The case against Dr. Fauci . . .

. . . as made yesterday by Peter Navarro, an assistant to the president, director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy.

Dr. Anthony Fauci has a good bedside manner with the public, but he has been wrong about everything I have interacted with him on.

In late January, when I was making the case on behalf of the president to take down the flights from China, Fauci fought against the president’s courageous decision — which might well have saved hundreds of thousands of American lives.

When I warned in late January in a memo of a possibly deadly pandemic, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was telling the news media not to worry.

When I was working feverishly on behalf of the president in February to help engineer the fastest industrial mobilization of the health care sector in our history, Fauci was still telling the public the China virus was low risk.

When we were building new mask capacity in record time, Fauci was flip-flopping on the use of masks.

And when Fauci was telling the White House Coronavirus Task Force that there was only anecdotal evidence in support of hydroxychloroquine to fight the virus, I confronted him with scientific studies providing evidence of safety and efficacy. A recent Detroit hospital study showed a 50% reduction in the mortality rate when the medicine is used in early treatment.

Now Fauci says a falling mortality rate doesn’t matter when it is the single most important statistic to help guide the pace of our economic reopening. The lower the mortality rate, the faster and more we can open.

After looking around the web for comments etc. more than I intended to, I (a) commend Navarro for putting these accusations out there, (b) concede the nuances involved while still suspicious on my own about a 36-year veteran of the Washington morass who is obviously well practiced at minding his p’s and q’s diplomatically and politically, and (c) (always make it a-b-c, all beyond that has reader giving up) I did find this below appearing at end of an extended USA Today interview last February, when Dr. F. was asked:

Q. We see everyone walking around in masks. Do they work?

A. A mask is much more appropriate for someone who is infected and you’re trying to prevent them from infecting other people than it is in protecting you against infection. If you look at the masks that you buy in a drug store, the leakage around that doesn’t really do much to protect you. And for example, people start saying, should I start wearing a mask? Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.

What a difference five months make.

I’m gonna copy that to the lady at church who has several times bugged me about my non-wearing of the mask while praying at daily Mass, after I’d worn it as the sine qua non of being allowed past the angels guarding the door.

Second thought, I won’t do that, saving it as a last resort to combat her misguided zeal.

Microsoft Edge trending: “Trump stirs controversy with latest race remarks” — Wow. What did he sayyyy???

MS=Microsoft, as in MSNBC=leftward ho . . .

Chicago Newspapers

Are you ready to be shocked (shocked!) out of your minds????

President Trump offered inflammatory comments on race in two separate interviews Tuesday, including responding to a question about police killings of Black people by saying police also kill white people.

How can he say such an inflammatory thing, which is up there with “So’s your old man” and other inflammatory comments over the centuries?

Does this mean he’s criticizing THE most socially aware, the most woke movement in modern history, BLACK LIES MATTER?

Woe.

via Microsoft Edge

View original post

Bari Weiss Resigns From the Times, ‘A Distant Galaxy’ Far From America . . . 

Publisher said he was on her side, privately . . .

Writers & Writing

. . . whose model is Twitter:

Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor. As the ethics and mores of that platform have become those of the paper, the paper itself has increasingly become a kind of performance space. Stories are chosen and told in a way to satisfy the narrowest of audiences, rather than to allow a curious public to read about the world and then draw their own conclusions. I was always taught that journalists were charged with writing the first rough draft of history. Now, history itself is one more ephemeral thing molded to fit the needs of a predetermined narrative.

More more in this letter that belongs in the history books.

View original post

Newsom orders closure of indoor activities across California as coronavirus cases increase

Power!

Chicago Newspapers

Having the time of his life, he is.

Newsom, a Democrat, announced during a press briefing that all bars across the state must close up shop and that restaurants, wineries, tasting rooms, family entertainment centers, zoos, museums and card rooms must suspend indoor activities.

The governor also announced that all gyms, places of worship, malls, personal care services, barbershops, salons, and non-critical offices in counties on the state’s “monitoring list” had to shut down under the new order. The order affects more than 30 counties which are home to about 80 percent of California’s population.

Have a nice day, Golden Staters.

s

View original post

Thomas Sowell to Mark Levin: concept of systemic racism ‘has no meaning’

Who needs meaning anyhow?

Chicago Newspapers

That catchphrase for purposes of steaming up the narrative and bamboozling the country.

It has the sound, you know. If you need it explained, you are part of the problem.

Economist and author Thomas Sowell told “Life Liberty & Levin” in an interview airing Sunday evening that the left’s claim that America is beset by “systemic racism” has no definitive meaning and cannot be “tested” in any empirical manner.

“You hear this phrase, ‘systemic racism’ [or] ‘systemic oppression’,” host Mark Levin told Sowell. “You hear it on our college campuses. You hear it from very wealthy and fabulously famous sports stars. What does that mean? And whatever it means, is it true?”

“It really has no meaning that can be specified and tested in the way that one tests hypotheses,” answered Sowell, who added that the currency of the phrase reminds him of the “propaganda tactics” of Nazi Germany…

View original post 176 more words

I’m a black doctor. I wear my scrubs everywhere now.

You gotta feel for this guy. 

As a urology resident, I spend up to 70 hours a week at the hospital. I wear scrubs to the operating room and through long hospital shifts. And, of course, I wear a gown and other personal protective equipment over my scrubs when caring for patients with covid-19 in Brooklyn.

Even when I’m not there, though, I wear my medical scrubs everywhere. I wear scrubs and a mask when I’m shopping at the grocery store, rollerblading home from work and even meeting up with friends, always seeking to preemptively exonerate my blackness with my professional garb.

It’s about protecting myself. Like many black Americans, I’ve been followed by security personnel through department stores without cause and pulled over by police officers at night for no reason.

Why is that? Could it be the high crime rates in black neighborhoods? He bears the mark of Cain through no fault of his own, and it understandably bothers him. But it seems there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

via HotAir