. . . he says.

It was other people’s money, so what, he worry?

This lady is against “insider dawdgie trading.”

[It’s almost at the end, 3:30 or so. Or
listen to it all, since it’s a pretty good exchange, if frenetic as
usual.]

When you put it that way, it’s a no-brainer.

From friend Peter of the EPA (of all places*):

The secret of a good sermon is to have a good beginning and a good ending; and to have the two as close
together as possible

– George Burns

The one-world, Global Fed idea, ish!

But back in the day, she wouldn’t even be interviewed!

Same Stepha- when his boss set reported-abuse records.

Here’s Stephanopoulos, on page 267 of his autobiography “All Too Human,” “Most important, I wanted to keep reports of Paula [Jones’] press conference off television … It wasn’t a hard sell.” His book goes on to say how he tried to discredit her. Yes, this openly Democratic operative is a “newsman” now.

And therefore qualified to huff ‘n puff.

Telling why he hesitated to leave the anti-Vatican 2 Society of St. Pius X, biographer of its founder says it was partly because of his:

occasionally having to attend mainstream liturgies for weddings or funerals, all celebrated with varying degrees of cringe-making banality or abuse. Who could live with all that, day in and day out? Wouldnt I be risking my soul to walk into such a situation? No, the SSPX seemed to be, to use a perennial tautology, a safe haven for a Catholic in the current climate.

They do induce cringes, do they not?

Nope.

Abuse. Or inappropriate behavior.

And the nation, global-competitively speaking.