More candor, this time from a newsman

Image representing New York Times as depicted ...
Where news comes laundered

Yes, we recognize the ploy, do we not?  It’s NYT man defecting to Huffington Post, where he can let his great thoughts all hang out:

[Peter] Goodman, who spent a decade at The Washington Post before his three years at the Times, says he will still rely on facts and not engage in “ranting.” And while he was happy at the newspaper, he says, he found he was engaged in “almost a process of laundering my own views, through the tried-and-true technique of dinging someone at some think tank to say what you want to tell the reader.”

Carefully chosen facts, at that.  But that’s what you do: find an approved think-tanker or academic and launder your views, which nonetheless get out there, if under the guise of objectivity.  The games newsies play!

What means this quango?

Satellite image of Great Britain and Northern ...
United Kingdom from very high up

What the heck is a quango?  Not having immediate access to Diarmaid (I remember my spelling with diary-maid without the y) MacCulloch (also a tricky one), who uses it in the 9/10/10 Times Lit Supplement as something “set up” to do something.  A group.  It’s a collective noun, and a new one for me.

Oh yes.  What do it mean?

–noun, plural -gos.
(esp. in Great Britain) a semi-public advisory and administrative body supported by the government and having most of its members appointed by the government.
Origin:
1975–80; qu ( asi ) -a ( utonomous ) n ( on- ) g ( overnmental ) o ( rganization ) or qu ( asi ) -a ( utonomous ) n ( ational ) g ( overnmental ) o ( rganization )

says Dictionary.com.

It’s an acronym, what do you know?  Quasi autonomous (national) governmental organization.

Clever, these English people, though I’m not sure The MacCulloch would appreciate my calling him one of those.

Apologies, apologies

Official 109th congressional photo.
Dear supporters: Please forgive me.

Sun-Times:

Rep. Jackson: I did nothing wrong but ‘deeply sorry’ over ‘social acquaintance’

Chicago congressman vows to remain in office in wake of Sun-Times report regarding fund-raise

Sorry about what, if he did nothing wrong?  Ah, there’s the rub.  Sorry about the bad publicity, hence apology to “some of his supporters,” who share his sorrow about diminishing his political salability.

Which makes this a pro forma lie, typical of public-figure apologizing.