Chi Trib leads charge for Rauner . . .

. . in full throat, and to good effect.

Dear Gov. Rauner: You may be the last, best chance to protect Illinois’ future. . . . . The spring session has been Madigan and Cullerton’s time. Now it’s your time. You come across as a patient man who knows he was elected to govern for four years, not just the first five months. You also come across as a focused man. A governor who won’t flinch.

This must gall the hell out of Dems. In his town hall sessions in 2013, the heart of a book I am putting together about Blue Illinois as argued by Ruling Party minions, Sen. Don Harmon of Oak Park took early shots at the Trib as having “bashed the heart out of us.”  . . . .

For the rest, go to Illinois Blues

The Pope’s tongue gets forked when he requires so much explanation

Company Man

John Allen predicts reaction to coming encyclical on the environment, starting with headlines saying Pope “backs strong limits on greenhouse gas emissions,” as if he “issued a political manifesto aligning himself with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, if not Greenpeace.”

That won’t be “entirely wrong,” says Allen.

Francis is indeed likely to accept the scientific consensus [sic] that global warming and climate change are real, and that human activity is the main cause. He’ll almost certainly call on nations to take strong action to address it. [Italics added]

Ah relevance, that will of the wisp that draws even supreme pontiffs into its orbit.

Question: Accepting this so-called consensus (consider the rascally deniers if you dare), will the Pope say why he accepts it? Will he invite discussion? (Heh: When do preachers invite discussion of anything?)

Will he become an important source for the global scientific community…

View original post 336 more words

Pope Francis’ heart is in right place, but he’s wrong about capitalism

Company Man

What he should do is read a book by a fellow South American, Hernando de Soto, a Peruvian who came back from a long stay in Europe, saw how poor Peru is, and wondered why.

He might have knit his brow, come up with a theory, and set about to prove it. Instead, he “made an honest search for the truth with an experiment,” writes publicist and former White House speechwriter Mark W. Davis for U.S. News.

His experiment was to open a business in Lima without bribing anyone. It would be a small garment factory — two sewing machines — which he would register with a government agency as required.

Sure he would, after standing in line and filling out forms for 289 days. It’s how small businesses get started all over the have-not (developing) world — everywhere “a paper jungle.” Which makes it impossible, so they…

View original post 133 more words

What the heck is it to be conservative?

From today’s Sardonic Ex Curia posting:

Parents may not be consenting to their moral relation; but consenting or not, they are bound to a long train of burdensome duties towards those with whom they have never made a convention of any sort. Children are not consenting to their relation, but their relation, without their actual consent, binds them to its duties; or rather it implies their consent because the presumed consent of every rational creature is in unison with the predisposed order of things. – Edmund Burke

How about that “predisposed order of things”? A conservative bedrock.

Spirituality vs. Religion

Not quite. Religion is for providing the motions to go through when you have lost track of spirituality. Go through them long and faithfully enough, and you have a chance of regaining or gaining spirituality. “I believe, Lord; help thou my unbelief” is your motto.

Wheat or Weeds

My good friend Joey once told me, “Religion is for people who don’t want to go to hell and spirituality is for people who have already been to hell and don’t want to go back.”

The first part of the statement definitely rang true in my early years of life.  I went to Catholic church every week, said my prayers, gave a little, but always felt like something was missing. It wasn’t until I went into my deep depression that I realized what that was. A personal intimate relationship with Jesus Christ.

Now this isn’t something that could be obtained by going through the religious rituals that I had been doing. I needed to put my faith into action.  But how would I know that I was actually following God’s plan for my life?

Well I guess that’s why they call it faith because to be honest I didn’t…

View original post 220 more words

The Irish did what? Begorra!

How to view the Irish vote, from American Catholic:

Now that Ireland has voted to approve gay marriage, a few thoughts:

1.   Catholic Ireland is now Anti-Catholic Ireland-The Irish have always found scapegoats useful as an explanation for Irish failings.  Britain long played this role and the Church is now filling this role.  This vote, for many of the voters, was a joyous opportunity to give a one finger salute to the faith of their ancestors.

2.   Spineless Shepherds-With one or two exceptions, the Irish episcopate was worse than useless.  Cowardice was their most notable attribute.  Expecting these timeservers to stand up for Catholicism in a hostile environment is like expecting a wolf to become a vegetarian.

3.   Pope-MIA-The Pope has endless time to waste on made up problems like global warming, and to make snide remarks about faithful Catholics, but he uttered not a word on this vote.  In the current feeble state of the Church in the face of her enemies, the fish does rot from the head down.

4.   No Representation-All the major parties in Ireland backed gay marriage, so the 38% of the Irish people who voted against it, a huge block of voters in a proportional parliamentary system like Ireland, effectively have no political voice.

5.   Iron Triangle-In Ireland government, academia and entertainment were all overwhelmingly in favor of gay marriage.  The group think on this issue makes the old Iron Curtain countries seem diverse in comparison. Continue reading

Read on for the other five.