Congressman Adam Schiff (D.-Cal.): Before discussing immunity for Flynn,
“We should first acknowledge what a grave and momentous step it is for a former national security adviser to the president of the United States to ask for immunity from prosecution,” Mr. Schiff .
Which as stand-alone statement is indisputable. But context is everything here.
While they are at it, they should think also about the former Secretary of State being declared by the FBI director as "extremely careless" with national security information kept on computers in her basement. Congress had to swallow that, but this time it’s different?
Put another way, has such carelessness been the norm and we only recently heard about it? Or has the political climate done a very bad turn-around in the last, say, ten years?
Blithe Spirit 
I can’t answer your question, Jim, but what is important to me is that Adam Schiff seems to be the point man of the seditious conspiracy to topple a lawfully elected president.
LikeLike
Yes.
Jim Bowman
My Lulu page
My Amazon page
LikeLike
If memory serves, Schiff began peddling the cover story for the seditious conspiracy I have dubbed the Russia Game on November 9, Jim.
LikeLike
This I recall: He reacted testily to the Nunes business. He’s flacking for the party, amassing commentary on anti-Trump media.
My one small step for mankind here is to point out, very gently, the contradiction. If you have the Nov. 9 link, I’d like to know it.
LikeLike