| You have this Christian quirk about gay marriage. Hey, you were practically born with it.You become a latter-day Bartleby the Scrivener(apologies to Herman Melville, wherever he is, and if there’s a heavenly niche for great writers, that’s probably his location).That is, you’d prefer not to be the photographer at a gay wedding.You do not intend to interfere with the gay ceremony.
You will not call out from the congregation your objection when the minister or judge asks, if he or she does, whether anyone has an objection to the procedure. You will not (let’s say, anyhow) write a letter to your local editor or, God forbid, blog the matter. You just, like Bartleby, prefer not, for your quirky Christian reasons, to be the photographer. What’s more, you reside and work in New Mexico. Wherefore: . |
Tag: politics
Italian conundrum: Catholic = fascist?
In Italy, says Nicholas Farrell, in Taki’s Magazine,
Catholics and fascists are both keen on intervention by totalitarian higher bodies such as the state in both life and work, and they are hostile to individual freedom and the free market.
And maybe not only there, if there. It goes with my tentative observations in the past about the church and political freedom — here, for instance:
I have in mind [when discussing “backward thinking”] the American church’s ambivalence toward governmental interference in people’s lives.
In 1919, for instance, Monsignor John A. Ryan issued the Bishops’ Program of Social Reconstruction, a virtual blueprint for the New Deal.
For 20 years [Ryan] reigned supreme as the bishops’ spokesman on social and political matters, even endorsing Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936 for his second term. In the years since then, leading up to the bishops’ acquiescence in the passage of Obama care, official Catholic statements have consistently favored liberal positions in regard to governmental interference.
More recently, of course, they have objected to the HHS requirement that Catholic schools and hospitals offer birth control, but it took such an obvious interference in church activity to get them to do so.
The church has not been a champion of political freedom (I tentatively reiterate), being overly concerned about the mistakes and bad things people can commit and insufficiently confident or at least trustful when it comes to use by them of God-given (by whom else, pray tell?) free will, not to mention reliance on divine grace, mercy, and all that.
Is this where libertarianism meets Divine Providence? Just asking.
Liz Warren gaining in Mass.!

Voters in the commonwealth care not if she fibbed about Indian-ness to game affirmative action to become a Harvard prof.
. . . this is a by-product of living in a liberal state. Most folks here in the Bay State not only favor affirmative action but see nothing wrong with Warren’s claims even if they are dubious. In which case, Scott Brown could be in a lot of trouble.
If voters in Connecticut didn’t care about Richard Blumenthal misrepresenting his military service, is it really a stretch to imagine that Massachusetts voters won’t care if Elizabeth Warren lied about being Native American to advance her career?
Sheeple, please!
Liberal sound-alikes

Obama and Ms. Warren of Massachusetts:
President Barack Obama and Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren have more in common than just their liberal political ideology, Harvard Law pedigree, and Democratic Party affiliation. Both claim Cherokee ancestry, and neither can prove it.
Birds of a feathah!
Irish come out fighting
Hopey changey not working out at Notre Dame. Nothing says more about this most obvious overreaching by the boy president.
Give a look at some nuts and bolts of it, noting while you are at it, this pungency:
The [legal] background [of the HHS mandate] is farcical. It represents administrative law brought to us by Laurel and Hardy, or Professor Irwin Corey, or the dictator of that Central American country featured in Woody Allen’s Bananas.
There are 12 suits, of course, each identically worded. Chicago is not suing, but from Illinois, Springfield and Joliet are suing. Can you imagine Chicago getting really serious about fighting Obama and the Dimmycrats?
Cardinal George and his archdiocese are
“ . . . obviously deeply concerned about preserving the Catholic identity of Catholic educational, health care and social service organizations,” George said in a statement. “The Archdiocese therefore entirely supports the actions of the Catholic dioceses and organizations that have brought suit against the Department of Health and Human Services for violating the heretofore constitutionally guaranteed religious freedom of Catholic institutions.”
Nicely, if professorially, said. But not part of the suit? Why not?
Chicago police
Chief McCarthy just now on Roe, WLS-AM: terrific. Police did great job with protests, his discussing it with Roe was muy impressive. Nice to win one for once, and big feather in cap of Rahm, who stayed way back and did not let himself be drawn into media commentary. Contrast it with Richie M. Huge difference.
JP Morgan Chase looking a mite tattered
This JP Morgan business is beginning to look like a case of Jamie, we hardly knew you. We meaning people on the street never did know him, but some thought they did, and it is to them I refer, including the presidential amateur who says Chase bank is so very well operated. It is?
(Jamie as in Dimon, of course, close buddy of The Amateur.)
Dissecting Wendell Berry

It’s what Royko hung on Jerry Brown. Never more fitting here.
Eloquent comment on war on women
From Pekin (IL) Daily Times columnist Dave Simpson (brother of Oak Parker Ray).
Look out, Chicago, look out, Illinois

It’s your pension funds, stupid. Chapter 9 could be coming their way, and yours.