Fr. Paul Kalchik has heard nothing from the archdiocese since he was “verbally threatened” by the two vicars for priests in a telephone call.
This in a rather sympathetic Chicago Tribune interview.
Fr. Paul Kalchik has heard nothing from the archdiocese since he was “verbally threatened” by the two vicars for priests in a telephone call.
This in a rather sympathetic Chicago Tribune interview.
- Approval of the establishment of a third-party reporting system that will receive confidentially, by phone and online, complaints of sexual abuse of minors by a bishop and sexual harassment of or sexual misconduct with adults by a bishop and will direct those complaints to the appropriate ecclesiastical authority and, as required by applicable law, to civil authorities.
- Instructions to the USCCB Committee on Canonical Affairs and Church Governance to develop proposals for policies addressing restrictions on bishops who were removed or resigned because of allegations of sexual abuse of minors or sexual harassment of or misconduct with adults, including seminarians and priests.
- Initiation of the process of developing a Code of Conduct for bishops regarding the sexual abuse of a minor; sexual harassment of or sexual misconduct with an adult; or negligence in the exercise of his office related to such cases.
- Support for a full investigation into the situation surrounding Archbishop McCarrick, including his alleged assaults on minors, priests, and seminarians, as well any responses made to those allegations. Such an investigation should rely upon lay experts in relevant fields, such as law enforcement and social services.
“Only a beginning,” they say. Consultation with laity, a “sine qua non” of investigation, will be part of it all. Nothing new there, in terms of promised strategy. But the bishops also acknowledge “a general corrosion of moral culture within the ranks of the Church’s clerical and hierarchical leadership,” which is clear enough to the public but still a lot to swallow by the leadership:
“Some bishops . . . have caused great harm to both individuals and the Church as a whole,” the Administrative Committee writes at the top of their statement. “They have used their authority and power to manipulate and sexually abuse others,” they continue. “They have allowed the fear of scandal to replace genuine concern and care for those who have been victimized by abusers.”
So forthright an admission of widespread failure and miscarriage of duty has been a long time coming. It is welcome, even though it does not satisfy.
It’s a start, says Catholic World Report.
It belongs to the faithful to hold [the bishops] to the promises they have made, and to demand a responsible part in even stronger measures — ones really apt, as the Administrative Committee says, “to repair the scandal and restore justice.” Whether this is a real beginning of that long and arduous work, or merely more empty words, remains to be seen.
To be sure.
So they are striking out with an ambitious program of their own.
- the establishment of a third-party reporting system that would receive confidential complaints about sexual misconduct by bishops, and report those complaints to ecclesiastical and/or civil authorities, as appropriate;
- a project to develop proposals for canonical restrictions on bishops who resign because of complaints involving sexual misconduct;
- another project to develop a code of conduct for bishops regarding sexual misconduct and negligence in responding to complaints; and
- support for a full investigation, supported by lay experts in law enforcement and social services, into the charges lodged against former cardinal Theodore McCarrick and the responses to those charges.
They aim to put teeth in it.
Pope’s refusal (or ignoring their request) foreclosed something else with even more teeth, Vatican clout in the matter.
Such an investigation, backed by papal authority, could require bishops’ cooperation and the release of relevant Vatican documents, and would therefore greatly increase the likelihood that the charges made by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano would be either proven or disproven conclusively.
Ideal opportunity for the pope to defend against what he apparently considers a calumny, though he has never out-and-out denied Vigano’s allegations.
The bishops say these steps are “only a beginning.” Their statement
calls upon all bishops to make a “deep examination of conscience,” and to join in prayer and penance. “We cannot content ourselves that our response to sexual assault within the Church has been sufficient,” the bishops say.
There’s hope in this. They are promising something that would be very good.
Auxiliary Bishop Morneau of Green Bay will withdraw from public ministry, devoting himself to “prayer for all victims and survivors of sexual abuse and . . . corporal works of mercy in reparation for what I failed to do.”
A model for others. one would think.
Easy peasey, girl. We all make mistakes.
A former classmate of Christine Blasey Ford tells NPR that she does not know if an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh took place as she first suggested on social media.
“That it happened or not, I have no idea,” Cristina King Miranda told NPR’s Nina Totenberg. “I can’t say that it did or didn’t.”
That’s different from what Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Facebook post that stated definitively, “The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school.”
In other words, she got caught up in the moment. A resister who did not think twice.
It’s like the old laugh line: Next time, THIMK!
via NPR
Ringing defense by one who was there, closing with:
Is Goedert an unsung hero? That is hard to say. But he did not flee the arena. He stayed and did what he could. If that falls short of your latter-day moral standard, he will have to live with that.
But the public record should be fair. Rev. Raymond Goedert was a major player in a quiet effort that substantially cleaned up the Archdiocese of Chicago before the public was even aware of the problem. That should be his legacy, not an editorial calculated to humiliate him and, so meanly, to roust an elderly priest out of the cardinal’s house.
Long and detailed account.
“I’m calling on Pope Francis and Cardinal Cupich to send this hateful bigot packing,” [Ald.] Mell wrote [on her Facebook page]. “If the church is serious about restoring trust with its parishioners and spreading a message of love and tolerance, this is a perfect opportunity. This is a hate crime — plain and simple. I’m asking the City and Federal government to treat it as one.”
Won’t happen, however, according to
Julie Justicz, director of the hate crimes project at the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights.
“While we advocate strongly against hate crimes, I have a hard time calling this a hate crime,” Justicz said. “There isn’t an underlying crime that would make it a hate crime under Illinois law.”
Under state law, she said, a crime like battery or assault would have to accompany biased motivation or discriminatory intent.
Nobody got punched out. So maybe the alderman might want to cool down.
But she sure wants the priest’s head. A regular Salome, she is.
via Chicago Tribune
Gay-acceptance advocate James Martin SJ says he “cannot imagine a more homophobic act, short of beating up an LGBT person . . . What the pastor and some of his parishioners did shows the kind of hatred that LGBT Catholics still face — in their own church.”
The pressure is on.
via Sun-Times
The Great West Virginia President Firing
Deserved an article in Gent’s Quarterly or Vogue.
1. He had a personal chef whom he sent to France for two weeks to learn how to prepare gourmet food as the French prepare it. The chef enjoyed his time there and said he was amazed at how the French care for their vegetables
2. He had a sunken bar installed in his mansion on Elmwood Place, Wheeling, along with a huge wine cellar (be assured there was neither Boone’s Farm nor Mad Dog 20/20 on his shelves)
3. He took NUMEROUS first-class fights to Rome each year, always accompanied and always carrying a significant amount of dollars converted to euros
4. On one occasion while dining at the Chop House restaurant in Charleston he told an associate he had considered buying a helicopter for the diocese but ruled that purchase out because, “that would send the people over the deep…
View original post 29 more words