“Personally.”

After listening to Cuba’s President Castro attack America over human rights, its trade embargo with Cuba, an “illegal occupation” of Guantanamo Bay, and “equal rights,” President Obama said “I personally would not disagree” with his criticisms.

“President Castro I think has pointed out that in his view making sure everybody’s getting a decent education or health care, has basic security in old age, that those things are human rights as well,” Obama said. “I personally would not disagree with that.”

“I actually welcome President Castro commenting on some of the areas where he feels we’re falling short because I think we should not be immune or afraid of criticism or discussion as well,” Obama added

Jerk.

Thinks he’s in a faculty lounge chatting with an obstreperous colleague.

Talks nicer to this guy than to Republicans.

Source: Obama: ‘I Personally Would Not Disagree’ with Castro’s Critique of America :: Grabien News

He’s as comfy as he can be.

Monday morning, Comfortably Smug tweeted this picture of President Obama standing in front of a mural of Che Guevara during his visit to Cuba.

My God. pic.twitter.com/rZYgnTi3dh— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) March 21, 2016

The picture appears to have been taken at Revolution Plaza, which President Obama was scheduled to visit.

Symbolic of sympathy and serious tendencies. Uncle Frank would love it.

Source: PIC: Obama Stands In Front of Che Mural in Cuba | The Weekly Standard

Big O having a ball:

“He often used the phrase ‘Yes we can – si se puede,” averred the opening act for the President of the United States upon his historic personal tour of Havana, Cuba.

“We can now say ‘Yes we did.’” If anyone had any residual doubt that the presidential visit to this island nation of recalcitrant communist holdouts was about anything other than Barack Obama, that little indulgence should dispel it.

Hey, what’s the point of being president anyhow?

Source: Obama’s Self-Affirmation in Cuba | commentary

The liar-in-chief now challenged:

When the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, President Obama vowed that he wouldn’t let it be used for federal funding of abortions.

That promise was necessary to get the law passed. Bart Stupak, a congressman at the time, and a small group of pro-life Democrats provided the necessary votes.

In regulations implementing the act, HHS has chosen a different, and more offensive, way to fund abortions: It makes Catholic and other religious employers pay for them.

Doesnt’t that get your gander up?

Source: ObamaCare vs. Little Sisters of the Poor – WSJ

Good question here:

Do environmentalists self-evidently command the higher moral ground? You might argue to the contrary that, although loving nature and protecting it are good things in themselves, environmentalists are guilty of writing prescriptions with no regard for the patient’s prior state of health.

Something for Pope Francis to consider?

Source: The Immorality of Environmentalism | City Journal