Monsignor William Lynn, who served as the secretary for clergy [vicar for priests] . . . under then-Philadelphia Archbishop Anthony Bevilacqua, was charged with two counts of endangering the welfare of a child in connection with . . . alleged assaults, Williams said.
From 1992 until 2004, Lynn was responsible for investigating reports that priests had sexually abused children, the district attorney’s office said.
The grand jury found that Lynn, 60, endangered children, including the alleged victims of those charged last week, by knowingly allowing dangerous priests to continue in the ministry in roles in which they had access to kids.
Allen explains:
“This is apparently the first time that a Catholic leader has been charged criminally for the cover-up as opposed to the abuse itself,” he said. “It sends a shot across the bow for bishops and other diocesan officials in other parts of the country, who have to wonder now if they’ve got criminal exposure, too.”
Wed. Journal reported a drop in OP’s black population, and readers weighed in. Is there a more vocal village in the world?
Violet Aura starts it off, mildly enough:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:23 PM: Hmm…I don’t know what to make of these numbers. I look around and see (what appears to be) higher numbers of Black students at OPRF [high school than] when I attended. Likewise, just walking down the street I see many Blacks in Downtown OP. It could be that some of them don’t actually reside in OP; I don’t know. But census numbers may not count those who are living with relatives.
Tom Scharre takes a certain amount of issue with her, also mildly enough, if not crystal clearly:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:40 PM: I am old enough to have often heard -and occasionally used- the socially acceptable default disclaimer:”I don’t care if you’re white, black, yellow or green…” But, forgive me Lord, I am beginning to be the teensiest bit concerned if you’re “violet.”
OPer then takes the gloves off, finding his inner fascist along the way:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:42 PM: Violet, racists such as yourself are not only always seeing scary Blacks everywhere they go, but typically cannot distinguish between self-reported anecdote and actual evidence. Please, WJ, again would you consider limiting the participation of racists like VA? They only pollute the discussion, and make OP appear more racist than it truly is. [Italics mine]
Benita from Oak Park expands on the theme, with a right, then a left, then a blow to the midsection:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:49 PM: So “Violet Aura”, could it be that black people who don’t actually live in OP could still work, shop, dine, visit and park here (and thank you to them – we need the business and parking revenue!) which could be why you see so many more in downtown OP? And just how long ago were you attending OPRF [High]? And by not counting residents who are “living with relatives”? My husband and I live in our Oak Park home with our kids. We’re all related, a.k.a “relatives.” Is that what you mean?!
Long-time Oak Park Resident from Oak Park IL brings in neighboring, affluent River Forest and Trader Joe’s (!):
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:49 PM: Violet, perhaps you only NOTICE the blacks (for whatever reason). Having read many of your postings [which I have not, btw], you seem to have a distinct fascination with blacks. Looking around downtown Oak Park would not be the most credible way to refute the census facts. Dare I say some River Foresters might happen over to our downtown area, or residents of many other neighboring villages might stumble to our Trader Joe’s or Lake Theatre? What isn’t surprising is that you were the first to comment. [Will have to
read Violet more often.]
Tibbis
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:01 PM: Violet, my g/f and I moved to Oak Park and purchased a home because of the diversity and open- mindedness of the Oak Park community. My g/f is from NYC and did not like Chicago because people are so racist, closed minded, ect. Oak Park is one of the few communities around that supports diversity. I am proud to live here, how about you? Furthermore, lifes too short to hate anyone. Hatred for others is hatred for yourself. [Good
point!]]
Tom Scharre again, again mildly, tho cherishing animus twd Violet:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:06 PM: @OPer: freedom of speech for everyone – even the violet among us.
Violet (finally) begins her rebuttal:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:08 PM: Wow! Thank you all for such reactionary posts. Everyone just tripping over each other to call me names, eh? Reread my post. I am simply stating my observations versus what the report states. Not once did I express dismay at seeming to see more Blacks in the area; YOU added your subjective conditioned Pavlovian response to my post! Without going into specifics, I am of mixed ethnicity. The ONLY PLACE where I was ever called a slur was in my lovely hometown of Oak Park! I look ETHNIC, not White! [Bravo!]
Mustaine has the answer:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:10 PM: Who cares what Violet thinks?????????
Violet, in no way to be shushed, doubles down:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:11 PM: As to my looks, I actually recently had an Oak Parker ask me where I was “from.” When I said OP, he said “No, originally.” I asked him if I had an accent because I was baffled by such a question (I was born in Chicago and grew up in OP.). He stated that someone as “exotic-looking” as I must have been born somewhere else! I guess only blonde-haired, blue-eyed people are native to USA! I don’t think like this. I happen to be interested [in] sociology and race issues. YOU all need to check yourselves!
kathryn jonas from oak park has a question that ranges beyond Violet:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:11 PM: Has it occurred to the Wednesday Journal that African Americans may move out of Oak Park for reasons other than “affordability”? Such as the fact that Oak Park may not be as welcoming as the official PR would suggest? The lack of black representation on the Village Board, citizens commissions, school boards, park board and township board should raise questions about the lack of diversity in these areas. I know many white people who have moved out of Oak Park because it is not affordable.
More from Violet, who clearly is having a good time with it all:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:15 PM: And one more thing–all this PC crap hasn’t changed a damn thing. Ever see online comments and all the racism? You cannot legislate racial tolerance. The only way to change hearts and minds is to have people live next to one another and see how similar they are. But freaking out because I notice people’s race/ethnicity is self-deluding. You [notice], too. You just think it’s taboo to admit it. It’s hardwired into us to look at people’s appearances. The real test is not to treat people differently.
Puzzled from Oak Park has a curve ball:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:23 PM: Why can the black population be made public but the black criminals can not be made public? [Uh-oh]
Daniel Lauber has “the actual figures” that supply the compared-to-what? info missing from the story:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:29 PM:The proportion of whites in Oak Park fell from 71.9% in 2000 to 70.2% in 2010 and blacks from 23.5% to 22.5%. Meanwhile Asians increased from 0.01% to 5% and Hispanics from 4% to 6.8%.
He raises another point, about income as determinant:
The real question is what the proportions would be in a free housing market where income determines where you live — something we can’t calculate until household income by race figures are released in 2012.
Violet picks up on this new train, ruminating on changes yet to come:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:40 PM: The thing that I wonder about, regarding OP’s demographics, is what is going to happen three, five years down the line when you have these outrageously high tax rates and devalued houses? Isn’t the tax rate supposed to mirror the property’s value? How can social workers and teachers afford to live in OP with such ridiculous charges? So I am thinking that we will see more and more people moving in who may not share the values and perspective of the middle-class. . . . .
J.G. Morales LOL@ Violet, having heard “the exotic thing” all his life:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:40 PM: . . . and so has anyone else who looks “exotic”. White, black, latino, asian, middle eastern have all asked where we’re from. I find it very ironic that you mention having these problems in Oak Park. I’ve stayed here because these things happen FAR LESS often in Oak Park. Never once a racial slur. As far as they know, the only “race” my children have is “American” and it’s a beautiful thing! Only in Oak Park.:-) [Go,
J.G.!]
Edye from River Forest picks up on the black-perp question asked 35 minutes earlier:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:58 PM: Puzzled from Oak Park: You asked an interesting question: “Why can the black population be made public but the black criminals can not be made public?” Why not say the same for the white criminals? [Huh?] Not that I care, but there is such a thing. My family is one of quite a few black families who moved out of Oak Park – not because of “affordability” But because we found homes better suited for us in… River Forest. [Ha!]
Meta-comment: Police reports are color-blind. Crime is colorless. School programs, on the other hand, to take one example, are color-conscious to the Nth degree. Why is that?
Violet on slurs in ’80s:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:58 PM: Well, I just have my own experiences to go by. And the slur was directed at me by guys that I probably went to school with. This is not recent at all. This occurred in the mid-’80s. So I suspect that times have changed quite a bit. OP is full of educated people and that is what helps things. Actually, a lot of the clashing that people have is more based upon socioeconomic class (or perceptions of such) than actual race/ethnicity.
Violet on River Forest as “status thing”:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 07:28 PM: @Edye: Just curious: what is so special about the housing stock in RF that you could not find in OP? Please tell me that this is not a status thing! I can’t stand when I tell people where I live (RF) and they start oohing and ahhing and I’m like “Um, no. I rent an apt.” The whole snobbery angle is so tired for me. I am not accusing you of such, however, but you seemed to imply that you could not find anything suitable in OP and that is hard to believe.
J.G. Morales back at her on slur business etc.:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 08:27 PM: IDK [I don’t know?], Violet. You’re mentioning the evil racist deeds of Oak Parkers as some slam on OP? I don’t really get it. I do agree, however, that socio-economic background seems to be more important than race. Also, I find this article interesting because I too have noticed more blacks in the neighborhood. From 2 to 6 families on my block. Same for Latinos. Yet, I don’t really understand why this is news.
And a few minutes later, J.G. Morales again, with what were closing remarks when I closed down last night:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 08:34 PM: Race seems to be such a confusing issue in this country. We talk about equality and diversity and equal opportunity all while keeping tabs and differentiating. I don’t think we’re going to get rid of racial problems by making a huge deal about race.
The Archdiocese of Omaha announced Friday it is closing St. Peter Claver Cristo Rey High School at the end of the academic year due to the schools $7 million debt, large operating deficits, an ongoing need for outside financial support and a soft economy.
It’s a first, I think. Chicago area has three Cristo Rey-model schools, all doing fine. Would be a shame if that marvelous experiment failed. In fact, experiment is not right. The schools have been around long enough to be considered settled programs. But hard times lie ahead, and as profits decline, non-profits are sure to suffer.
First you sell the car, then the garage, then the house, then the wife (or husband), then the kids. It’s how you stay afloat.
The city’s reliance on one-time revenues, rather than recurring revenue streams like taxes, exploded, with such funding growing to 17.6% of revenues in the city’s main operating fund in fiscal 2011, up from 5.6% just four years earlier.
Folklore grinds out the grains of truth that are found in such notions [as]: If an Irishman is given a choice of water or whisky, the water will go untouched.
With Pope Benedict XVIs latest plans for time traveling the church back to another era, we recall another claim: If a German is offered a choice between justice and good order, hell take the good order any day.
That may not apply to all Germans, but it certainly does to the present pope who is currently devoting a lot of time to battling what he terms relativism and to bolstering his Reform of the Reform, a.k.a., turning Vatican II back into Vatican I.
He’s maybe been “listening to too much Wagner,” says K, who is having a little ethnic fun here, I would like to think. But it fails from several standpoints, one of which occurs right off.
The Rahner brothers, especially Karl, both SJ, might have found folkloric grains of truth in the above — which admittedly may not apply to all Germans (really?) — after, say, a stein or two of Bavaria’s best. But my guess is they stir uncomfortably in their graves when they hear it helps to be German if you intend to reform, i.e. reverse, reform.
There’s more. The pope is or appears “willing to turn worship into a well planned war game by deploying believers as if they were charged to march, salute, and, of course, pray and obey,” says Kennedy, warming to his task.
The pope’s heritage makes him feel more comfortable if you remove all of the doubt, mistakes, and spontaneity from life as if that would remove sin. He apparently wants to do the same with worship that, as a human activity, is bound to express the incompleteness, the ever unfinished edges, the heartbreak and the unfulfilled hopes, that, along with their simple joy and gratitude, human beings express in their prayer lives.
Heritage, shmeritage. Spend too much time in the mists of Glocca Mora, and the fairies will get you if you don’t watch out.
This pope intends to find mystery in “phrases minted like coins of Bismarck’s empire, each one perfect, each one the same, and not one of them worth anything today.”
(POSTED: 2/10/11) Like the TV detective Monk, I have a gift that is also a curse: I pay very close attention at Mass. So when the priest veers away from the approved text, I hear it and fume. Used to fume. Now I go into my free-fly zone. Frequently.
In this zone, I woolgather, daydream, write columns for Chicago Catholic News dot calm, etc. This means that one minute I’m saying “Lord hear our prayer” with the other faithful, next minute that I know about, I am rising for the Our Father. Awful, I know. Can only say I’m working on it.
The paying close attention thing is a bigger problem. The priest subs out “His” for “God’s,” “disciples” for “friends,” “Almighty God” for “Almighty Father,” etc. Two of these reduce masculine references, sparing feminist sensibilities. The other is apparently meant to de-emphasize levels of authority in favor of intimacy. Irritating, . . . . more more more at Chicago Catholic News . . .
Oprah called on President Obama’s critics on Friday to show some level of respect.
“I feel that everybody has a learning curve, and I feel that the reason why I was willing to step out for him was because I believed in his integrity and I believed in his heart,” the influential TV host said on MSNBCs Morning Joe in Chicago.
Of the negative mood of the country, Oprah added, I think everybody complaining ought to try it for once.
She said the presidency is a position that holds a sense of authority and governance over us all, and that even if youre not in support of his policies, there needs to be a certain level of respect.
Mitsubishi Montero SUV, as was driven by hitter and runner. (From M.Peinado's photostream)
Trib Breaking News lags behind home-delivery hard copy coverage of last night’s hit & run by SUV driver running red light, sending two female pedestrians, aged 53 and 71, to the hospital. In the Loop!
Comments say it:
* Mawitz at 9:40 PM February 10, 2011: chicago tribune has more information [i.e. home-delivery etc. as
above]:
A Sauk Village woman confirmed Thursday that her daughter owns the SUV, but she said the daughter had lent the vehicle to her brother since November so he could commute to work.
2nd comment presses issue further:
* kellygirl1 at 5:43 PM February 10, 2011: If they have the license number, how can they not know who the owner of the car is?
Hard copy has the #. (Separate on-line story adds missing hard-c info) Why not give the name? It would help find the reckless driver.
Being a Democrat means never having to resign because of a scandal, says The Other McCain:
Let me explain something: If you want to be a member of Congress and screw around, join the Democratic Party. You can screw around all you want and no problem, if youre a Democrat. But you cant do that and be a Republican member of Congress.
It’s for considering. Thing is, Republicans claim virtue, Dems don’t bother: it wouldn’t sell.
Another, indisputable, point:
UPDATE: Fastest scandal ever! The Internet not only makes it easier for cheaters to cheat, it makes it easier for cheaters to get caught, and the rapidity with which the damning evidence becomes public tends to accelerate the resignation.
Now you see them, now you don’t. It’s also the role of shame, a most useful reaction as regards the common good. Let there be shame! It saves us a lot of trouble.
And expediency, of course. Where would we be without that?
(HT the extremely good “Morning Jolt,” by the top-of-the-line Jim Geraghty, part of the National Review Online stable. Sign up here. You won’t regret it.)
Blithe Spirit 