Ceremonials, yes

Clergy abuse rears its ugly head in the Bishop Braxton case:

BELLEVILLE, Ill. (AP) An advocacy group for victims of clergy abuse wants Roman Catholics across southern Illinois to earmark or cut back their tithings to the church until complaints that the bishop misspent money is sorted out.

Pastoral groups in the 104,000-member Diocese of Belleville want Bishop Edward Braxton to address claims that he bought ceremonial garments with about $8,000 in donations to a Vatican world outreach fund.

And the Belleville News-Democrat reports Braxton also may have bought a wooden chancery table and chairs with $10,000 from a fund for children and adults.

Braxton isn’t discussing the complaints publicly.

His ilk is usually above all that public discussion.  Bishop Ed, formerly pastor of Oak Park’s St. Catherine & St. Lucy parish, can afford to ignore this, because he has friends in high places.

Alaska horror

Newsweek has a devastating account of Jesuit malfeasance among Eskimos.

It is one of the darkest chapters of sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church. More than 110 children in Eskimo villages claim they were molested between 1959 and 1986, raped or assaulted by 12 priests and three church volunteers. Families and victims believe that another 22 people were sexually abused by clergy members but have since killed themselves. The Jesuit Oregon Province, which includes Alaska, has agreed to pay $50 million in damages. It is believed to be the largest settlement ever against a religious order.

Religious colonialism.  Closed system.  Rampant lack of accountability.

Forgive me, Father . . .

Richard Sipe dissects and lambastes seminary training in his blog, along the way calling on Andrew Greeley, urging us to

study Greeley’s cardinal [in Cardinal Sins, his 1981 novel] and note his use of confession to ease his conscience, cover his shame, regain his peace of mind, experience relief, but not to change or reform him. The pattern is established in seminary training, but lasts a lifetime in the service of sickness and crime.

Confession as cover-up?

Living With Sins Of The Fathers

In Connecticut this priest adjusts:

When he is training new altar servers, he asks parents to stay for the lessons. If he is measuring young people for robes, he enlists mothers to help him. If there is a church- or school-sponsored field trip, everyone goes on a bus, never alone with him in his vehicle.

“It’s frustrating, I had nothing to do with this, but I just have to face it,” he says. “This is what happened and this is what we will do about it.”

What happened we know about.  How a priest manages things these days we may not know about.

Southern exposure

We knew Catholics aren’t the only ones with abuse problems, but here’s a blog about Southern Baptists:

For faith groups that proactively try to address clergy sex abuse, prevention and compassion go hand in hand.

After all, how will people find out about clergy child molesters if victims are turned away and intimidated when they try to report their abuse?

For Southern Baptists, their leaders are still way behind the curve compared to the leaders of other faith groups.

Southern Baptists don’t even provide a safe place to which victims may report abuse. So most victims don’t try.

It’s worse among them, according to Christa Brown, “the national outreach director for SNAP-Baptist and maintains the StopBaptistPredators.org website. She is a wife, mother, attorney, jazz-lover, slow-runner, and a Southern Baptist abuse survivor”:

Why should anyone believe that Southern Baptist leaders will be able to prevent abuse by clergy child molesters they don’t yet know about when, day in and day out, they do nothing about the clergy child molesters they’re specifically told about?

In addition, Stop Baptist Predators dot org is “the voice of SNAP Baptist.”

Empire strikes Jesuits

Chicago Province Jesuits’ insurance company wants out of the Rev. Donald McGuire SJ suits, claiming

the Jesuits knew of McGuire’s pedophilia as early as 1969 and because they knew of his condition the policy does not cover McGuire, among several other reasons . . .

Empire Indemnity provided

[t]hree umbrella policies . . . to the Jesuits from Nov. 30, 2002 to 2003, then again from 2003 to 2004 and 2004 to 2005. The allegations of abuse by the three John Does does not fall under the coverage period,

its suit filed yesterday in Cook County Circuit Court claims.

Meanwhile,

The Chicago Jesuits have presented McGuire with a dismissal decree from the order, which still needs Vatican approval to become official. McGuire said he has appealed to the Vatican not to allow the dismissal.

However, as extensively documented in a 2004 book, Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II, by Jason Berry and Gerald Renner, the Vatican is extremely reluctant to honor Americans’ requests for prompt punishment of sexual abusers; and the Jesuits may have a long wait before McGuire is expelled.

Two of the boys, it appears

The boys called them the party priests.

They held pool and lake galas where drinks were freely flowing, even for their teenage guests. They let the young boys drive and smoke in their cars, left dirty magazines around the rectory for them to read, and talked openly in graphic terms about sex.

For boys just entering the awkward stages of adolescence, nothing seemed cooler than hanging out with Monsignor Thomas O’Brien and Father Thomas Reardon of Kansas City.

Except for the price that many of the boys — now men — say they paid. They allege that the priests used their positions of power to prey on the youngsters, plying them with alcohol, groping them and offering them money for sex.

The Missouri Supreme Court has cleared two dozen suits for trial.  The trials are coming soon.  Another sorry tale, told in a Kansas City Star takeout of 3,400 words in today’s paper.  At least it’s still news.

He drank, he was improper, so what?

It seems to be an advantage for one’s career as a bishop to be obtuse in matters of priestly sexual abuse patterns. 

Consider the rector of Mundelein seminary in the 90s, Bishop Gerald Kicanas, who had three reports of “sexual improprieties” by then-seminarian Daniel McCormack, in prison since July for molesting five boys while assigned to St. Agatha parish on Chicago’s West Side.

“There was a sense that his activity was part of the developmental process and that he had learned from the experience,” Kicanas said. “I was more concerned about his drinking. We sent him to counseling for that.”

Counseling for drinking, yes.  None for his homosexuality gone rampant?  Or — dare we say it? — for his homosexuality, period?  These were boys McCormack went after — in a black parish, by the way, where the fatherless boy is common.

Do Kicanas, newly elected as vice president of the bishops’ conference with virtual right of succession to the presidency in three years, and other bishops represent the norm with a willingness to look the other way about sexual “impropriety,” in the vast majority of cases homosexual?

He got elected, didn’t he?

Greedy, he wrote

Cardinal George not only considers financial gain the motive force behind proposed state legislation that would widen opening for suing about sexual abuse, he said so in a letter of apology to parents of a victim of two priests, Sun-Times reports tomorrow.

“This is irresponsible, is not about the safety of children as the sponsor claims, and is clearly, to me at least, about money,” he wrote.

The victim, who is not suing, “called the letter outrageous,” Sun-Times reported.

“Victims sue for justice, not for fabulous houses,” said the man, who . . . is negotiating a settlement. “Nobody wants to live in a fabulous house that reminds you that you were molested by two priests as a boy.”

This is George at his blunt best.  He has a knack for the sharp comment that should make his coming term as bishops’ conference president interesting, if not disastrous.

The bill’s introducer, State Sen. Terry Link, a Lake County Democrat, has heard the cardinal talk this way before and has told him it’s offensive.

This is not likely to slow the cardinal down, and his no-holds-barred commentary has echoes in how auxiliary bishop Thomas Paprocki characterized increasing financial pressures from victims.

“This attack is particularly directed against bishops and priests,” he said in a recent speech, adding that the principal force behind the attacks “is none other than the devil.”

Somehow, you’d think he would reserve diabolism for a number of other heinous things.

A year’s work

The Jesuit provincial apparently had his hands tied in discussing the Donald McGuire case in recent weeks:

On Tuesday, Rev. Edward Schmidt, head of the Chicago Jesuits, revealed that he petitioned Jesuit headquarters in Rome more than a year ago seeking McGuire’s dismissal from the religious order. Before his court appearance Tuesday, McGuire received a notice of his termination pending Vatican approval. It is up to the Vatican to remove him from the priesthood, a logical next step after his ouster from the order. [Italics added]

It was in the works, that is, and Schmidt didn’t want to jump the gun, apparently.