Newsalert: Liz Harrington: Health Care is not a Fundamental Right

https://nalert.blogspot.com/2017/05/liz-harrington-health-care-is-not.html

​Some interesting things said here.

From Wash Free Beacon woman on not a right: Constitution is about rights not to be treated, not what’s to be provided.

From Fox Business host: Reminds us of FDR’s "four freedoms" — from want, etc., a basically socialistic position ballyhooed in my childhood (1930s, 40s) as a New Deal plank. Nothing there about right not to be treated by the government.

Basic issues here, basic point of difference.​

How’s this for encouraging? Full employment, anyone?

​America (getting) great again:​

Many economists say the US is now at or near “full employment,” meaning the unemployment rate won’t go down significantly more. It’s a state, where employers have to pay up to hire, because it becomes hard to find workers. That’s why wage growth is expected to pick up.

​And consider that that says for (a) the midterms and (b) the quadrennial, i.e. Trump in 2020.

(I am constrained to ask, however, as I did during the previous admin, what of those disappeared from the labor force?)

Media bias unmasked!

Spotting the gorilla in the news room, after all these years! What. Do. You. Know.

The answer to the press’ myopia lies elsewhere, and nobody has produced a better argument for how the national media missed the Trump story than FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver, who pointed out that the ideological clustering in top newsrooms led to groupthink.

“As of 2013, only 7 percent of [journalists] identified as Republicans,” Silver wrote in March, chiding the press for its political homogeneity.

Just after the election, presidential strategist Steve Bannon savaged the press on the same point but with a heartier vocabulary. “The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what’s wrong with this country,” Bannon said. “It’s just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no fucking idea what’s going on.”

Hand it to and , the first of whom ran a very good Headlines (?) report at Slate many years ago — was laid off in 2011, picked up by Reuters, then by Politico in 2015 — for laying it all out, somehow disposing of the bias claim as such while supplying for it ample evidence.

So what? They put it to their fellows as a major problem and even suggest solutions. He’s no Steve Bannon, of course, but you know? That’s all right.

Addendum: Years ago, I called it the lemming problem: Newsies for most part followed their leaders in re: national news. Second (and third and fourth etc.) City syndrome. Once, through possibly unethical subterfuge, a Detroiter and I scooped the NY Times — by two hours, enough to find the city editor waving the wire copy as I got back from wherever, not in Chicago.  Which said more about us as a group than me as enterprising.

In expose-style Sun-Times story about private-server emails to the Chicago mayor is complaint by developer about a system “riddled with rules and apathy . . . “

The emailer was Robert Judelson, of JMB Realty, who bewailed “costly and time-consuming” regulations which “play havoc with financial results and make it ever more difficult to provide needed housing for. . . new folks [who might be] moving to the city.”

Developers, Judelson said, “are struggling more than ever to bring projects to . . . completion,” but “the system is riddled with rules and apathy and it is costing the city a fortune.”

Shit. The culture of City Hall. Judelson should write a guest column about it, or the mayor should call him and other developers in for advice about what to do about a suffocating bureaucracy.

Alone among the emailers cited in the story, Judelson speaks for a key constituency for the city that works, and not a pet project, by the way.