Straight language on Sunday morning

16th after Pentecost at my old-style mass today.  It led Father G. to talk about being humble unto death by crucifixion, as Jesus was: “Everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.”


G. delivers without humor or self-deprecation or self-building or irony or handly allusions to the day’s headlines or accepted practices.  It’s straight homiletics, unadorned and not too long and fitting for the solemnity of the occasion.


He goes into tradition, even to questionable stuff such as St. Helen, mother of Emperor Constantine, finding the true cross in the 4th century.  So what if questionable?  It’s not a history lesson but a homily.  You repeat myths for their inspirational value.


In any case, it beats the pedestrian nonsense you hear in most mainstream RC pulpits, delivered too often in cutespeak by holy salesmen.  That’s my church-related thought for the day.

Tags:

Capturing the man

This is lovely about the putative future first husband, Bill, here contrasted with his wife the candidate:  Bill

is an oleaginous people pleaser, a cross between Franklin Roosevelt and the guy looking for a free drink at the end of the bar.

Jonah Goldberg could have stopped right there.  We would have known what he meant.  However, for people not like us, he added:

If he sidles up to someone who loves Tito Puente, he’ll be quick to say, “Oh, I’ve been listening to him for years!” If he meets someone who hates Tito Puente, he’ll shed a single tear and bite his lip that he just couldn’t get Puente’s albums banned, because of that awful Republican-controlled Congress. And sometimes he’ll please both parties simultaneously. To paraphrase Yogi Berra, when Bill comes to a fork in the road, he takes it. But in his eagerness, you can sometimes catch the duplicity.

I give him an A-minus, which is not bad from a former Jesuit English teacher.

This Jesuit is good

Oh my.  Just caught the Jesuit Father James Martin on with Stephen Colbert discussing Mother Teresa’s dark night of the soul, and Martin is good!  Perfect, I’d say. 

“Dark night” as such never comes up, but there is repeated parrying by Martin of Colbert’s repeated reference to Mother T’s “not believing in God,” in view of recent stories based on her just published letters. 

“Not feeling his presence” was the gist of Martin’s reply, made with perfect good humor.  Look here for it.

McGuire, collared, still wears the collar

More bad news about Rev. Donald McGuire, the Jesuit, with the provincial, Ed Schmidt, sounding without a clue in this Sun-Times piece by its alert religion writer:

He’s been convicted twice, jailed twice — but his order lets him wear the collar, won’t say if he’ll be kicked out

Moreover, mum’s the word on whether the province has gone to Rome about him to get him literally defrocked.

Big image problem here in his nephew going after him as lawyer for the latest accuser. 

“It’s time we took [the collar] away,” said Kevin McGuire, the priest’s nephew and a lawyer for “John Doe 116,” who’s suing the priest and the Jesuits.


Schmidt, however,

“can’t find anything in the Jesuits’ rules” permitting him to ask Donald McGuire to stop dressing as a priest.


A helpless giant, apparently.

New York leads way

My, how they talk in New York, and this is not Murdoch’s Post:

The politics of Iraq, tilting strongly against the war for two years, will likely move back toward the center now, thanks to the impressive testimony of our top commander and to the outrageous attacks on him by some Democrats and their party’s wackadoo wing.

Can we imagine anything this pointed, this clear, this non-Dem-party commentary at Chi Trib and Sun-Times?

Yes, at Chi Trib, which has catholic taste for its op-ed page.  But not at S-T, where some mythical left-wing blue-collar audience waits eagerly for editorials that call for boycotting BP, etc.

The web head, “Petraeus brings the facts, but some Dems can’t handle the truth,” is apt. 

Trib libs have day, Sun-Times catches up

Neither of Chicago’s biggest papers show much interest in what Gen. Petraeus said in the last two days.  Their interest lies in Dems’ responses — it’s their party, is it not? — and Moveon-dot-org talking points.  Tom Frisbie, more leftist than I’d realized, has a cartoon for S-T likening Petraeus to Gen. Westmoreland in the Viet Nam war.  He really believes that stuff, apparently.  Tsk, tsk.

Chi Trib yesterday in hard copy — and it’s hard copy we are talking about here, not web sites — featured the general and the ambassador, Ryan Crocker, about equally.  It reminded me of the old joke about the diocesan newspaper headline, “Tornado in Oklahoma: No Catholics Killed.”

Random nuggets . . .

In his review of S.A. Venkatesh’s Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor (Harvard) in the 6/22/07 Times Lit Supplement, Paul Seabright, U. of Toulouse econ prof and author of The Company of Strangers: A natural history of economic life, 2004, accepts V’s assessment of rampant intelligence among S. Side Chi residents (dubious tho it may be) but notes the non-transferability of the skills by which they survive.

Much of their capital turns out to be highly personalized, dependent on their network of contacts and loyalties, on favours given and returned, and to have little or no value to anyone who tries to set up in a different city or even a different neighbourhood.  People are risk-averse, and the neighbourhood is an informal insurance system, so it takes an unusual degree of self- assurance to take the gamble of leaving.

He asks what would help, for instance, more or less regulation of “labor markets.”

After all, regular jobs at the minimum wage are a luxury here, so does this make the minimum wage an irrelevance, or is it a part of the problem?

I have my strongly held opinion in this matter, having embraced the teaching of F.A. Hayek in these matters.  Even without it, however, Wal-Mart wages seem irrelevant in this situation, as opposed to legislated ones.  The starving man is glad for bread, and telling him to eat cake for the sake of union power is not a good idea.

more more more

Coming up on the St. Sabina RC parish calendar is Bible class by televangelist Tommy Tenney, of Godchasers Network, tonight at 7.  Tenney is a white guy out of Pinevilla, LA.  It is not surprising that he’s not RC, which I presume he is not, because with all its protesting and marching and hosting Dem pols and other demagogs in the pulpit, St. Sabina is a Bible church.

That is, most of its members are black church-goers, which means mostly evangelical-oriented.  When the irrepressible, undigestable Al Sharpton mounted the pulpit a few years back for a largely political harangue, the packed church included people who consulted their Bibles, not their missals, during the service.  Pfleger is successful because he plays not only to black social concerns but also to their Bible orientation.

In this he isn’t out of sync with Things Catholic, where The Word has come to equal if not supersede The Sacrifice in importance.  He just goes at it more vigorously.  I’m sure this Tenney fellow is a boffo performer.  And I’d like to say the same for more Catholic preachers and teachers.

more more more

“Thank you, Christopher,” Hugh McDiarmid’s wife wrote him, using his real name, after he’d written a glowing poem about her, he having been a very difficult husband for many years.  “Always remember . . . I love you and only you.”  But she added, pointedly and poignantly, “ . . . and could have been so very much more if you’d only let me.”

This from her letters to him, edited by Beth Junor, in a TLS review 8/10/07.

more more more

In his review of DESIRING ROME. Male subjectivity and reading Ovid’s “Fasti” (Ohio State) in TLS 6/8/07, T.P. Wiseman skewers author Richard J. King for characterizing Ovid as “submissive, feminized and, of course, symbolically castrated” (Wiseman’s words).

“If psychoanalysis has a value,” Wiseman writes of such a treatment, “it is surely therapeutic. There seems little point in attempting it on a man who has been dead for nearly two millennia.”

I’d say so.

more more more

And finally, world population growth since the 1950s has been not from people “breeding like rabbits” but from their no longer “dying like flies,” says an unnamed UN advisor quoted by Bjorn Lomborg in his Skeptical Environmentalist.  You can remember something like that.  All things being equal, a simile works better than a metaphor.

Tragedy again, latest in a long line

Cardinal George got a kindly reception at abuse-plagued St. Agatha Church yesterday but couldn’t keep his sharp, logical tongue in check anyhow.

Asked as he left the friendly St. Agatha confines what he thought of Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) protesting his imminent election as president of the U.S. bishops conference, he said, “I don’t think they have any credibility on that issue.”

A low blow?  Or badly aimed, as gun shot at one’s foot by the church leader who has nothing to say about his priest’s felonious sexual assault on children in his care but to call it “tragedy.”

Isn’t tragedy what you can’t avoid?  The horrors visited by the gods, or for us Christians, God, willy-nilly?  The Greeks — Sophocles and the like, not restaurant-owners coast to coast — made an excess of a good thing.  Your chief virtue did you in, you got a big head, fell victim to hubris, and there you were, caught in disaster not entirely of your making.

Not so.  Today, even for learned prelates, a tragedy is something clearly bad though only vaguely to be blamed on anyone.  So guns kill people, not people, the shot not the shooter, the SUV not the driver. 

Likewise, who’s to blame for the dreadful incidents at St. Agatha?  “We have tried to figure out where were the betrayals, what went wrong,” the cardinal told the eminently forgiving parishioners, gathered for him to install the new man as pastor.

Isn’t there something plaintive about that?  We have tried.  And trying is next to godliness, which robs protesting SNAP of its credibility, does it not?  Is there hubris in that? 

Moreover, there may be more to this than has met the eye so far, said George:

“A lot of that is still a story that is not truly told, for various reasons,” George said. “Sometimes things don’t become really clear for many years, and sometimes, perhaps, not until Christ returns.”

Whoa.  Not truly equals falsely, I think.  Various reasons?  Uh-oh.  Someone’s been lying, though this churchman would prefer not to use the word.  And why?  We don’t know, and may never know until the Second Coming.

Is that nonsense, or what?  We do know that no one has been penalized for letting the offender not only pass but thrive under George — who made him a vicariate dean, for gosh sakes, weeks before his arrest.  In fact, nothing has slowed the promotion machine, as Sun-Times pointed out months ago:

Top leaders in the Archdiocese of Chicago responsible for complaints about predatory priests kept their positions or rose in the church in the aftermath of the Rev. Daniel McCormack’s 2006 arrest, according to archdiocesan reports and interviews. Vicar General George Rassas was elevated to auxiliary bishop. Chancellor Jimmy Lago was named the primary point person on child abuse cases. Leaders from the offices of Vicar for Priests to Protection of Children and Youth stayed in key positions,

the paper had last July — scroll down and pay $2.95 to see whole article.  Must we wait for Jesus in a cloud of glory to know what all that’s about? 

Meanwhile, what would it be like to hear from George’s lips “disgusting” about the abuser’s behavior?  Can he say he feels “lousy” about it?  He should at least try.  It would be quite an improvement on invoking mystery and getting snappish with SNAP.