Category Archives: Blithe Spirit

The good and the bad, emphasis on Trib and Sun-Times

Pope’s cardinal in S. Africa lays an egg on Twitter

Lays into EWTN, Arroyo and company, likens A’s ‘casts to (wow!) N. Ireland’s Ian Paisley’s in the ’60s and ’70s.

Bad, bad, say EWTN fans.

Mueller report. Consider the source while reading it.

Advice from Lawyer Dershowitz:

Special counsel Robert Mueller is likely to wrap up his investigation soon and issue a confidential report to the attorney general. It is important to understand the legal status of such a report and how it should be released and evaluated under the Justice Department regulations governing special counsels.

First and foremost, because it is the report of a prosecutor, it will inevitably be one-sided. [Emphasis added]

Read the rest. I will.

Tale of several popes. Unfolding drama unfolds further . . .

Before Pius X was Pius V and the Tridentine (Trent) mass . . .

Dominus Vobiscum: Novus Ordo (re)considered

Continuing book in progress, working title “Dominus Vobiscum” . . .

The first modern-day papal liturgical reformer, Pius X, 1903 to 1914, is claimed by later reformers as one of their own. But it’s truly an afterthought for them because his ideas and theirs were worlds apart. Or drifted that way, as we shall see.

Indeed, this Pius was more in the mold of Pius V (1566-1572), who wound down a council, of Trent, or Tridentum, 1545-1563, and followed through on its edicts and findings with the mass called Tridentine.

This 5th Pius curiously has this in common with his successor-reformer of four centuries later, Paul VI, who followed through on a council he also had not convened with a new mass, “Novus Ordo,” with radically new script and stage directions.

The two masses endure, the first as barely tolerated (by never-Tridentiners among higher clergy and arguably the pope) or…

View original post 114 more words

Peace in Korea?

Signs are clear.

Once-Chicago bishop a star

Second only to the top Catholic star, Pope Francis.

He might not look it, but Bishop Robert Barron is a social-media superstar. Sporting thick-framed glasses and a folksy Midwestern demeanor, the Catholic auxiliary bishop of Los Angeles resembles the comedian Drew Carey, only trimmer. But the aw-shucks routine isn’t fooling anyone. Beneath it lies a penetrating intellect and clear talent for using popular culture to draw people into—or back to—Catholicism.

With his popular online film reviews, political commentary and plain-English homilies, the 59-year old bishop has struck a nerve. He has 1.6 million Facebook fans and 130,000 Twitter followers. His YouTube videos have been viewed 34 million times, while his channel has some 165,000 subscribers. If there’s a growth stock in the bishop’s portfolio, it’s Instagram, where he’s gained a mere 91,000 fans. Only Pope Francis is more popular with English-speaking Catholics.

I bet Archbishop Cupich wishes he had him back. Kidding.

The bishop who knew too much

Celebrated in National Catholic Register:

The death of Bishop Robert Morlino will be noted far beyond the Diocese of Madison, Wisconsin. The late prelate’s outspoken orthodoxy and support for traditional liturgy will ensure that. Yet his life is of interest beyond his diocese and his admirers. It tracked in an unusual way the ecclesial shifts of his time.

Robert Morlino was born on New Year’s Eve 1946 into the solidly Catholic culture of Scranton, Pennsylvania. He would attend the Jesuits’ Scranton Preparatory high school, belonging to the last generation where it was wholly unremarkable that some of the graduates would enter the Society of Jesus. Morlino did, studying at Fordham and Notre Dame and in Weston, Massachusetts — a typical formation for thousands of Jesuits in the United States.

He was ordained in 1974 and experienced as a young priest the upheaval in the Society of Jesus, as theological confusion, disciplinary breakdown, widespread homosexuality and a culture of dissent sent Jesuits heading for the exits in droves. [Emphasis added]

Most left to embrace a liberalizing world outside the order; fewer sought refuge in the diocesan priesthood, where they could live their priesthood unmolested by the deep dysfunction of Jesuit leadership in the 1970s. Father Morlino was one of the latter, incardinating in the Diocese of Kalamazoo, Michigan, in 1981. [Ditto]

After seven years with the wrong organization, apparently.

Just popped out at me from a Vatican release 4 days ago about limiting to abuse discussion to protecting minors, nothing about seminarians . . .

. . . or offending bishops.

In a statement Nov. 23, Papal spokesman Greg Burke called the February meeting “unprecedented,” and said that it “shows Pope Francis has made the protection of minors a fundamental priority for the Church.”

The gathering is about “keeping children safe from harm worldwide,” he said, adding that the pope wants the Church’s leaders to “to have a full understanding of the devastating impact that clerical sexual abuse has on victims.”

As for bishops, a two-edged sword.

Burke said that the meeting is for bishops, who, he said, have the most responsibility for the “grave problem” of abuse; but lay men and women who are experts in the area of abuse will also be providing input and will be able to help address what should be done “to ensure transparency and accountability.”

Beautiful, much used phrase at the end.

As for responsibility, if that is so, why was initiative by Americans squelched and its leadership blind-sided at the recent fiasco-ized bishops’ meeting in Baltimore?

Holy b.s., I say.

The choosing of bishops, through a glass very darkly . . .

The uber-interesting, one might say puckish, Fr. Hunwicke digs up some very interesting commentary about this mysterious process in the light of the current papal incumbency:

Today, I would like simply to point out that, more than a year before Cardinal Mueller’s disturbing recent words about the sort of questionable individuals, theological illiterates signed up to Bergoglianism, who are being appointed to senior positions in the hierarchy; and before His Excellency Archbishop Vigano’s revelations about the same subject, Fr Aidan had spoken with great clarity. His antennae must be very sensitive!

“[The pope’s] programme would not have got as far as it has were it not the case that theological liberals, generally of the closet variety, have in the fairly recent past been appointed to high positions both in the world episcopate and in the ranks of the Roman Curia.”

“Of the closet variety” is an entertainingly old-fashioned phrase!

It was a few months before Dr Nichols’ lecture that, on 19 November 2016, Cupich and Tobin were made cardinals.

The testimony this year of Archbishop Vigano asserted that the appointments of Cupich to Chicago (November 18 2014) and of Tobin to Newark (November 7 2016) “were orchestrated by McCarrick, Maradiaga, and Wuerl … their names were not among those presented by the Nunciature for Chicago and Newark”.

It would be a good thing if, henceforth, the terna of names submitted by Nuncios to the Holy See for a vacant bishopric were to be published. 

God’s people should not have to wait for a Vigano (God bless him) to come along before they can know what is being proposed for their own Particular Church. They should not be deprived of the liberty to form their own minds both about the proposed three names, and … if this occurs … why all three have been set aside so that the job can be given to another.

They should be treated as Grown Ups. 

This is what, in the Anglo-Saxon cultural world, is often known as ACCOUNTABILITY.

Women and children first, push ’em up front where the gas is heaviest

Tried and true organizing ploy.

Forty-two caravan migrants broke into the United and were arrested on Sunday, while organizers pushed women and children to the front of the melee, a top border patrol agent told CNN.

I heard about this in the Roosevelt Road riots in the summer of ’66, told by eyewitness friends in the black community. The smart boys heaved rocks over the heads of teen-agers and younger children in rows facing the police.

Cupich one of power quartet to organize anti-abuse meeting in February — fox and chickencoop situation?

Cardinal C of Chi is one you would ordinarily pick for this uber-important job?

ROME, November 23, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has named Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago to a four-member organizing committee for next February’s Vatican summit on clerical sexual abuse.

The appointment is raising concerns because Cardinal Cupich has notably dismissed Archbishop Viganò’s testimony on the McCarrick abuse cover-up as a mere “rabbit hole” distracting the Church, believes that homosexuality is not a significant contributing factor in the abuse of minors (despite statistics showing otherwise), and has defended the Vatican postponing U.S. bishops from voting on measures to prevent abuse cover-up.

Well, as for the last, wouldn’t he prefer leaving it to the big show, where he’s to be a big shot, as opposed to doing something in Baltimore, for the group that voted him down as prexy last time around?

He got their vote of no-confidence months ago. Why should he build them up now?

As for the chickencoop part, he’s been a wild man in Chi about certain conservative leaders but has no history of particular expertise or leadership in the dreadful clergy-abuse situation.

%d bloggers like this: