Wages of socialism

You sigh, the song begins, you speak and I hear violins
It’s magic.
— Sammy Cahn and Jule Styne

Like the alleged living wage, which if mandated by government magically adds to prosperity, as we hear from our socialist friends and neighbors, who have unswerving belief in the power of government to save the world.

He can who thinks he can. The little engine that could. Socialists, democratic or the other kind — think Soviet, think National as in Germany in the ’30s and ’40s, think autocracies all over the world who run the banner of gummint uber alles.

These living-wage people need a new name. C’mon, reinvent yourselves. The red flag don’t fly hereabouts. We are too bourgeois, for all our flirting with pie in the sky before we die.

Such as Illinois Democrats spending, borrowing, spending some more, and look where we are now, will you? Heading up that old creek sans paddle in a cast-iron canoe. Not there quite yet. Give us time.

As for that mandated wage — telling employers what to pay employees, or else, or else what? After that, what? Tell them how to price their goods? Prix fixe for all!

That’s mandated wage all over, a fixed price. There’s a labor market, out of which can be priced hordes of people not worth the price. Wages are competitive or not, right? We can price ourselves or be priced out of that market.

Socialist policies do that. Want to know about democracy in the workplace, and anywhere else you look? It’s the will of the people. When they say free market, that’s what they have in mind: lots of people vote on what to pay for things and that vote prevails. It’s their money.

So when there’s something to sell, a man’s time for instance, democracy calls for open bidding, not a state directive. Free market, unhindered by government interference.

No price-fixing.

Wis. Dems have Dem Socialist leader

Dem Socialists exposed among Wisconsin senators who fled.

They are very vocal in Oak Park, where they tried for a “living wage” ordinance and failed.

It’s one of them I heard at a meeting of Oak Park lefties that in his speech the night before, Obama had given them “permission to hate insurance companies,” about which questioned, he specified “health insurance.” Gotta get those things straight.

Don’t you just hate it when they talk that way?

Official presidential portrait of Barack Obama...
He gave permission.

Here’s a new blog — Climate of Hate — dedicated to the proposition that hate lives! in political discourse in the U.S., especially on the left.

Clever indeed, and a blog whose time has come.

Seeing it, I am reminded of what I heard at a meeting of Oak Park leftists at the library in September of 2009, on the day after Obama had said, “The time for games [had] passed” in the matter of health care legislation in a speech to Congress.

“He gave us permission to hate the insurance industry,” said a Democratic Socialist, former Beye School parent (when my wife & I were Beye parents), former neighbor (a block over), who was busy at the time trying (without success) to get the village to enforce a “living wage” for its employees and employees of all who do business with or have received a subsidy from the village.

I’d been writing for the Wed. Journal of OP&RF, and his wife, also there to plan events etc., asked if I would be writing it in the Journal.  (I wouldn’t, having resigned as columnist.)  She clearly did not relish the idea, but he just wanted to be sure he meant health and not auto, etc. insurance.  In fact, he was looking pretty pleased with having said it in my hearing.

And nobody else at the meeting (of 10 or so) seemed to object to his saying that, though not all would have said it.  A fellow Dem Socialist (of America) seemed equally pleased, however.

Permission to hate, given by the president.  What do you know about that?