differences (none that he has known about), but this latest is major.  It’s how we feel about R. Crowe’s latest movie, now at Lake on Lake in Oak Park and many other places.  The movie, with an utterly forgettable name, “State of Play,”  taken from the BBC mini-series which it represents as feature film, is direct and to the point, without:

* sex, i.e. extended face-eating scenes and titillating nudity

* big-bosomed (I mean big) open-necked smart-ass females (rather, smart, small-bosomed, big-eyed, engaging but not cleaved at chest area)

* blood, including instant hole in forehead of bad or good guy plugged from near or far

* the word “fuck” and its derivatives

* time and screen space wasted on stuff that doesn’t spell out character or move ahead action, leading to periods of squirming in seat

* lingering by camera on every dot and blemish or blank-staring face of one or more DRAMATIC characters, leading to periods of squirming in seat.

And with:

* smart dialog, as Helen Mirren: “Don’t look at me like Bambi the cub reporter looking for a break” (or something like it: Mirren never better here, far better than the alcoholic moon face she adopts as that hyper-serious, hyper-conflicted detective inspector on British TV)

* characters credible enough to keep you wondering, not worrying (got my own worries, thank you) what will happen to them

* background sound that does not make you think this is a musical

* plot twists and turns that leave you (left me) trying to figure it out, not deprived but amused by the noodling.

Go see “State,” which is PG-13 and is an elegy in part (here Ebert and I coincide) to newspapers as we know them, but unfortunately gives homage to leftist conspiracy-thinking and Rupert Murdoch as unreliable, as in the bought bar girls’ testimony splashed on P-1 of the NY Post (briefly, but can’t be missed).

Why beef with Ebert (and the Chi Trib man)?  Because I loved the picture and he (they) merely liked it.  Reason enough!

Later: Another notable leftist tint was given by the ex-GI-gone-wild theme and major character: Rambo as nut case, a thoroughly unsympathetic villainous individual.

The bishop speaks

Bishop Thomas Paprocki slams Chi Trib today for “anti-Catholic bias,” accusing it of emulating 19th-century Know-Nothingness as embraced by the Trib of long, long ago. 

It’s a good letter that cites perpetrators — editorial writers, ex-Tribber and more to the point ex-Notre Dame VP-PR Don Wycliff, mayoral brother and Democrat party operative William Daley, and propagators of an April 5 front-page story about the mean old Catholic Church and its teaching against in vitro fertilization — with Catholic moralist acting as unwitting foil to sorrowing non-parents.

The Bill Daley letter of April 3, apart from its extremely sharp “Cardinal George’s stand is an embarrassment to Chicago Catholics,” was full of the utterly usual complaints, with not an original thought in it, and indeed the standard misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting of the issue as a matter of disagreement over doctrine, not public policy. 

And this from a largely behind-scenes performer who may run for governor and may not but almost never puts pen to paper for a paper.  He got the call, apparently, or at least the inspiration this time as a Catholic loyalist (to the party), to put it to Cardinal George as part of a full-court press to discredit him as opposing Obama at Notre Dame.

So Bishop P. was on target, but alas, engaged in overkill.  One does not have to recall Chi Trib nativism of the 1850s (sic) to take strong exception to what the Trib did this month — two op-eds, an editorial, and (unrelated to the ND business) a Front Pager heavily weighted against official Catholicism. 

The trick is to do some ju-jitsu on the newspaper, using its own weight to make it fall down, rather than to condemn it as hopeless for lo these 150 years.

And the kicker, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do”?  I’d save that for genocide or at least serial murder, especially when it comes on the heels of a condemnation for inveterate bias.

Palestinians drown out DePaul speaker

Nothing about this in Chi Trib or Sun-Times, says Google, but Chi Daily Observer has it, as do various Jewish publications.  No news here for Chi metros?

Campus Left Join Muslims to Bully Jewish Speaker at DePaul
Chicago Daily Observer – ?Apr 7, 2009?
On March 16 the DePaul chapter of Hillel hosted Jacob Shrybman of the Sderot Media Center. Led by Noam Bedein, the Sderot Media Center is the only media …

When Silence Isn’t Golden
St.Louis Jewishlight.com – ?Apr 3, 2009?
The problem hit close to home when a pro-Israel campus group recently cancelled the Saint Louis University appearance of Jacob Shrybman of the Sderot Media …
Education digest > 3/25

St. Louis Post-Dispatch – ?Mar 26, 2009?
Jacob Shrybman, from the Sderot Media Center, was to give a personal account of what it is like to live in one of these border towns and to talk about how …

Attacking Sderot From DePaul U.
Arutz Sheva – ?Apr 10, 2009?
by Jacob Shrybman Another audience member rose up in the front of the room and screamed out, calling me a “dirty whore” in Arabic. Science department. …

Shell-shocked in DePaul
Jerusalem Post – ?Apr 4, 2009?
By JACOB SHRYBMAN I wasn’t 30 hours off the plane from Israel to give a presentation at Chicago’s DePaul University on March 16, before I was greeted with …

By now it’s old news, but it wasn’t on March 17, the day after.  Big story here, came and went, but the ongoing situation is nicely described by Nicholas Hahn III a few days ago, also in the Observer:

Word came that Shrybman was going to display a rocket of the sort that have been shot into Israel.  It was something “DePaul’s Muslim community was not about to let . . . happen.”

An alliance of the Left on DePaul’s campus was formed and soon a letter of opposition to the rocket’s appearance on campus circulated faculty and administrative offices.  Signatories on this letter included the Students for Justice in Palestine, the United Muslims Moving Ahead, the DePaul Democrats [italics added] and almost laughably from “Students for the Advancement of Gender Awareness,” an organization whose status with the University is still unknown.

Maybe a feature story here for one of our metros?

First ounce, second ounce, on to Washington

Helpful item here on cost of first class mail, from Andrew K. Dart’s “The History of Postage Rates in the United States,” giving date of rate start, 1st ounce, each additional ounce, postcard:

May 12, 2008 42¢ 17¢ 27¢
May 11, 2009 44¢ 17¢ 28¢

So get your postcards mailed by 5/10 midnight, because a penny saved is a penny earned.  (Hat tip Ben Franklin)

And while you’re at it, get those ounces and pennies right for the coming Day of Replenishing the Big ATM on the Potomac, a.k.a U.S. Treasury, a.k.a. the Master Prestigitator (Now you see your money, now you don’t).

Happy mailing.

The (holy) week that is, and is, and is . . .

Hearing from a friend about a Holy Thursday service she found inspiring, I had to respond that my baptism is not taking well in recent years, as I have come to consider Holy Week as the Week of Overdoing It. 

Indeed, I showed up at our church door yesterday for the usual 8:30 a.m. mass (which I attend sporadically), to be reminded by a note on the door to bishops [sic] and other visiting liturgical performers saying where they should group for the night’s mass.  I had plumb forgot, so little have I been concerned about it. 

I labor to figure out why, who have been participating in Holy Week as long as I can remember, though less in recent years.  Part of it is age, I suppose, which militates against marathon services.  Part is a lingering discontent with our reformed liturgy — ah so bland, ah so darn functional, ah so explanatory

Part also is a lingering unfamiliarity that dates to my Jesuit days in the 50s and 60s, when “as confused as a Jesuit during Holy Week” was a going simile.  By the time I left, we were changing, it’s true.  A new day was dawning, and some of us, including me, were excited about it.

But then I left center stage, retreating to the pews, becoming a sort of back-bencher in things Catholic —  though welcomed as a highly qualified potential lay leader in the parish of my boyhood.  That potential lay fallow for these many decades, per my choice or series of choices.

Moreover, I wandered in and out of various churches, even Episcopal ones, though never for very long and usually doubling as loyal Roman.  In due time I have found what makes church attendance tick for me and, I think, many others, and that’s the peace and quiet of it all in the presence of praying others who tell me more about religion than most sermons.

Mark Twain called a game of golf “a good walk ruined,” my philosophy classmate Jack Britton, from Maryland Province, told me many years ago, mistakenly attributing it to Winston Churchill.  That’s how I often feel about church services that get too busy. 

To be frank, I’d rather sit and absorb the atmosphere of church, confronting my own demons all the while, than react to what’s going on up front, or most of it anyhow.  Church has a good thing going for it — the gathering of the faithful in a mood and environment of reverence and belief in the holy sacrifice — “throughout the world,” the old Morning Offering says.  This is a lot, and church people should be careful of not distracting from it by overdoing it.