Reid-Pelosi around O’s neck?

Quick, before I forget this: Obama should be saddled with Reid and Pelosi at least as much as he wants to saddle McCain with Bush.  Two long years ago, they got their majorities, and look where we are.

Well, I looked that up and found my idea is old.  Repubs were about to use

“Pelosi-Reid-Obama” in the all-in-the-same-breath way that Democrats now use “Bush-McCain” — to make the parties’ popular candidates indistinguishable from their less beloved incumbents.

Did they?  Did McCain?  Well, here’s McCain today in Miami, among other things defending Joe the Plumber:

Let me give you the state of the race today. We have 18 days to go. We’re 6 points down. The national media has written us off. Senator Obama is measuring the drapes, and planning with Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid to raise taxes, increase spending, take away your right to vote by secret ballot in labor elections, and concede defeat in Iraq. But they forgot to let you decide. My friends, we’ve got them just where we want them.

And here’s a chilling reminder of what’s ahead if Obama wins:

If the current polls hold, Barack Obama will win the White House on November 4 and Democrats will consolidate their Congressional majorities, probably with a filibuster-proof Senate or very close to it. Without the ability to filibuster, the Senate would become like the House, able to pass whatever the majority wants.

[Review & Outlook] AP

Though we doubt most Americans realize it, this would be one of the most profound political and ideological shifts in U.S. history. Liberals would dominate the entire government in a way they haven’t since 1965, or 1933. In other words, the election would mark the restoration of the activist government that fell out of public favor in the 1970s. If the U.S. really is entering a period of unchecked left-wing ascendancy, Americans at least ought to understand what they will be getting, especially with the media cheering it all on.

In brief, this is coming:

WSJ on super Dems

That union card check means no more secret ballot in union elections and mandatory unionization that works this way:

The bill also imposes a compulsory arbitration regime that results in an automatic two-year union “contract” after 130 days of failed negotiation. The point is to force businesses to recognize a union whether the workers support it or not. This would be the biggest pro-union shift in the balance of labor-management power since the Wagner Act of 1935.

Not bad for a community organizer.

Funny papers

If I had a dog named Zero, I’d say “Gloryosky” to him, having discovered that yesterday’s Chi Trib made not ‘arf bad reading, though I’ll be darned if I can come up with anything astonishing.  In fact, the only part I saved for my next-day story is the former Metro section, now “Chicagoland,” with the Fry’s electronics display ad telling us about ACER NETBOOK Aspire One 8.9″ Intel Atom N270 1.6 GHz 1GB RAM 120GB Hard Drive Webcam 802.11G Wireless 2.19lbs Windows XP HOME.  For a lousy $349.99, sans rebate! (But nothing about wi-fi capacities.  Hmm.) 

[Later: Wrong-o.  Was thinking of something else.  As Andy K. says in the comment, “802.11G Wireless” means wi-fi.  As the (white) kid said to me the other day on the sidewalk, “My bad.”  (In Oak Park you pick up the lingo.)]

So what did Boy Genius do?  The one you’re talkin’ to right here?  He frittered away the day walking around and (not kidding) doing some work for pay until it was bedtime, and then what?  Next day called up www.frys.com and found the beautiful item was Sold Out!  So back he is to Square One in re: buying self a nice XP-fitted laptop — with wi-fi.  More later on this incredible adventure.

Editorially speaking, Trib’s Chicagoland had a revelatory piece by Dan Mihalopoulos, “A multiplicity of mouthpieces,” i.e. spokespeople, with lots about Marilyn Katz, fingered by Kass in his column as a “former ’60s radical” who

during the violent protests of the 1968 Democratic National Convention here . . . was the security chief for the radical Students for a Democratic Society. She once advocated throwing studded nails in front of police cars, back in the SDS days when the group was alleged to have thrown cellophane bags full of human excrement at cops and cans of urine and golf balls impaled with nails.

Ah Marilyn, we hardly know you from those palmy days, now you’ve come so far up the occupational tree as to flack for Mayordaley II, not to mention The One (“that one,” said McCain, not dismissively enough, in the last debate, and howls went up ‘round the world from various apparatchiks), for whom she dishes sweet nothings for the unsuspecting (in any case compliant) medium performers.

“What Bill Ayers and [former Black Panther, now U.S. Rep.] Bobby Rush . . . did 40 years ago has nothing to do with [the presidential campaign],” Katz was quoted as saying in the Chicago Sun-Times in April. “[Ayers] has a national reputation. He lectures at Harvard [University] and Vassar [College].”

Now wait a minute, as The One says, setting a questioner straight.  Vassar had Commie scum (make that dingbat) Angela Davis as baccalaureate speaker for the 1993 graduation, so don’t give us that stuff, Marilyn dear.  I vass dere and heard her tell the mush-brained graduates and the non-mush-brained among them that Marxism was not dead (to applause).  And the school had a lecture series named after her in the early 70s, part of its Black Studies program, yes!

The whole M-Katz business — her radical, violence-connected past stemming from, we presume, her all-around impatience and self-absorption now morphed into highly viable political strategy aimed at achieving the same social-control things as before — shows how those creepy people can gain acceptance and traction in the world as it works.

Do we think Mayordaley II worries about radicalism of people who support him?  Do we think Obama, cut of the same cloth, worries about it?  No.  These people know how to get things done, and that’s the issue for them.  The rest is nonsense.

My newly found pro-tem grudging respect for the new Chi Trib can be summed up: you get used to the format.  I knew I would, assuming it’s not wildly mixed up.  The content is another story, but what else is new?

However: There was the page-one reefer on Friday (10 Oct), over the top, to a Kass column “on the end of the Pool Boy probe,” supposed to be on page 2.  It wasn’t.  Not in my hard copy.  It’s here but wasn’t there.  Odd, to say the least.

Pool boy is “a top political operative for Mayor Richard Daley who ran a patronage army for the mayor and was the city airports operation boss.”  Pool Boy because a few years back he dug one in his back yard that flooded neighbors’ yards.  He made a call and got ComEd to hook up a special power source for his house when power was out for the neighbors.  Or many of us presume that.

“Stupid,” the mayor called it at the time, shrinking from “venal” or “disgusting.”  He saves “disgusting” or its synonyms for federal conviction of his lieutenant, a good family man from Nativity BVM in Bridgeport — for running a job scam at the Hall.  [Later: Andy K again.  Nativity of Our Lord.  Sorry.]

Still, that was quite an admission by Daley, that his airports executive did something stupid, and Kass was clearly impressed.  He notes that the airports boss got fired immediately, before the inspector general could knock on his door, going with a company that sells a lot of stuff to the airports.  Close one there.  Is he a good family man?

Many of us think Pool Boy put in a call.  No, the true version, passed on by Kass, is that the whole thing was coincidental.  We know because ComEd began a 63–day investigation into the matter, which like the Hundred Year’s War could not be called that until it was over, which it was when Kass got an email from a Com Ed v.p., who explained that in this matter

allegations of preferential treatment are simply not true. [She underlined “not true.”] A crew was not [she underlined “not”] directed to the home of David Ochal, former deputy director of aviation, on Wednesday, Aug. 6, to deliver or install a generator or restore power to his home. However, in light of the investigation, the company is using the opportunity to reinforce with employees its storm restoration protocols and implement some process improvements to close some gaps in our reporting and tracking procedures.”

Kass, of course, was delighted. 

You skeptics must be ashamed of yourselves. It wasn’t political clout that got Generator X to Pool Boy’s home. What were you thinking?

He gave the v.p. a jingle, as she had suggested, and got a long, detailed explanation at the close of which Kass, seeking to sum it all up, said, So it’s a coincidence?

Davis [the v.p.] paused on the phone. It was a long pause, at least four seconds.

Was this a coincidence?

“You can call it that if you want to,” said Davis from ComEd.

Why then did Ochal resign? Kass asked, incorrigibly.

Well this woman’s portfolio did not extend that far, like Obama’s as to when you’re old enough to have rights.  “That’s a question you’d have to ask Mr. Ochal. I can’t speak for him,” she said.

Get that long pause on “coincidence.”  This v.p. was not born yesterday.  She could spout nonsense with the rest of them, but she would not fall for that one.  No sirree.

Davis is Tabrina Davis,

former acting director of public affairs at Cook County Hospital, [who was] appointed public information officer [for the Chi Board of Ed in November, 1995]. Salary: $65,000.

So.  She’s political, just the one to catch flak for Com Ed in these troubled times.

One of the late John “Stroger’s soldiers”?  Maybe then, but now she consorts with high social rollers, fellow and sister members of the board of Chicago Children’s Advocacy Center.  She’s an urbane, for all I know lovely person, a joy to know, and ready to tell it like it is when delivering results of a 63–day (!) investigation. 

Congratulations, Tabrina!  But what the heck happened to the hard-copy-Trib version of your investigation as explained by John Kass?  I’ve got another “Gloryosky” in me if you have any ideas to share.

What Sarah knew

Sarah has done me a big personal favor by smoking out David Brooks et al., “conservative” mainstreamers who can’t stand her.  Why a favor?  Because it’s given me a whole new reason for dismantling my respect for those hifalutin guys who have been elevated. 

She has been the bird dog who flushed the pheasants — my man Krauthammer among them! — so as to relieve us peasants of our misplaced sense of allegiance, though I’m still a K-hammer fan, using the even-Homer-nods system.

Meanwhile, she’s on the pan in Alaska, though not yet baked, it appears.  No crime but abuse of governor’s power is alleged by allegedly non-partisan commission.  Why am I skeptical?  Partly because I’m partisan and loathe to believe bad things about my candidate, but moreso because Chi Trib and Sun-Times both blasted it out yesterday as front-page items, which I knew they would when I saw the news on the ‘Net the night before.

From one of the lawyers at Powerline Blog:

The report does not convincingly show that the Palins were driven by the desire to obtain a personal benefit, as opposed to the desire to rid the police force of a bad apple about whom they had personal knowledge. However, Todd Palin’s persistence suggests that, at a minimum, there probably was a personal agenda in the mix.

In the end, it seems to me that Gov. Palin did not exercise particularly good judgment in this matter. But the case that she abused her power by violating the ethics statute and/or that she fired the public safety commissioner because he wouldn’t act against Wooten has not been made.

Nonetheless, the weakly reasoned “Troopergate” report may well represent another nail in the McCain-Palin coffin.

Calm reason here?  Powerline people are very sharp and have had doubts about Sarah P. from the start.  See also Wall Street J:

A long-awaited Alaska legislative report concluded that . . . Gov. Sarah Palin, abused her authority and broke state ethics law by trying to remove her former brother-in-law from his job as a state trooper.

But the report also concluded that the Republican governor did not unlawfully fire her public-safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, who said he had been pressured to oust the trooper, Mike Wooten. The report said other factors were involved in Mr. Monegan’s controversial dismissal.

New Criterion editor Roger Kimball goes further:

Surgeon General’s Warning: do not drive or attempt to operate machinery while contemplating the just-published 260-odd-page report orchestrated by Hollis French, Alaska legislator and supporter of Barack Obama. French had originally intended to release it October 31, for maximum effect on the campaign. Other legislators prevented that, but the report came out yesterday and guess what? It’s like Oakland according to Gertrude Stein, i.e., there’s no there there, Hollis, no smoking gun, no damning evidence, no nothing except 1) evidence of wasting the taxpayers’ money and 2) engaging in a clumsy smear campaign against Sarah. (Don’t you love the way Team Obama labels every criticism of The Dear One a “smear”: Google “Obama” and “smears”: 1,280,000 items in .13 seconds.)

French hired Steve Branchflower to do the investigating.  It’s his report.  Kimball cites another commentator:

The Branchflower Report is a series of guess and insupportable conclusions drawn by exactly one guy, and it hasn’t been approved or adopted or endorsed by so much as a single sub-committee of the Alaska Legislature, much less any kind of commission, court, jury, or other proper adjudicatory body.

It’s an “episode of political theater that would make Josef Stalin blush,” says this commentator, one Bill Dyer, “ethics violation alleged by partisan hacks,” says another, one Jules Crittenden.

I find these people on the ‘Net, of course, though I’ve been reading Kimball at least since his landmark study of higher-ed corruption, Tenured Radicals: How Politics has Corrupted our Higher EducationLike Kimball they are thoughtful and literate.

Then we have Chi Trib and Sun-Times, who are in the narrative here, part of it as always.  NY Times and to lesser extent Wash Post and their imitators coast to coast have been alerting us to Palin problems for some time now, breathlessly awaiting “troopergate” news, as if to relive the days when Bill Clinton used his state troopers as procurers

Breathlessly they waited, as they did for news dug up about Rep. Barney Frank’s sleeping figuratively and otherwise with Fannie Mae, your friendly government-created mortgage company, the enemy of all that’s fiscally sound, government-created and government-unregulated?  Oh no, much more breathlessly than that.

The cap’s the thing . . .

. . . Wherein I’ll catch the smart voters. 

Beautiful day, sat outside Bread Kitchen for coffee and millet slice while paving crew chewed up North Blvd. a few steps away.  Luckily, the wind blew east, so I didn’t have to swallow pavement dust with my millet.  Fenwick students debarking from eastbound train on way to school bus had to walk through the cloud, however.  Looked like a British movie scene, 1940s smoke-filled train station, you know, the school children on way to the countryside, removed from German bombs.

Pavement crew straw boss spotted me, came over, asked where I got the hat.  My NoObama 68 cap, of course, which has drawn at least five such responses since I began wearing it a few weeks ago.  The tee-shirt shop down the street would make one for you, one guy was told, he told me.  Can’t be too obvious about this, said a woman, who also liked it, this being Oak Park, you know.  “I like your hat,” said the young man carrying stuff to the auto repair (or other) shop in the alley west of OP Ave. between Lake and N. Blvd.  And not a word but a thumbs-up kind of grin from the very button-down business man cycling to the station on Forest Ave. at Ontario. 

Various more or less malevolent glares also, and a startled look from a black business-man-looking guy, but only one voiced negative response, from the counter wench at U.S.A. Liquors, at Harlem & Madison, where the elite meet to buy by the bottle.  She spotted me roaming her aisles looking for something white and “affordable” (by me, that is) and stared.  “You a Republican?” she asked as I plunked my wine on the counter.  She asked in a fairly detached manner but was truly speaking for the multitudes to whom Democrats make their redistributist pitch.  Finally, “Barack’s gonna win,” she said.

Is he?  Charles Krauthammer and the gang at Fox think so — barring an unforeseen intervention.  Rush Limbaugh and James Carville are not so sure about that.  Rush is a great coach for the team.  James darkly hints at riots if he does not win.  Many others, of course, see racism in Obama’s opponents. 

Meanwhile, there’s the anti-Palin phenomenon, riding side by side with the Palin phenomenon.  She’s good, no doubt about it, and she rubs raw the sores of discontent among Dems.  A Knoxville TN blogger says she’s smug.  Not even that she looks smug, but she is.  I think this inaccurate judgement reflects the common resentment of looking sure of oneself.  You’re not supposed to.  You’re supposed to sprinkle your talk with worried you-knows, repeatedly trolling for affirmation. 

If you’re smart, don’t look smart.  But above all, don’t look sure of yourself.  Be apologetic or at least tentative.  Look a little harried too.  Don’t look confident.  Above all, don’t be too Christian about it all, and don’t hold your Down syndrome child so comfortably, especially while you look so good.

Palin and child

Barack and Joe and all that

Good day today, no one scared me s-less by coming up fast behind me on the sidewalk, running or cycling.  Maybe because clouds are pregnant but have not yet come due.  Water is leaking, but that’s all, and in the slightest spray you can imagine.  That’s the weather report in Oak Park.

Last night’s debate was full of excitement.  Would Obama follow the rules or wouldn’t he?  Like Biden, who in his debate just had to get in this or that.  “I have to respond,” etc.  Like a kid who will stamp his feet otherwise.  Typical Democrats.

Biden vs. Palin is A Pursued Man vs. a Finished Woman, i.e. completed.  The Pursued Man has to be right, he has to be liked also, he pastes on the huge smile reminiscent of the circus clown’s painted grin, then erases it, just like that.  He’s less running than on the run.

He doesn’t matter, however.  Never has a candidate so disappeared below media radar.  Who now reads about BidenPalin, on the other hand, is a force to contend with, which is why the zap-a-kid-a-day pro-abort women hate her.  What did that Bernhard comedienne hope for, that Palin would be gang-raped by blacks in Harlem?  Why do Dems always attract such creeps to their bandwagon?

I’ll tell you why.  Because down deep Republicans stand for right reason and controls, and Dems stand for going with the flow, moving on dot-orgying with the zeitgeist, a German word for flow (kidding: look it up, it will do you good).

Meanwhile, McCain limps along, ready to buy all those mortgages.  As usual, it’s the lesser of two bad things this time around.  He’s a battler of sorts and may yet get under Obama’s skin with various attack strategies and may bring in voters who see him as a rock compared to Ba-rock the Slithering Man who didn’t know Bill Ayers was or had been a terrorist! 

Thus ex-Oak Parker, ex-Chi Trib reporter, current chief handler David Axelrod.  Can you imagine?  This adds crass ignorance to Obama’s other unattractive attributes.  Where will it end?

Continue reading “Barack and Joe and all that”

Stuff you can’t make up

In case you missed this, from Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit:

A READER AT A MAJOR NEWSROOM EMAILS: “Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae.

“Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. The fix is in, and its working.”

And yes, Virginia, there is a code of ethics, largely honored in the breach, with a beautiful preamble:

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.

Cut to four reporters in dumpsters in Alaska and four in Arizona.  Cut to Acorn operative registering dead people.  Cut to . . . 

Cut it out!  I can’t stand it!

I may vomit some more

The Obamas: Portrait of an American Family

Soon we will vote for our next president, and for the first time in history, one of the two candidates is a Black man. For a year, Essence pursued an interview with the entire Obama family‹to no avail. Finally, this summer ESSENCE became the only Black media outlet allowed a glimpse into the lives of Barack, Michelle and their two girls, Malia and Sasha, when we were invited to their South Side Chicago home. Weeks later, veteran political journalist Gwen Ifill was with the family as they campaigned in a small mostly White western town, and she flew with them to a Black church in the urban Midwest.

Sounds like a real scoop.

Barack Obama is sitting in the back of his rented luxury campaign bus with its granite counters and two flat-screen TVs. The Illinois senator’s arms are wrapped around his wife, Michelle, whom he doesn’t get to see much these days. At this very moment he is, of all things, singing.

Etc.

No wonder she’s going to ask these questions:

Mayor Palin, Barack Obama is a handsome, charismatic demigod. How many boxes of Kleenex will you need after your crushing loss?

Senator Biden, what is your favorite color? And if you have time for a follow-up question: Why?

Mayor, you talk funny and you own a tanning bed. Why haven’t you released Trig’s birth certificate?

Senator, have you seen those pictures of Obama in his swim trunks? If not, I have them right here.

Etc., here.  And it’s only a partial list!

I may vomit

Doubleday says that [Gwen] Ifill “surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama’s stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power.”

. . . in her new book about “the age of Obama.” 

The title is the opening line of the Monty Wooley character in the 1939 Broadway play and 1942 movie and 2000 TV film (Nathan Lane), “The Man Who Came to Dinner.” 

For a rather fetching mockup of the expected Ifill approach tomorrow night, look here.

Black power

Ifill

Gwen Eye-full hits the bookstands Jan. 20.  It’s The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama, and is sure to be a hit — especially if the Big O. wins next month.  To which end it won’t hurt if S. Palin flops in tomorrow night’s debate, moderated by — yes, the one and only Gwen I.  What do you know about that!

[No fair, says Greta Van S.]