Jesuit logic

Two odd things in the latest AP story about Rev. Donald McGuire, the convicted Jesuit priest-pederast:

Asked whether he had taken steps to remove McGuire from the priesthood, [Rev. Edward] Schmidt [S.J., provincial] said the priest was under the supervision of Wisconsin authorities and declined to comment further.

What are these Wisconsin authorities?  Civil, we presume, since McGuire is free on appeal of his sentence to a Wisconsin prison.  But what has that to do with Jesuit discipline?

“Apologies are empty if they are not followed by strong actions,” [victims’ advocacy group spokeswoman] Barbara Blaine said. “Father McGuire is free to roam the streets of Chicago and abuse any child. Their actions tell us they are not concerned about children. They are more concerned about their image.”

He is free to do that, living not in a Jesuit house but in a private home.  Why?  It’s not normal for Jesuits to live outside Jesuit houses.  He’s getting special treatment?

What’s more, if Jesuits have authority in the matter, which we presume they do, why do they seem to care more about McGuire than about his victims, some of whom allegedly suffered as recently as four years ago?

Carrying this further, we assume Schmidt speaks for all Chicago Province Jesuits.  We don’t know who’s taking a different approach privately, within the province, but we know that none is taking it publicly.

Stuff hits fan, provincial does not duck

Rev. Ed Schmidt, the Chicago Province Jesuit provincial superior, is on the hot seat for apparent misfeasance in the Rev. Donald McGuire SJ case.  He won’t say, rather can’t say, if they are trying to expel the convicted, twice-sued pederast McGuire.

Bull, says Rev. Kenneth Lasch, a New Jersey pastor emeritus and canon lawyer outspoken in clergy abuse matters.  “There’s no reason he can’t say, and in fact, it’s an outrage that he doesn’t say,” he told Sun-Times.

Add to that Schmidt’s claim that he does not know how many Chi Prov Jesuits have been accused of child abuse, and you have cause for what in other circles would be called impeachment, unless he’s captive of his consultors and/or someone in Rome.

Done under cover of religion

Chi Trib’s Manya Brachear has more on the Rev. Donald McGuire S.J. suit filed today, with chilling details from the suit and in a news conference:

The parents of the plaintiffs in the latest suit met the priest in 1983 on a spiritual pilgrimage to shrines in Europe. In Lourdes, France, McGuire inspired the mother to convert to Catholicism and asked the father to organize spiritual retreats in Arizona, the plaintiffs’ father said during a news conference Tuesday.

McGuire allegedly abused the older brother, John Doe 117, inside the confessional during those retreats. McGuire later baptized the younger brother, named in the suit as John Doe 118, and presided over the marriage ceremony of John Doe 117. He allegedly abused John Doe 118 at a fundraiser thrown by the family the same weekend as his older brother’s wedding.

The Jesuits apparently had a monster on their hands.

The Donald McGuire story continues

Two more accusers of Father Donald McGuire the Jesuit convicted of sexual abuse, from two brothers in Arizona who today will file suit in Cook County, reports WBBM’s Bernie Tafoya. According to Barbara Blaine of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP),

the young men’s father made a comment about how he thought Fr. McGuire, a family friend, was not guilty of allegations that had been made against him elsewhere, and the oldest told his dad, “I wouldn’t be too sure about that.” That led to questions from the dad; and the 28-year old, a decorated former Marine, admitted he had been molested by Fr. McGuire starting when he was eight or nine years old.

The father later asked his 19-year old son and the son, too, admitted he had been abused by the priest.

This is awful.

Tags: ,