Sullivan for mayor!

Former Oak Parker Sid Sullivan is running for mayor of Columbia MO.  He and his wife Joan, recently married, “established roots for the first time” in Oak Park in 1975.

Sullivan worked for the Circuit Court of Cook County for 12 years. He later joined the private sector in 1988 when he took a job with Roche Diagnostic Systems, a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical giant Hoffmann-La Roche, earning a master’s degree in business administration along the way.

Sid was preceded in politics by his wife.

In 1994 she ran for . . . county commission[er] . . . in Cook County . . .  She says she finished second in the race and came close to unseating the incumbent. In 1996 she ran for U.S. Congress in a crowded field that included Danny Davis, who won the election and still represents Illinois’ 7th District.

Sid’s platform reflects his Oak Park-ness.  He favors:

• Complete transparency in all city departments [which no man dare gainsay]
• Job opportunities for all [ditto, but where does the city come in?]
• An empowered and responsive city council [not now empowered?] 
• Adequate shelter for Columbia’s homeless residents [a la PADS?]
• Neighborhood planning that creates a sense of community [Oak Park!]
• Humane treatment for animals [local issue here?]

Columbia?  It’s

the fifth-largest city in the U.S. state of Missouri and the largest city in Mid-Missouri.[6] With an estimated population of 100,733 in 2008,[7] it is the principal municipality of the Columbia Metropolitan Area, a region of 164,283 residents.

vs. OP, with 50G or so, by the way.

One for all, all for . . . what?

Chi Trib has new policy: advertising on its front page.  You don’t believe me?  Look at today’s home delivery, with this joyous, camaraderie-filled big picture over the fold:

Obama Axelrod Emanuel 100319

Sorry, cannot find the glorious buddy shot on the web — different audiences, you know — and have to go with this.  The glorious one has these three plus two others unnamed in a 48–square-inch shot in which O. sits behind desk, rolled back from it, knee crossed, hand on chin, watching E. and A. joshing with each other, O. watching as a kindly uncle.  Good times at the White House!

The story is by by one Christi Parsons and Peter Nicholas, both of TribCo-owned LA Times, with its lede to die for:

President Obama was certain that he wanted to pass a healthcare bill. The question before his advisors was how to go about it.

Oh boy.  It’s called keeping it soft for the home folks.  And there was lots more to come, such as:

Axelrod and Emanuel are star players in almost every discussion. That might be expected given the common portrayals of the two. Emanuel is the hard-eyed, salty-tongued pragmatist who counts votes and navigates the polarized politics of Capitol Hill. Axelrod is more relaxed and avuncular, more inclined to invoke the aspirational language that Obama used in his campaign.

I love that “hard-eyed, salty-tongued” bit, “relaxed and avuncular” too.  And that “aspirational language,” oh!

You heard about all that rivalry and angst and O.’s being no longer happy with this job?  Or the ongoing ever-intenser struggle with recalcitrant Dems over Obamacare?  Look, that stuff doesn’t belong in a love letter.  Wash Post has it already anyhow.  Give the Chicagocrats something to warm their hearts with over coffee.  What’s a noosepaper for, anyhow?

One for all, all for . . . what?

Chi Trib has new policy: advertising on its front page.  You don’t believe me?  Look at today’s home delivery, with this joyous, camaraderie-filled big picture over the fold:

Obama Axelrod Emanuel 100319

Sorry, cannot find the glorious buddy shot on the web — different audiences, you know — and have to go with this.  The glorious one has these three plus two others unnamed in a 48–square-inch shot in which O. sits behind desk, rolled back from it, knee crossed, hand on chin, watching E. and A. joshing with each other, O. watching as a kindly uncle.  Good times at the White House!

The story is by by one Christi Parsons and Peter Nicholas, both of TribCo-owned LA Times, with its lede to die for:

President Obama was certain that he wanted to pass a healthcare bill. The question before his advisors was how to go about it.

Oh boy.  It’s called keeping it soft for the home folks.  And there was lots more to come, such as:

Axelrod and Emanuel are star players in almost every discussion. That might be expected given the common portrayals of the two. Emanuel is the hard-eyed, salty-tongued pragmatist who counts votes and navigates the polarized politics of Capitol Hill. Axelrod is more relaxed and avuncular, more inclined to invoke the aspirational language that Obama used in his campaign.

I love that “hard-eyed, salty-tongued” bit, “relaxed and avuncular” too.  And that “aspirational language,” oh!

You heard about all that rivalry and angst and O.’s being no longer happy with this job?  Or the ongoing ever-intenser struggle with recalcitrant Dems over Obamacare?  Look, that stuff doesn’t belong in a love letter.  Wash Post has it already anyhow.  Give the Chicagocrats something to warm their hearts with over coffee.  What’s a noosepaper for, anyhow?