How Trump has set economic growth on fire

I’ve been missing the big stories about this in newspapers and on the tube. Anybody else have this problem?

President Donald Trump is more than 19 months into an administration engulfed in so much controversy that it may overshadow a tremendous achievement, namely an economic boom uniquely his.

During his time in office, the economy has achieved feats most experts thought impossible. GDP is growing at a 3 percent-plus rate. The unemployment rate is near a 50-year low. Meanwhile, the stock market has jumped 27 percent amid a surge in corporate profits.

Friday brought another round of good news: Nonfarm payrolls rose by a better-than-expected 201,000 and wages, the last missing piece of the economic recovery, increased by 2.9 percent year over year to the highest level since April 2009. That made it the best gain since the recession ended in June 2009.

His critics, a group that includes a legion of Wall Street economists, most Democrats and even some in his own Republican Party, don’t believe it will last. They figure the current boom will begin petering out as soon as mid-2019 and possibly end in recession in 2020. [Italics mine throughout]

Ah yes. Consummation devoutly to be wished, by whom you can surely guess.

For them there’s a cloud for every silver lining. Oh for the Obama-trademark new normal.

Those were the days, my friend. We thought they’d never end. And then came the evil Donald Trump. Go figure.

via CNBC

Sun-Times up and at ’em with excellent coverage of Catholic abuse story

Sun-Times’ excellent coverage here:

Pope ‘won’t say a word about it’ after he’s accused of ignoring abuse claims

As sex-abuse crisis roils the Catholic Church, Cupich goes on seminary retreat

Cardinal Cupich orders priests to address disputed TV report at Mass

In Ireland, Pope Francis apologizes for ‘crimes’ Catholic Church committed there

In wake of sex abuse crisis, archbishop asks Pope to cancel youth conference

via Catholic Church lay board that probed sex abuse 15 years ago seeks reappointment

Catholic Church lay board that probed sex abuse 15 years ago seeks reappointment

Illinois supreme court chief justice Anne Burke wrote a letter to the U.S. bishops’ president that shows she is not kidding.

List of those willing to serve once again is nothing to sneeze at. Only the pope can call such group. Here’s the rub. Francis wants lay people to say nothing at this point. Why would he hand such an investigation over to non-vetted lay people? Would be out of character for him.

via Catholic Church lay board that probed sex abuse 15 years ago seeks reappointment

Church needs independent lay panel to probe latest allegations

A modest proposal:

Just last week, we argued that the stakes are too high for the credibility of the Catholic Church to ignore accusations of misconduct or poor judgment made against the pope and various bishops by a high-ranking church diplomat.

We said there should be an independent investigation.

Now Illinois Supreme Court Justice Anne Burke has proposed an excellent way to do just that.

Burke’s proposal — to reappoint a lay board created 15 years ago by the U.S. Conference of Bishops to investigate sex abuses by priests and authorize it now to investigate top U.S. church leaders — makes sense. Burke sat on the original lay board, and she and her colleagues are willing to be called back into service and report their findings directly to Pope Francis.

This time it may work, but no one should hold his or her breath.

via Sun-Times editorial

Bishop Eleganti: “The Pope’s silence is a classic non-denial!”

Interviewer (Kath.net) to auxiliary bishop of Chur, Switzerland after close of World Meeting of Families in Dublin: 

Interviewer, August 30, 2018). “The attempts to rewrite the traditional doctrine that regards homosexual acts as disordered in themselves, and therefore forbids them, are conspicuous. Pope Francis is surrounded by cardinals and advisors who are headed in this direction.”

So says the Auxiliary Bishop of Chur and former Jugendbischof of the (Catholic) Episcopal Conference of Switzerland [i.e. the bishop delegated to oversee programs for the pastoral care of young people] in this interview with kath.net.

Kath.net: The World Meeting of Families in Dublin was completely overshadowed by the topic of sexual abuse, and not just because of the revelations by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former Nuncio in Washington, D.C. Well, the Pope himself would like to say nothing about the accusations. What do you say about this?

Bishop [Marian] Eleganti, [O.S.B.]: The fact that Pope Francis does not want to say a single word about them is a classic non-denial. Lying, of course, is completely out of the question.

Speaks softly, carrying big stick of getting to the point.

More here at Catholic World Report

Woodward book puts White House back in damage-control mode

Swamp spokesman here.

Expected him before this. Poll on his credibility, anyone? But they do make splash for a while.

Throw mud or drag out and put between covers what main streamers have been pushing for months, some sticks.

Catnip for Beltway, as Fox hostess Dana Perino said.

It’s Drudge’s main headline for the nonce. (In fact, I just looked, and it’s been demoted.)

All will pass.

 

A penetrating question about Pope Francis and ex-Cardinal McCarrick

First of all, apart from the Vigano accusations, if Francis did not know about the deposed cardinal, why didn’t he?

He’s the chief executive of a major international organization; and one of its most prominent operatives, of international renown, has been demoted to private-citizen status, sent apparently to a monastery.

Busting a cardinal is a very big deal. Francis was apparently shocked and amazed when he found out about it. When was that?

The guy had presumably been vetted, was considered trustworthy and loyal to Francis. What went wrong? 

Asked about it, he administers a stunning no-comment and recommends silence for all concerned in one of the most stunning I’m-above-all-that performances since what a prominent Middle Eastern governor pulled off some 20 centuries ago. 

Is Francis trying to make Hollywood executives in the Weinstein case look like shouters-from-housetops by comparison? 

Francis, won’t you please either come clean or disprove the nay-sayers, to put our hearts at ease? Please?