Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich: ‘We have bigger agenda than to be distracted by church sex abuse scandal’

Like climate change or plastic in the ocean?

“I’m hurting, I can’t sleep, I’m sick,” the seminarian told Cupich during an Aug. 29 gathering at which the cardinal spoke to about 200 future priests enrolled at the seminary, according to another person who was there and spoke with the Chicago Sun-Times but asked not to be identified.

The seminarian told Cupich he was a young boy during the last scandal, in the early 2000s — amid a renewed wave of child-rape allegations against priests and cover-ups by their bishop bosses — and “thought this was over,” that the bishops had done their jobs.

Cupich thanked the man for speaking up and said he, too, was sick over the situation.

Minutes later, though, the cardinal said something that struck some of the seminarians as “tone-deaf.”

“I feel very much at peace at this moment. I am sleeping OK,” Cupich said, according to the person in attendance, a man studying to be a priest, who recalled that some fellow seminarians shook their heads in “disbelief.”

Not exactly consistent.

The source said Cupich also told the group that, while the church’s “agenda” certainly involves protecting kids from harm, “we have a bigger agenda than to be distracted by all of this,” including helping the homeless and sick.

That account was confirmed by other sources, including another seminarian also present at the gathering.

One of them said he decided to speak with the Sun-Times because so many Catholics “are hurting,” the cardinal’s remarks were so “non-pastoral,” and “the people of God need to know that their seminarians care” and “aren’t going to repeat the mistakes of the past — not only not repeat them but have them cleaned up.”

He’s losing them, it seems.

More about this q&a session at Mundelein (IL) seminary at Chicago Sun-Times.

Tear Down this Papal Wall of Silence

See something, say something, Francis. You’ll feel better if you do.

Many international leaders, including Pope Francis, have frequently commented on walls. In February, 2017, Pope Francis told the general audience in St. Peter’s square, “In the social and civil context as well, I appeal not to create walls but to build bridges,” On March 18, 2017, he tweeted “I invite you not to build walls but bridges, to conquer evil with good, offence with forgiveness, to live in peace with everyone.”

While Pope Francis is absolutely correct, it seems that he should follow his own advice.

Makes sense to me. Why won’t he talk about the Vigano accusations, made not by a pundit going on news reports but by a veteran Vatican hand with nothing to gain who cites detailed incidents in which Francis himself is involved?

Instead, in not only the Vigano case,

he has been a master builder of an invisible wall which separates him from much of the Catholic Church.

Unlike the brick and mortar wall surrounding Vatican City, Francis’s wall consists of ambiguity, inconsistency, passive-aggressiveness, and silence. He can be very clear on some matters, but when it comes to certain topics, he becomes vague, briefly stepping into the light, before slipping back into the shadows.

His answers are typically in the form of cryptic rebukes, often through his press office or one of his close advisors. On certain issues his message is hazy and he becomes aloof and inconsistent when asked for clarification.

He can even become living satire, such as his recent declaration that plastic in our oceans is an “emergency,” as if environmentalists need support from the pope, as he ignores a scandal in the Church which he himself could resolve with immediate and certain results.

It’s so obviously a diversionary tactic as to question if he’s losing his touch with  what sells with the hoi polloi.

more more more here: Crisis Magazine

The Hunting of the Viganò II

The long arm of The Francis:

Church Militant has a fascinating story, the stuff of novels.

Vatican officials are on the hunt for Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò.

According to sources within the Vatican, the Secretariat of State of the Holy See — under the direction of Pietro Cardinal Parolin [see below] — has communicated an instruction to its internal and external security services to use its “intelligence resources” to locate the physical whereabouts of Abp. Viganò.

This request has been communicated not only in order to prevent more unpredictable damage to the image of Pope Francis and the Holy See on the world stage, but also to “prepare the terrain” for the former apostolic nuncio-turned-whistleblower to be prosecuted for alleged multiple crimes against Vatican and Church law.

He who says nothing and calls for silence goes after the offender, or sends his people. The Dictator Pope.

And Pietro Parolin, secretary of state, is the same who in that capacity protected his post and perquisites enjoyed by fellow cardinals by shutting down the financial audit of the curia in 2016.

An old Roman hand, you might say, fully in the tradition of the “Italian princely courts.”

THE HUNT FOR VIGANÒ: VATICAN SPIES TRACKING WHISTLEBLOWER

Who says the Vatican is corrupt and inefficient? This shows how efficient they can be.

According to sources within the Vatican, the Secretariat of State of the Holy See — under the direction of Pietro Cardinal Parolin — has communicated an instruction to its internal and external security services to use its “intelligence resources” to locate the physical whereabouts of Abp. Viganò.

This request has been communicated not only in order to prevent more unpredictable damage to the image of Pope Francis and the Holy See on the world stage, but also to “prepare the terrain” for the former apostolic nuncio-turned-whistleblower to be prosecuted for alleged multiple crimes against Vatican and Church law.

They just have to be motivated.

Cardinal McCarrick: Everybody Knew . . .

. . . but kept silent.

Remember how, after Harvey Weinstein was busted as a serial sexual abuser, it emerged that a whole lot of people knew this about Weinstein, but never said anything about it? The same thing is true about Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, who was outed today (by the Catholic Church) as having sexually abused a minor years ago.

I had never heard that McCarrick abused minors, but I heard from many sources that he  would go after seminarians. He had a habit of inviting them to his beach house, and always inviting one more young man than there was bed space for. The unlucky mark had to bunk with the Archbishop, who loved to snuggle.

Here are excerpts from an “open letter” to Pope Benedict XVI, written a decade ago by the sociologist Richard Sipe, a former Benedictine monk who specializes in studying the sexual behavior of Catholic priests:

more more more via The American Conservative

Fellow here couldn’t learn language of corporate life . . .

Got out while the getting was good.

I became disenchanted with corporate life. Or rather, perhaps, I could not acquire adequate proficiency in the new corporate turn of phrase.

What I called a spade had now become “an upward-downward, dynamic and portable, soil management tool.”

In fact the book “Your Daily Shakespeare” is my answer to an Orwellian language I could not learn.

How not to approve this departure from the humdrum?

Plus, let us now praise this man and his work.

Link: http://yourdailyshakespeare.com/about-the-author+

— Portland OR-based, by the way —

Strong Economy Drove Wages Higher in August as Hiring Heats Up . . .

. . . U.S. nonfarm payrolls expanded by 201,000, while private-sector hourly wages grew 2.9% from a year earlier.

So much for Nancy Pelosi’s comment on employees’ bonuses as improving their lives,

Pelosi, Jan. 11: In terms of the bonus that corporate America received versus the crumbs that they are giving to workers to kind of put the schmooze on is so pathetic. It’s so pathetic. And I would hope that with their big advantage of bringing money home at a very low rate, that they would invest in infrastructure and things. But our experience has been that they will do dividends. They will do stock buy-backs and things like that. I think it’s insignificant.

Recalling the reply of a former Jesuit colleague to my calling his argument “irrelevant — “You’re irrelevant,” he sputtered, which I still chuckle at — I could reply to her, “Pathetic? You’re pathetic.”

Kidding, of course.

“On the square,” my father used to say, shrewdly.