Agency ran anonymous-source story, quoting source at length in great detail, identifying him as one of a dozen or so who attended a closed-door meeting, apparently never asking or even wondering about the other eleven, in any case not naming or referring to them.
Lesson: Do not go anonymous when the other guy can check it out, even if the other guy and you agree in no major issues and had to wonder how such a good thing could fall in his (their) lap.
Question: Has the Agency learned that?
Blithe Spirit 