Former Pope’s name removed as co-author of book on celibacy

An unholy mess involving (some) holy people.

Pope-emeritus Benedict has requested that his name not be listed as the co-author of a new book defending the Church’s tradition of celibacy, after the release of excerpts from the book triggered a fiercely partisan reaction.

The book has an essay by Cardinal Sarah and another by Benedict, each in agreement with the other. But leave the latter off the cover!

Well look, it happens all the time in the wild world of book publishing. It doesn’t?

Meanwhile as happens often in the current papal incumbency, the cat has the Big Man’s tongue. By no means is he inactive, however. We may be sure of  that.

So. Consider this by way of analysis by the veteran careful observer at Catholic World News:

The intemperate reactions to the appearance of a written work by the former Pope, and the embarrassing sequence of public statements by Church officials, highlights the tensions that now prevail at the Vatican.

It seems clear that intense pressure was put on Pope-emeritus Benedict, Cardinal Sarah, and  Archbishop Ganswein [Benedict’s spokesman, and former secretary] to the lessen the impact of the new book.

Tight little island, full of jockeying for position.

 Via Catholic Culture

A Bombshell Book. Ratzinger and Sarah Ask Francis Not to Make an Opening for Married Priests – Settimo Cielo – Blog – L ’Espresso

Francis stymied?

It will be a serious problem, in fact, for Francis to make an opening for the married priesthood and the female diaconate after his predecessor and a cardinal of profound doctrine and of radiant holiness of life like Sarah have taken such a clear and powerfully argued position in support of priestly celibacy, addressing themselves to the reigning pope almost in the words of an ultimatum, through the pen of the one but with the full agreement of the other.

Speaking up, they rise to the occasion.

Something vaporous from the Holy Father, This week: a surprise in his ‘State of the World’ address

Joy to the world . . .

Sunday sermons, weekday observations

His surprise:

The Holy Father devoted more attention [than to
U.S. actions in the Middle East, about which he was “clearly
distressed] to his own proposal for a “global compact on education”—an initiative that will be launched at a “worldwide event” on May 14. The Pontiff described this effort as a bid “to rekindle our commitment to and with young people,” to provide for “a process of education and the creation of an educational village capable of forming a network of open and human relationships.”

Something for the United Nations, maybe. Equally vaporous.

There he goes again, working to make the Church one big one-world social services provider — with a dollop of Catholicity, not enough to offend anybody.

View original post

Wash Post at service of Dems but also of DC regulars . . .

Something I hear called the Deep State? I think that’s it.

At Power Line, we sometimes refer to the Washington Post as an adjunct of the Democratic Party. To an even greater degree, the Post is an adjunct of official Washington — the cadre of career bureaucrats and former officials who consider it their God given right to set policy, regardless of what elected officials desire. (There is, of course, considerable overlap between official Washington and the Democratic Party).

Thus, it’s not surprising that a few minutes after I read Steve’s post called “Trump’s sin: Conducting foreign policy without permission,” I read this Washington Post story called “Trump is short on advisers, allies as he faces Iran crisis.” In this article, the Post argues, is essence, that Trump is committing the sin of conducting foreign policy without permission.

Who or what does he think he is, anyhow?

The Jesuit who never did come out of the cold

But stayed within the leftist cocoon where he found a lot of other Jesuits, embracing the elusive “option for the poor” and other seductive Marxist initiatives. Alas, this meant certain activities or inactivities which ignore the plight of the oppressed, as is observed in this NC Register article about a questionable jubilee:

An emphasis on social reform becomes a slippery thing, as the preferred means of social reform — political action — can displace the gospel itself. Consider Father Sosa, who is from Venezuela.

Venezuela’s Maduro regime is the leading violator of human rights in Latin America, the cause of starvation levels of poverty in what should be a rich country, and the largest producer of refugees in the world.

Yet Father Sosa is largely silent about all of this, embracing instead a politics that prefers not to criticize leftist regimes. Politics here trumps social justice.

That would be Father Arturo Sosa, the Jesuit superior general, who was on hand for the celebration in Rome of a major Jesuit social-action initiative.

He also “denies the historicity of the gospels” and “doesn’t believe that the devil exists.” Or didn’t until changing his mind three months later.

Wot the hell? Wot the hell, Archie?

Consider Rick Morrissey covering the Care Bears at the end of a mediocre season . . .

He makea-me laugh . . .

Chicago Newspapers

. . . He opens today’s loving analysis of the Monsters of the Midway at season’s end:

The Bears finished near the bottom of the NFL in offensive production, but let’s keep our eyes on the prize, folks: They led the league in teammates who really, really care about each other.

Coach Matt Nagy preached the camaraderie gospel all year, and it figures to pay off in a big way when the guys share feelings and toast marshmallows at the postseason camping trip.

Alas, however, “a ton of issues.”

View original post

WHEN A FRIEND CROSSES THE BAR . . . A Jesuit funeral sermon, February, 2000

Sanctifying grace . . .

Dominus Vobiscum: Notes from a massgoer's underground

Pat preached. He had two points to make, he said, “before I get to Peter.” Peter was the deceased, his friend of 49 ½ years, since the two of them entered the Jesuits. Pat’s two points were that he stood on “holy ground” there in the retirement center for Jesuits of eight upper Midwestern states and that their suffering (as sick, invalided, dying) was “salvific.”

This “salvific” is related to “terrific” in its ending. The s-a-l-v part is related to “salvation,” as of souls. If something is salvific, it makes for, contributes to salvation of souls. It’s a Latin-word-turned-English, a staple of the course on divine grace – God’s gift to people that brings them around to (a) straight-and-narrow-path behavior and (b) everlasting life.

If you knew the vocabulary, as the Colombiere Center congregation did, you got Pat’s message: Pete, stricken with polio 45 years earlier, had not wasted his…

View original post 182 more words