Swinburne, straight flush, Pound

NOT TIRED YET . . . Began day the other day in disappointing fashion, reading Hugh Kenner’s The Art of Poetry, where he gave Algernon Swinburne poem which I liked, “Ballad of Burdens,” in which one burden, about “long living,” says:

Thou shalt fear/ Waking, and sleeping mourn upon thy bed/ And say at night, “Would God the day were here”/ And say at dawn, “Would God the day were dead.”

On which Kenner: “Probably everyone should read enough of Swinburne to get tired of him.”

WHOOSH . . . Sunday 12/2 Sun-Times head caught my attention, for story about #3 Chi cop chasing guys who copped flush handles off urinals at Kennedy-King College: “Alleged copper thief flushed out by police brass.”

POUNDING AWAY . . . Ezra Pound accused fellow poet Lascelles Abercrombie, of “public stupidity” and challenged him. A. suggested as weapon their unsold books at 50 paces.

Pound thought Harriet Monroe’s Poetry Mag not careful enough about quality of what it printed, took to calling it “Harriet’s Home Gazette.” They had been friends, but this tore it.

However, as a sort of poetry doctor, Pound helped fellow writers, including Yeats and Eliot, improve their work. He was “the man you called on when you were having trouble with your lines,” says 11/23/17 Times Lit Supplement reviewer Stefan Collini.

He also helped bail out “habitual sponger” James Joyce.

Writing to his mother from England in 1909:  What’s not interesting and important enough to “be put into poetry” is “hardly worth saying” except as way to put bread on the table. So he turned out “an article a day for weeks” in 1917, compared himself to “a highly mechanized typing volcano.” Was never salaried, had no interest in literary journalism.

Crazy But Ultimately Harmless

Dis guy name Stephen A. Smit’ says down wit’ bloggers.  De guy at deadspin.com has a problem wit’ dat but offers a solution:

We’re not sure how Smith would police his new blog-free society; probably with some sort of expansion of the Patriot Act. Bloggers would be rounded up and sent to Gitmo, there to be made to input guacamole recipes on Rachael Ray’s web site.

Smith, he crazy as a loon.  He reporter at Phila. Inquirer, recently demoted from 76’ers beat as sports columnist.  Too bad.  He have lots to offer.

Wuxtry, wuxtry, Chi Trib lede rocks!

With ledes like this, from veteran wordslinger Jon Van, of the Chi Trib technology beat, writing about what’s to come in Internet speed, newspapers may yet beat the dullness-irrelevance-end-of-line rap:

Like Wild West gunslingers, cable TV operators and telephone companies are squaring off for a contest over who’s the fastest.

The story, interesting in itself and written professionally as befits the lede, is about raising the ante in a telcom (telephone company) vs. cable operators duel in the sun that could lead (not “lede,” note, because does not refer to first paragraph of a news story) to TV on demand on your computer screen.

More to the point right now, the story has this ‘net surfer rethinking his reliance on a telcom connection — SBC’s DSL — and considering an escape to the already faster cable access — Comcast.

More later, I’m sure, on this tech front.

Why he used a manual typewriter

Kevin McGowin, a writer and teacher with two web sites and two computers who was only 30 years old when he wrote this, uses a manual typewriter for writing fiction.

I began this process in 1993, and by the next year had moved to typewriters almost exclusively–because I’m convinced it improves my writing, or at least makes it more like the platonic ideal of the writing I see in my mind’s eye that I would like to produce. And since I’ve made the shift back to the typewriter, I’ve written more and with more discipline, been less hasty and sloppy, and have seen improvement and now feel more confident.

Manual, not electric:

I found that I loved the lack of electricity, of not being “plugged in” to the wall, the feel of the hammers sculpting their shapes onto the paper.

How does it help?

I find my concentration enhanced, my sentences more taut, and by not being able to move around huge blocks of text I find myself more in tune with the narrative flow of the piece.

He’s an afficionado:

I use different machines for different kinds of writing–I’m writing this “personal essay” on my aforementioned first antique manual, a black 1940s Royal KM (like my initials–a famous novelist who admired my poetry gave it to me in 1993). It types small, and works well for essay-type writing. For correspondence, including cover and query letters to editors and publishers, I use a 1935 L.C. Smith upright–I love the way it forms numerals, and the click, the brisk action with which it forms its letters, which are larger than those of the Royal. People like to get letters typed on the Smith, I think–it’s personal, in this age of laser printed mass mailings and the letters are so clear. It types a little slow, which makes it perfect for letter writing, although you might not want to try a novel on it.

For his novels there’s “a beautiful and fast Underwood 11 that has a sound that reminds me of rain.”

Other writers also: novelist Don DeLillo uses a “1950s Olympia Deluxe, [which is] heavy for a portable, but . ..  fast and . . . accurate, a truly great writer’s machine.”

McGowin and his wife live in an apartment now, but look forward to owning “a Queen Anne-style house with hardwood floors and a working typewriter in every room . . . “

Alas, it won’t happen.  Shocking it was to come to the end of his later essay, “Why I Still Use a Manual Typewriter,” part of the beautiful site The Classic Typewriter Page, to read this:

Editor’s note: Kevin McGowin died in an accident on January 18, 2005. He will be missed by his friends and family, by me, and by his many readers on this site and elsewhere. –Richard Polt

May he rest in peace.  I’m stunned.