Chicago’s Uptown neighborhood 40 years ago: recollections of a canvasser

Rick Rozoff remembers:

To return in imagination to the Uptown neighborhood of forty years ago entails not only visiting another year, decade and century but exploring another era. In the late 1970s and early 1980s much of Uptown was the magnet for what could be deemed internal migration: it was home to several hundreds if not thousands of Appalachians from Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia and Tennessee and Native American Indians, largely Ojibwa, from Wisconsin and Minnesota. There was even an obscure and intriguing colony of African-Americans who were descendants of people who had left Jim Crow Tennessee in the early 1900s.

At the same time Uptown was beginning to assume the nature of what could be described as the Ellis Island of the airplane age. Immigrants began arriving from Southeast Asia, primarily from Vietnam, from the Middle East, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe.

Entire courtyard apartment buildings housed Assyrians from Iraq and, simultaneously or in succession, Cambodians, Bosnians of Muslim background and Jews from the Soviet Union. Ethnic restaurants and grocery stores in the quadrant — roughly formed by Irving Park to the South, Foster to the north, Clark to the west and Lake Michigan to the east — could be counted in the dozens, representing as many nations. Visiting most of them was like entering the family kitchen and dining room of a family of Lebanese, Colombians, Somalis, Greeks, Iranians, Swedes, or Nigerians.

The word diversity is often employed to describe neighborhoods far less varied and colorful than Uptown was at the time. Conducting voter registration and canvassing work throughout the area for several years in the 1980s, I never knew what fascinating ethnographic and cultural encounter awaited me when I rang the next doorbell. One person I met right around the corner from my own apartment was Khachatur Khachaturyan (“My name is KhachaTUR KhachaturYAN!”) He had been born in Jerusalem when it was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire. Working for decades on the night shift in a box factory in the suburbs, he had never had the opportunity to register to vote. When I completed the form for doing so in his presence, for him it was almost the equivalent of becoming a citizen again. Although an ethnic Armenian, he was proud to lend me cassettes of music by Umm Kulthum and other Arabic-language singers.

Memory revives images like the above in the manner of a kaleidoscope. Hues and shades and shapes merge into each other, gently blending into a mythical world that none but its residents knew, and that now exists only in the mind’s eye. And in the heart.

Youth: a tale of the ’40s told by an 11-year-old, signifying nothing . . .

Part One, Derring-do in the twilight.

From the pages of BLITHE SPIRIT, A Weekly Commentary, May 8, 1996, Two Cents and worth it.
================
We had a grand time dumping ash cans. It was Friday night. We crawled
up and tied twine to cans on third floors of apartment buildings, then tiptoed
down taking the twine with us. Then we took the twine out behind the garage
in the alley and pulled it. Down would come garbage can with a mighty clang-
or.

With luck the yard was paved. Some are like that, more areaway than
yard. When the can hits the pavement, the noise is tremendous. We take off
down the alley. What a blast!

It went like that all night. Bill and Charley and Mel and I, plus
others. . . . .

For the rest go here . . .

New task for the Holy Spirit, per Synod of Bishops: Question the doctrine

All these years we thought we knew. Now comes the revolution and with it a great awakening.

The General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops issued the Working Document (WD) for the Continental Stage of the Synod for a Synodal Church last week. It unapologetically calls into question various Catholic doctrines under the guise of listening to the Holy Spirit who, remarkably, is somehow speaking through the complaints and criticisms of those who reject what the Church teaches and has always taught.

And of course, with every new thing comes the rationale.

Contributions from around the world that contradict Catholic doctrine are cited or summarized with approval because “they express in a particularly powerful, beautiful or precise way sentiments expressed more generally in many reports.” (¶6) Those sentiments enjoy the presumption of Spirit-inspired truth while doctrines cause alienation and sorrow.

Lord, deliver us from doctrine. What we want is an end to sorrow right now. Heaven on earth.

Remarks from an American parish group are emblematic: “The vision of a Church capable of radical inclusion, shared belonging, and deep hospitality according to the teachings of Jesus is at the heart of the synodal process: ‘Instead of behaving like gatekeepers trying to exclude others from the table, we need to do more to make sure that people know that everyone can find a place and a home here.’” (¶31) The WD further explains that “[t]he synodal experience can be read as a path of recognition for those who do not feel sufficiently recognized in the Church.” (¶32)

The devil’s in those details?

So who feels excluded? “Among those who ask for a more meaningful dialogue and a more welcoming space we also find those who, for various reasons, feel a tension between belonging to the Church and their own loving relationships, such as: remarried divorcees, single parents, people living in a polygamous marriage, LGBTQ people, etc.” (¶39) This even gets a second mention:  “Many summaries also give voice to the pain of not being able to access the Sacraments experienced by remarried divorcees and those who have entered into polygamous marriages. There is no unanimity on how to deal with these situations” (¶94)

It’s been on its way for decades, love, love, hooray for love in sermonic pablum, week in, week out, Catholicism Lite. The old ’60s cry, heard from the picketers: What do we want? Freedom. When do we want it? Now.

Who else is complaining? “After careful listening, many reports ask that the Church continue its discernment in relation to a range of specific questions: the active role of women in the governing structures of Church bodies, the possibility for women with adequate training to preach in parish settings, and a female diaconate. Much greater diversity of opinion was expressed on the subject of priestly ordination for women, which some reports call for, while others consider a closed issue.” (¶64)

Gimme that old-time discernment, our all-purpose justifying thing.

The solution? “[The] conversion of the Church’s culture, for the salvation of the world, is linked in concrete terms to the possibility of establishing a new culture, with new practices and structures.” (¶60)

more more more here, as Fr. Murray of New York tells us, God bless that man . . .

Skies are cloudy and gray? Only gray for a day . . .

Wrap your troubles in the awareness of God . . .

Were the Society of Jesus to be dissolved, Ignatius once conjectured, it would take him 15 minutes of prayer to reconcile himself. Francis de Sales was once asked how long he went without being aware of the presence of God; his response, too, was 15 minutes.

For both masters, abandonment and holy indifference capture how they lived their lives and instructed those who follow them. To put it bluntly, each will spot us 15 minutes to get refocused on letting God lead us and not vice versa.

. . . and dream your troubles away? Not exactly. Something better here? You don’t know until you try it.

Pope Francis again castigates fellow Catholics

He has a way with words. Whence comes such another?

#PopeFrancis at Mass to mark 60 years since opening of Vatican II says that progressivism and “traditionalism — or backwardness — aren’t evidence of love, but of infidelity” and “Pelagian egoisms which put our own tastes and plans above the love that pleases God.”

As chief shepherd of millions, he owes us an explanation. For instance, what are Pelagian egoisms? Try what duckduckgo (a google alternative) comes up with and see where you fit in. You might learn something.

It’s heretical, that much is for sure, and while denying original sin, is clearly something that puts the blame not only on Mame but on all of us. Born free of evil tendencies, we can make it on own after all and if we don’t, then . . . You get it.

In any case, the shepherd of us all . . . what? As I say, he should explain.