“Ouch” moment, but revelatory

Cass Sunstein Speaking at Harvard Law School
Sunstein miked

This explains a lot:

Cass Sunstein (the guy who Glenn has called the most dangerous man in America because of his regulatory powers) summed up the main issue conservatives have with progressives. Glenn plays the recently unearthed clip of Sunstein saying, “Some conservative legal thinkers like Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas think that the Constitution means what it originally meant.” [italics added]

The Glenn is the Beck man. Sunstein:

taught at the University of Chicago Law School, where he continues to teach as the Harry Kalven Visiting Professor. [He] is currently Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where he is on leave while working in the Obama administration.

His gummint job:

In September 2009, the Senate confirmed Professor Cass Sunstein to be Director of the White House OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs – the so-called “regulatory czar,” so named because all major proposed regulations go through the office for approval.

This Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs was

established in the 1980 Paperwork Reduction Act. OIRA is located within the Office of Management and Budget, which is an agency within the Executive Office of the President. It is staffed by both political appointees and career civil servants . . . . In addition to reviewing draft regulations under Executive Order 12866, OIRA reviews collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act, and also develops and oversees the implementation of government-wide policies in the areas of information technology, information policy, privacy, and statistical policy. [italics added]

Lot of power there, but his appointment “generated controversy among progressive legal scholars and environmentalists,” who feared him as anti-regulatory, says Wikipedia, citing The Center for Progressive Reform and The Wonk Room: Think Progress, who are probably impossible to please in these matters.

The Mullahs’ man

Virginia State Seal -- Improved
Image by Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com via Flickr: Heh

Uneasy lies the head:

Ahmadinejad, who wore the same tacky suit and shirt all week, took every precaution [during his New York week]. He never set foot in the lobby. Bulletproof glass was installed over room windows. When he left for meetings at the Iranian Mission, on Third Avenue, or the United Nations, he departed by an employee entrance, the path covered in a white tent — a veritable tunnel to his vehicle. His head was covered with a white cloth. No one saw him on the street.

The entourage dined in but not on room service. Meals — mostly lamb, shish kebabs, spiced ground meat and basmati rice — were prepared by a Persian restaurant and carried in by Secret Service agents.

Lest he be poisoned or someone approach and tell him,

“Sic semper tyrannis”

with the usual accompaniment — fusillade, knife thrust, thrown pineapple [#3].

Tweaking a charge

Image representing The Daily Caller as depicte...
Give this logo desgner a silver dollar
This fellow seems to be leading the retaliatory charge vs. Daily Caller, for its
thorougly bogus series of hit pieces alleging that Journolist represented some kind of shadowy liberal conspiracy to undermine our journalistic insitutions from within for the good of the Democratic Party.
Well I couldnt’ have said it better, except for the bogus and hit pieces part, and I’d change “alleging” to “demonstrating” and would refrain from “some kind of.”
But there will be more of this, I’m sure.

Selling religion

Pope Benedict XVI in St. Peter's Square, Rome ...
No, he's not running for office

Church historian and all-around religion and church observer Martin Marty is underwhelmed by popes’ homiletic effectiveness, as in this from his latest “Sightings,” a bi-weekly email-or-RSS-delivered essay (sign up for it here):

Pope Benedict XVI has expressed grave concern over the decline of church participation in Western Europe. His trip to the UK last week provided opportunities for him to address it. [However,] most commentators in religious and secular communications found almost nothing that he said or did which might help reverse the downward trends.

The fact that large crowds appeared at several of his appearances did not impress them; throngs line up for popes as celebrities. I’ve asked after each of Pope John Paul’s travels, which often drew masses of young people: did his Pope-mobiled words and gestures, eloquent though they be, lead any young man to enter the seminary ranks with intention to become ordained? Did mass attendance swell a month or a year later? Maybe the answer is yes, but it’s hard to find evidence.

To which I must retort with the apt and useful expression I heard from the late Chi Daily News man, Bill Mooney (see also here): “Compared to what?”  (Response to question, Do you love your wife, delivered with excellent dark humor.)

For one thing, popes are executives, and how many of them move crowds with oratory or showmanship?  Donald Trump, Lee Iacocca, and best of all, Robert Townsend, the Avis Car Rental exec who fired his p.r. people in the belief that his execs and managers are supposed to be able to explain things to media etc.  His ‘Up the Organization was about “How to Stop the Corporation from Stifling People and Strangling Profits.”  Who else?  Tell me.

They pay salesmen a lot in big companies, or little ones.  How about the guy whose commissions made him the highest paid in a medium-size operation, so that to keep him they had to offer him a piece of the action — a sort of upper-level profit-sharing?  Smart guy, smart owner.

In the religion business, where sales is called preaching or evangelism or proselytizing, Fulton Sheen was top of the list when a monsignor and even when a bishop.  But when he became an “ordinary” of a diocese, that is, its chief executive, he did not do near as well, resigning after three years.  It’s a gift to be simple, says the Shaker hymn, and it’s a gift to execute, another to orate.

In any case, what difference did Sheen make, or does any preacher, good or bad?  Well, you never know, as Marty says we don’t know what difference John Paul II made with his rock-star-like tours.  Sister Mary teaching first grade and her sister Lucy with little kids of her own to care for have more to say about what happens than pulpiteers or traveling evangelist, we suspect. Who the heck knows?

And now that I have finished orating in print, that may be Marty’s point anyway, or close to it.

==============

By the bye, I hear nice things about The Lutheran Hour, where Rev. Ken Klaus has given no small spiritual boost — Marty’s suspicious about “being spiritual”; he might expand on that position later on — to an all-out Catholic friend, though 6 a.m. Sunday (WGN-AM) is a challenge.

By the bye, I hear nice things about The Lutheran Hour, where Rev. Ken Klaus has given no small spiritual boost — Marty’s suspicious about “being spiritual”; he might expand on that position later on — to an all-out Catholic friend, though 6 a.m. Sunday (WGN-AM) is a challenge.

Jesuits go whole hog for non-reactionary reform

Jesuit Missionary
Immigrant Jesuit preaching to native-born

The Jesuit you see may be an immigration-reform enthusiast.  He certainly reports to a provincial who is.

(WASHINGTON) – On Friday, June 4, a letter signed by every Jesuit major superior in the United States was hand delivered to the White House and each individual Congressional office. Their canvassing effort seeks immediate and comprehensive immigration reform.  “With the new Arizona law, there is a real risk that life on our national borders will become subject to a patchwork of state responses; Congress is faced with both a constitutional and moral imperative to act,” said Jesuit Father Thomas H. Smolich, president of the Jesuit Conference of the United States.  “Despite what some reactionary politicians would have us believe,” Smolich added, “we can secure our borders in a way that does not cost us our humanity.”

What’s more, all you reactionary politicians can go somewhere else, and God have mercy on your miserable souls.

The intermingled state

Cover of "The Old Regime and the French R...
The book in question

How we are like France before the revolution:

“The number of persons having monetary dealings with it, subscribing to its loans, living on wages paid by it, and speculating in government-sponsored enterprises [!] had enormously increased.  Never before had the interests and fortunes of private individuals been so closely bound up with those of the State.  Thus the mismanagement of the State finances, which formerly had affected only the administration, now brought ruin to many homes.”

Alexis de Tocqueville said it in his The Old Regime and the French Revolution (Trans. Stuart Gilbert) (Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books, [1858] 1955), p. 179.

Cafe Hayek has it.

He has no shame

Bill Ayers speaks to audience members followin...
Ayers at Fla. State U., where all is forgiven

If not for Chris Kennedy and the other U. of Ill. at Chicago trustees who did not abstain from yesterday’s vote, unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers would have gotten the emeritus status he petitioned for:

Retired faculty ask for emeritus status, and it’s then signed off on by several levels of university administration before heading to trustees, [UIC spokesman Tom] Hardy said.  [Italics added]

In other words, with all his faults, they love him still at UIC.

As for faults, consider this from Kennedy after the vote:

Kennedy told the Chicago Sun-Times he and the board have not seen any signs of remorse from Ayers in the nearly 40 years since the dedication.

“There’s no evidence in any of his interviews or conversations that he regrets any of those actions . . .”

Egomaniacal professor.  No merit in him.  Deserves neither honor nor honorific.  Rather, he’s to be shunned.  But that won’t happen in the groves of academe.

Some Bad reviews for Pledge to America

Don Irvine with Award winner Michelle Malkin a...
Michelle M: she's also smart.

From Mike Fahy:  The Republican Pledge to America is 21 pages; the Contract with America was 869 words.

David Frum at Frum Forum — “The Pledge to America is a repudiation of the central, foundational idea behind the Tea Party. Tea Party activists have been claiming all year that there exists in the United States a potential voting majority for radically more limited government. The Republican Pledge to America declares: Sorry, we don’t believe that.”

RedState — The Pledge to America is “milquetoast rhetorical flourishes in search of unanimity among House Republicans because the House GOP does not have the fortitude to lead boldly in opposition to Barack Obama.”Club for Growth — The GOP Pledge to America is “so milquetoast that it proves to me that these guys just aren’t ready to lead.”

Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin — “It’s a real shame that the Constitution has to be re-branded once in a while – I kind of like the original.”

Hot Air — “Missing from the list of key agenda items — nothing on cultural issues. [Only] one line, buried at the end of the preamble on page one, and according to sources, even that was only added at the very last minute after Mike Pence objected.”

American Spectator — “Republicans have learned nothing from their time in the wilderness. The House Republicans are interested in attaining and then maintaining power, and not concerned with advancing the cause of limited government at a make-or-break moment in American history.”

Reader D:  Did someone expect more than half a loaf by these leftover Republicans and RINOS? It’s a first step. Get the new breed to Washington and tweak it properly. Right now it’s a start.

I think it’s also telling news from Jim DeMint that the Good Old Boys let the “Republican” who lost to Joe Miller in Alaska retain her clout:

Senate Republicans held a closed-door meeting yesterday afternoon to elect someone to replace Senator Murkowski as the top Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Or so we thought.

Rather than taking away Murkowski’s leadership position on the committee, Senate Republicans decided to let her keep it. One senator after another stood up to argue in favor of protecting her place on the committee — a position she will no doubt use in her campaign against Joe Miller, the conservative Republican nominee.

So what can we expect from most of what we have on the Hill today?

Blithe Sp: The Murkowski ploy is more telling than the Pledge, I think, as does D, I’m sure.