Greedy, he wrote

Cardinal George not only considers financial gain the motive force behind proposed state legislation that would widen opening for suing about sexual abuse, he said so in a letter of apology to parents of a victim of two priests, Sun-Times reports tomorrow.

“This is irresponsible, is not about the safety of children as the sponsor claims, and is clearly, to me at least, about money,” he wrote.

The victim, who is not suing, “called the letter outrageous,” Sun-Times reported.

“Victims sue for justice, not for fabulous houses,” said the man, who . . . is negotiating a settlement. “Nobody wants to live in a fabulous house that reminds you that you were molested by two priests as a boy.”

This is George at his blunt best.  He has a knack for the sharp comment that should make his coming term as bishops’ conference president interesting, if not disastrous.

The bill’s introducer, State Sen. Terry Link, a Lake County Democrat, has heard the cardinal talk this way before and has told him it’s offensive.

This is not likely to slow the cardinal down, and his no-holds-barred commentary has echoes in how auxiliary bishop Thomas Paprocki characterized increasing financial pressures from victims.

“This attack is particularly directed against bishops and priests,” he said in a recent speech, adding that the principal force behind the attacks “is none other than the devil.”

Somehow, you’d think he would reserve diabolism for a number of other heinous things.

Pastor removed in Baltimore

What would HL Mencken say?

Baltimore’s new Roman Catholic archbishop removed a priest who was pastor of three South Baltimore parishes for offenses that include officiating at a funeral Mass with an Episcopal priest, which violates canon law.

Thus the Baltimore Sun.

Archbishop Edwin F. O’Brien personally ordered the Rev. Ray Martin, who has led the Catholic Community of South Baltimore for five years, to resign from the three churches and sign a statement yesterday apologizing for “bringing scandal to the church.”

The bereaved had invited the Episcopal priest.  Martin had been in hot water for a while, having

“received advice and counsel on numerous occasions from the archdiocese, and he has repeatedly violated church teaching,” [archdiocesan spokesman Sean] Caine said. His major offense was not complying with hiring and screening policies, but he also allowed dogs in the sanctuary and did not show up for a baptism, Caine said.

He’s been given time to cool off, straighten up, fly right:

Martin, who has not been defrocked, said he has been barred from celebrating Mass publicly. He will go on an extended retreat and counseling at a monastery in Latrobe, Pa., he said.

It’s going to be a fun retreat, that’s sure.

==============

Later:

Reader D: First dogs — then Episcopalian priests — has he no shame, sir???

Blithe Sp response: In the words of the immortal Sandy, “Arf!”

Also: See latest Homiletic & Pastoral Review article on narcissism among liturgically innovative priests (not yet posted).  It’s actually all about ME, you see.

The article quotes Thomas Day, Why Catholics Can’t Sing, a 1991 book, in which Day picks up on the Happy Improviser who ends a beautiful liturgy by congratulating all who took part, spoiling the effect in his need to inject himself into the service.