Making sure you are not misunderstood

Wondering about the situation or plight of ecumenism in these perilous days, Martin Marty as expected touches all bases, including the objection to his worried tone that I had right off, as he heard from a friend,

“What are Christians in mainline and moderate and (gulp!) liberal styles griping about. They won!”

I note the “gulp!” insertion.  It’s the obligatory understated distancing himself from this concern or at least the “liberal” part.  It’s what you do when giving heed to those who are not like him and his followers, lest anyone think he’s weakening on the point.  Lots of people do this.  I have.

Sobriquets and aphorisms for our troubled era

* Elena “I refuse to recuse” Kagan: the SC justice who argued for Obamacare as solicitor general but sits to declare its consitutionality.

* Words that went viral: #1 of a series, “guys,” for people of any age and gender or role (place?) in society.

* Convenient classification: There are two kinds of people men, those who wear their hats at the dinner table, out or at home, not at a picnic or beach, and those who do not.

Bonus:

Kurt Vonnegut Jr. in Times Lit Supplement 3/9/12 (subscription required):

* His Mother Night is his “funniest” book, says reviewer Thomas Meaney.

* Writing as he did when he did about WW2, he “faced the shibboleth of the Good War” as in the novels and books by Herman Wouk, James Michener, and Andy Rooney.  Not so the grim accounts by Robert Stone, Michael Herr, Tim O’Brien et al.

* Post-Slaughterhouse Five, in which he reached his apogee, he catered to semi-cultists, gave into “posturizing,” says Meaney, who sells him persuasively as a world-class ironist, never deviating in his accounts of the horrors of war, slipping into a “sentimental bog,” as O’Brien does in The Things They Carried.

He did that after Slaughterhouse, when “he began to recycle his gimmicks and [his] sardonic shell started to crack.”

As V. would say, so it goes.

Catholic religious educators rock to ’80s sound

At Los Angeles convention, the “We are the worled” sound.

[The] music is dated, while chants written a millennium prior are not. The reason is: the earlier music was not ephemeral. It was not written to satisfy a perceived (usually hopelessly outdated) current theological or musical trend, but to give expression to the deep faith that can truly sustain a Christian.

The price of being with it.

the words too, sound exactly like We Are the World, which, with admirable clarity, expresses secular humanism.

Sung by all-stars.

The lyrics.