And makes a good case for getting along with opponents in a number of doctrinal battles. But his cases each call for broad-mindedness, not just loving the person right or wrong, which broad-m. can look a lot like giving away the store.
It’s one thing to recognize the opponent as a child of God, for instance, another to say he or she may be right. If it’s tension you are willing to undergo, this friendliness with your opponent right or wrong provides more than enough.
So what else is new?
Blithe Spirit 