Phony baloney from professional Muslims.

As Trump’s inauguration approaches, the fake hate crime industry has kicked into high gear. A rash of widely reported “anti-Muslim hate crimes” have turned out to be hoaxes perpetrated by Muslims.

Hate crimes are political capital in our petulant, victimhood-idolizing society: when real incidents don’t exist, there is incentive to invent them. The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Muslims have on many occasions not hesitated to fabricate hate crimes, including attacks on mosques.

For CAIR and its allies, this is part of a larger agenda. They wish to deflect attention away from jihad terror attacks and plots, and to end law enforcement scrutiny of what is supposedly an unjustly despised and harassed group.

And they are regularly called out by major media? By whom?

Source: Robert Spencer in PJ Media: Five New Fake ‘Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes’

For a man cannot have publick spirit, who is void of private benevolence.

Source: Jubilate Agno, Fragment B, 3

Mrs. Conway vs. our most prominent social disease:

Kellyanne Conway has just upended another Washington convention. She did so when she agreed to speak at the annual March for Life, one week after Donald Trump is sworn in as president.

With this one gesture, Mrs. Conway steals some thunder from the celebrity-heavy Women’s March on Washington, scheduled for the day after Mr. Trump’s inauguration. She focuses attention on big changes ahead for abortion policy. She challenges the feminist trope that to be a woman is to be pro-choice.

Above all, she guarantees coverage of a march the press would prefer to ignore, and gets the New York Times to report that, having “made history” as “the first woman to manage a successful presidential campaign,” Mrs. Conway will now make history again as “the first sitting White House official to address the annual march in person.”

Well I never! What next?

Source: Kellyanne Conway and the Life of Her Party – WSJ

The report is based on nothing . . . 

The most important statement in the Justice Department’s damning report on the Chicago Police Department has nothing to do with police behavior.

Released on Friday, the report found the Chicago police guilty of a “pattern or practice” of unconstitutional force.

But it turns out that the Justice Department has no standard for what constitutes a “pattern or practice” (the phrase comes from a 1994 federal statute) of unconstitutional police conduct.

“Statistical evidence is not required” for a “pattern or practice” finding, the DOJ lawyers announce, citing unrelated court precedent.

Nor is there “a specific number of incidents” required to constitute a “pattern or practice,” they proclaim.

You might say the AG Lynch report is a DOJ lynching.

Read on: “Statistical Evidence Not Required” | City Journal