A tale of the city

Not quite Chappaquiddick, but it took Sun-Times’ asking for records on the case, which is seven years old.  Investigation closed, they hear.
 
Not enough, say two (black) alder-people.
 
Daley nephew six-three, 230 lbs., other guy five-five, 140.  Punched in heat of moment?  Unintended consequences?
Koschman<————–  Decased five-fiver
Friends of the deceased offer to be lie-detected, but not friends of the nephew, who won’t talk at all.  Another witness, one of two bystanders, has a nephew-friendly recollection, thinks he knows nephew from attending high school in Wilmette.  That is Loyola Academy, of course.  No Daley nephew is going to New Trier, which is Rahm E’s alma mater, by the way.
 
The nephew and one friend fled the scene, leaving two McCarthys behind. 
 
Did the little guy rush the nephew’s friend in the wake of bump followed by harsh words?  Or did he only stride toward him, saying something, maybe mouthing off?
 
Division & Dearborn, three in the morning.  Not quite Chappaquiddick, but a story apparently of political connection in Chicago, where winks and nods do very nicely, thank you.

Clash of the Chicago titans

Chicago alder-people are one happy family.  They vote for each other’s projects, feel a “commitment to each other.”  Thus the chairman of their black caucus.  Room for others in your fam, Alderman?

Along comes Rahm. “Rahm don’t want trouble,” says Ald. Walter Burnett.  He’s “smart enough” to know that.  “Playing . . . games and taking it on the chin.  It is what is what it is.”  Now and ever shall be.

Ald. Eddie Burke, however, has more money in the bank — $8 mill vs. Rahm’s $2 mill.  Battle brewing.

Dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls<—————————— Burke

What, he worry?

Sex on campus, after class

What this country needs is more thoughtful discussion of controversial topics.  Take that sex demo at Northwestern U. 
“We had kind of a duty, I think, to educate these students in a functional and effective way. Psychology students… and my other reason for doing this– if these were going to be psychologists then they have a need to know about this esoteric knowledge that could help someone in the future,” said [Jim] Marcus [male member of the demo team].
John Michael Bailey, the professor in question, is for thoughtful discussion, as above.  He considers it “a cornerstone of learning.”
 
For one student:
“It reminded me of how comfortable you can be with your body because she [the female member] was unfazed,” said Sam Hazlett, Northwestern student.
At first NU, anonymously thru a spokesman, was not fazed either.  Then alums and others chimed in, and so did the president, finally:

On Thursday in a second statement, the university’s president said he was “disappointed” and “disturbed.”

“It represented extremely poor judgment on the part of our faculty member,” said President Morton Schapiro. “I simply do not believe this was appropriate, necessary or in keeping with Northwestern University’s academic mission.”

In addition [besides], outraged parents and alumni [had] been calling the school.

It’s the joy of sex, mechanically produced.  Who said anything about love?

Later: The prof apologized.

Teddy K’s idea of fun

Kennedy's official Senate portrait in the 1990s
That night in Chile!

In ’61, Ted Kennedy dropped in on Chile as part of his duties (?!) as Assistant District Attorney of Suffolk County and for relaxation became a whoremaster for a night:

While Kennedy was in Santiago he made arrangements to rent a brothel for an entire night. Kennedy allegedly invited one of the Embassy chauffeurs to participate in the night’s activities.

Everywhere he went, the angry young men (and women), leftists all, were his chief interest otherwise.  For political discussion.

Wow. Those guys were afflicted, I’d say. I mean the Kennedy brothers. The family tried to block this info but failed.

Weekend homebodies

Byron York on the case of the missing Dems.  Read from bottom up, of course, and thank you, Twitter!:

 

 

 

Warrants are not criminal or civil, but police can detain lawmakers and return them to the Capitol if they’re spotted in Wisconsin.
»
 

 

 

‘They will now have warrants on them that if they come back into the state at all, law enforcement will have authority to detain them.’
»
 

 

 

‘We know that certain senators have been coming back on weekends and spending time with their families,’ says GOP Sen. Hopper.
»
 

 

 

Wisconsin GOP: Fugitive Dems are making secret visits home.

Farrakhan out a billion, madder ‘n hell

Father Pfleger’s best friend Farrakhan has made an important list.  He is now one of the “World’s Top Ten Gaddafi Toads,” per Walter Russell Mead, who puts him at #6 position, between Tony Blair and Silvio Berlusconi.

Gaddafi toad <— A real toad

Mead:

Like the ever-faithful Hugo Chavez, Louis Farrakhan is a Gaddafi loyalist who loves true and loves long.  Bitterly disappointed when the Clinton administration blocked the transfer of $1 billion of money looted from the hapless Libyan populace to the Nation of Islam back in 1996 (and, worse, blocked the $250,000 honorarium promised to Minister Farrakhan), Farrakhan is still calling Gaddafi a friend, and predicting that America is on the verge of a Libya style uprising.  Sure, Gaddafi has his critics, says Farrakhan, but what leader can count on 100% support?

Distinguished company.  Father Pfleger must be proud.

Elsewhere in the news, in the Jerusalem Post in fact, which has a very big dog in this fight, are a couple of stories that predate Farrakhan’s more recent defense of Gaddafi in Chicago.

Last June, he fingered Jews as black people’s “worst enemy.” 

And in March of ’09, again in Chicago, he fingered Israelis as “liars, thieves, murderers” who have “taken the position of God” and are out to “kill everybody.”

He has a way with words, to be sure.  Still, what does Fr. Pfleger see in him?  What need does he fill.  Father figure?  Hard to figure.

Farrakhan on the Jews

Current Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
What a friend he has in Muammar

There he goes again:

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan said on Tuesday that Jews and Zionists are trying to push the US into war and that Zionists dominate the US government and banks.

Farrakhan, 77, made the comments at the Nation of Islams annual meeting near Chicago.

His friend Muammar:

President Obama, Farrakhan said, if you allow the Zionists to push you, to mount a military offensive against Gaddafi and you go in and kill him and his sons, as you did with Saddam Hussein and his sons… Im warning you this is a Libyan problem, let the Libyans solve their problem among themselves.

Farrakhan called Muammar Gaddafi my brother and my friend.

It’s a matter of religious belief:

Some of you think that Im just somebody whos got something out for the Jewish people, Farrakhan said. Youre stupid.

Do you think I would waste my time if I did not think it was important for you to know Satan? My job is to pull the cover off of Satan so that he will never deceive you and the people of the world again.

Anti-Defamation League response:

ADL National Director Abe Foxman said in response that, Anti-Semitism has suffused the Nation of Islams message, and Farrakhan is the standard bearer and bigot in chief… Perhaps what’s more disturbing is that despite his anti-Semitic rants, he has not been made a pariah in his own community. What does it take for him to stop being a pied piper of hatred?

For starters, Fr. Michael Pfleger could disown him. Won’t happen, of course. What a reflection on Pfleger is his friendship with and endorsement of Farrakhan, including his anti-semitism. What a disgrace.

Public unions: a way to buy jobs

Rev. Robert Sirico quotes John Paul II in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:
“Unions do not have the character of political parties struggling for power; they should not be subjected to the decision of political parties or have too close links with them.”
 
Contrast that with what the Wisconsin bishops’ lobbyist said about what the bishops think about teachers’ and other public unions:
The bishops are merely reminding everybody of the teaching of the Church [about] the dignity of work and the appropriate place for unions without giving them carte blanche to have everything they want. [italics mine]
The dignity of work is not the point here.  
 
Fr. Sirico:
Generally speaking, the long history of unions has been bound up with the right of free association. So far as I can tell, the current practice of public-sector union organizing has little or nothing to do with this principle, so it is right and proper that Catholic social teaching should also recognize this.
Free association, a human right.  “But the driving force behind the budgetary move has nothing to do with human rights, unless one considers the rights of Wisconsin taxpayers,” says Sirico.  “It is nearly impossible for anyone to work for the public sector without being a member” and paying dues.
 
Teachers vs unions
Some do not like that idea.
But freedom of association has worked against unionization.  Unions could not bribe employers, but they could pay into campaign funds and get similar results from legislators and governors and presidents.  Unions became office-seekers’ and -holders’ financiers.  These politicos in turn had jobs to offer — public service jobs, where membership was not the point, dues were.
 
Sirico closes:
The bias toward unions in Catholic social teaching is rooted in a perception that unions fulfill certain moral conditions. When they fail to do so, the application of moral teaching can change. There is no a priori reason to back every union demand and no reason for Catholics to feel under any doctrinal obligation to do so.
As he said earlier in the column,
Just because something is called a union does not make it automatically good and moral. Essential considerations of justice and freedom must be in place.
Once in a Newspaper Guild meeting, I said we should support the delivery truck drivers if they had a good case and was accused of being a Jesuit.  Worst thing my union brother could think of at the moment, I guess.
 
His point: this was no time to bring up rightness of demands.  Solidarity was at issue.  Fr. Sirico is making that point.  Just because you support freedom of association does not mean you are with the public unions at a time of dreadful financial crisis.