Tale of two delays

Yesterday’s Antietam is today’s Afghanistan?  Consider

General George B. McClellan, whose willingness to delay action and refusal to do so allowed enemy forces to prepare and react.

The delay was leading up to what became “the bloodiest battle of the Civil War, in fact, the single bloodiest day in American military history,” writes J.P. Freire, Wash. Examiner associate commentary editor.

It was McClellan’s “willingness to delay action [that] allowed enemy forces to prepare and react.”

Of him, Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee said:

“He is an able general but a very cautious one. His army is in a very demoralized and chaotic condition, and will not be prepared for offensive operations—or he will not think it so—for three or four weeks.”

Freire:

General [Gen. Stanley A.] McChrystal told the president that the war could be lost in a year, and three months of that year have been given to the enemy to regroup and prepare. . . .  If you have a general who is competent, as McChrystal is, give him what he says he needs to win.

Or if you consider him incompetent, fire him, as Lincoln did McClellan.  Do it or get off the pot.

ACORN and its Catholic donations

The latest from ACORN:

Shockingly, we now learn that the ACORN office in National City (San Diego County) engaged in a massive document dump on the evening of October 9th, containing thousands upon thousands of sensitive documents, just days prior to the Attorney General’s visit.

SanDiegoACORNDocumentDumpScandal-100909-Photo4

BigGovernment.com has learned that not only did this document dump occur, but the documents in question were irresponsibly and brazenly dumped in a public dumpster, without considering laws and regulations as to how sensitive information should be treated.

Would the Catholic Campaign for Human Development know if this is the same ACORN that until a year ago got Catholic donations?  I think it is.

FDIC-FBOP-GEITHNER-GOOF-etc.

Remember the odd thing about Park National Bank’s demise?  How on the fateful day, it got money from Treasury for poor neighborhoods?  Well, FDIC, which supervised the demise, blames T-Sec Geithner for the gaffe-goof, as reported by The Street-dot-com on 11/1, two days after the seizure:

The Treasury Department, not the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., should be held responsible for a public relations gaffe last month in which the FDIC closed a Chicago bank just hours after it received an award from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, according to FDIC spokesman David Barr.

The grim details:

Park National Bank of Chicago received $50 million in tax credits to encourage investment in poor communities at an Oct. 30 ceremony attended by Geithner. Hours later . . . it was seized along with eight other banks around the country that formed part of a holding company called FBOP Corp. and sold to U.S. Bancorp.

However:

One financial services executive, who did not want to be on the record for fear of running afoul of regulators, accused the FDIC of timing the closure as it did in a deliberate effort to embarrass Geithner.

Among a dozen or so comments disputing or accepting this claim is a call by CNBC’s Jim Cramer for FDIC head Sheila Bair’s ouster as “as a rogue operator who cannot be reined in,” to which came a rejoinder by commenter CedricT:

Not really—it just shows how poorly managed and co-oordinated our Government is—these turf wars are their life blood. . . .  Looks like the same happened in Ft Hood–the FBI knew about the mad Major but neglected to tell the Army—and these are the guys who are going to “Fix” the Healthcare system–God Help us!!

Normally, I say leave God out of it, but this time prayer seems appropriate.

Finally, the article itself ends with this about what the hell happened to FBOP:

Though Park National was relatively healthy, it was shuttered because it could not cover the losses of other banks in the FBOP holding company.

Yes, we understood that, especially in Oak Park, which may never recover from the shock of it all. 

Then too, the buying into governmentally approved and supervised (?!) operations:

In addition to the usual real estate loans gone bad that have dogged virtually every institution from Bank of America . . . to Goldman Sachs . . . the FBOP banks had big losses on preferred shares of Fannie Mae . . . and Freddie Mac . . . according to a report in the Wall Street Journal [here] . . .

How WSJ characterized FBOP owner Mike Kelly:

The nine small banks represented the holdings of FBOP Corp., based in Oak Park, Ill., and owned by a banker who had plowed into real-estate lending around the country. [italics added]

Cost to FDIC: $2.5 billion.

A (non-Oak Park) banker put it to me this way: FDIC was cutting its losses by moving when it did, forestalling FBOP’s cutting loose its troubled banks (assets) and leaving FDIC with something unsalable.  Better for taxpayers, the argument goes, to have the whole bunch of them and making a sale — in this case to U.S. Bank.

Total number of failed banks this year: 115, the most since 1992, when 181 banks collapsed during the savings-and-loan crisis — which is when Kelly began to expand his holdings, buying banks outside Chicago that proved his undoing.

The content of their character

This from the redoubtable Heather Mac Donald in City Journal tells us what “even playing field” means to some people — equal results, across the board:

As part of its plan to comply with a federal desegregation order now decades old, Tucson’s school district adopted racial quotas in school discipline this summer.

Schools that suspend or expel Hispanic and black students at higher rates than white students will now get a visit from a district “Equity Team” and will be expected to remedy those disparities by reducing their minority discipline rates.

In Oak Park discipline rates are regularly discussed with a view to disparity of punishment.  Objectors to how more often blacks are punished even brought in elected officials from outside Oak Park.  But nothing like this has happened.  No one has called from a quota that I know of.

As for the language abuse embodied in that “playing field” stuff, it’s been lambasted best by George Orwell in his “Politics and the English Language,” in which he notes the role of language in stultifying our processes:

[Our language] becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.

The ebullient, even bombastic Ezra Pound was even more condemnatory in “A Problem of (Specifically) Style” in 1934:

[A] tolerance for slipshod expression in whatever department of writing gradually leads to chaos . . . and a progressive rottenness of spirit.

In Tucson the pattern seems clear enough:

Tucson’s administrators explain their disciplinary quota pressure on the ground that students removed from class lose valuable learning time, exacerbating the already great ethnic academic achievement gap.

Such thinking ignores the students who are not disrupting class or threatening teachers and who also lose valuable learning time when unruly or violent students remain in the classroom.

Mac Donald adds:

Surely those students have a greater claim to “equity” in school resources than gang members do.

Schools are to look for “root causes” in bad behavior.  Mac Donald:

I can save them some time: the root cause of disparate rates of suspension is disparate rates of bad behavior.

“Single parenting” is the biggest one.

If the Tucson school board wants to publicize the essential role of fathers in raising law-abiding children, it might start solving the problem of disciplinary imbalance.

But until then, it should let schools resolve their discipline problems in a color-blind fashion, without worrying about a visit from an “Equity Team.”

It’s “the content of their character,” as Martin Luther King said in his “I have a dream” speech.

Rev. Jesse Jackson wants no part of that.  He calls invoking King in this context is “intellectual terrorism.”  Orwellian, right?

Prominent Wheeling Jesuit alum slams Giulietti firing

A contributor and volunteer fund-raiser for Wheeling Jesuit University has withdrawn his promised support amounting to $650,000 in cash and property bequests in protest of the firing in August of Rev. Julio Giulietti, SJ, as president.

The firing was “the most cowardly, deceitful and morally perverse action that I have ever witnessed,” said Stephen E. Haid in an Oct. 18 letter to interim President J. Davitt McAteer.  Blithe Spirit has obtained a copy of the letter.

Haid, a 1963 graduate of Wheeling Jesuit and longtime teacher at West Virginia University until becoming a teachers union lobbyist and then campaign chairman and later cabinet member in Gov. Gaston Caperton’s administration, blames the firing on three people or groups:

* Bishop Michael Bransfield of Wheeling, who “wanted to slap [Giulietti] down” because Giulietti “sought to acquire the [adjacent] Mount de Chantal property for Wheeling Jesuit.”

* “An element on the Board of Directors . . . who want to micromanage the University, who want any president to be an errand boy.”

* The three Jesuit trustees who “in an irregular night session” voted to fire Giulietti.

Haid was named last March by Giulietti as one of two Special Assistants to the President for Advancement to work on planned giving, endowment development and alumni partnerships, with an office on campus.

It was a continuation of his working “very closely” with Giulietti “for at least a year,” he said in his letter.

Among Haid’s other activities is to serve with Bishop Bransfield on the board of the West Virginia KIDS COUNT Fund, founded in 1989 by Gov. Caperton, who later became president of The College Board.

Haid has also served on the board of governors of Marshall University, in Huntington, WV — at one time as a member of its executive committee.

To the NY 23 victor go the — what?

Yesterday’s loser in NY 23, Doug Hoffman, is in for a hard time as a Republican?

Hoffman’s candidacy generated much talk of a civil war in the GOP. Ironically, it is [the winner, Bill] Owens who is about to learn firsthand what it’s like to belong to a majority that brooks no dissent.

That’s Stephen Spruiell at National Review Online, who has more:

When Blue Dogs voiced their concerns over the speed at which Pelosi was attempting to ram the health-care overhaul through the House, their fellow Democrats responded with contemptuous sneers.

Rep. Maxine Waters, the liberal lawmaker from California, criticized Rahm Emanuel’s strategy of recruiting conservative Democrats to run in right-leaning districts, saying that Emanuel’s “chickens have come home to roost.” Former DNC chief Howard Dean warned of primary challenges for Blue Dogs if they didn’t support the public option.

And those will be his seatmates and/or fellows in politics between now and the next election in less than a year?

 

Park National double-crossed?

Today’s Trib reports a letter from banker Michael Kelly to Oak Park-based FBOP employees that more or less blames FDIC for its going under — rules change did them in, he says.

Kelly, who lives in next-door-to-Oak Park River Forest (IL), has been quite a financial supporter of Christ the King Jesuit College Prep on the West Side, on the former Resurrection parish school property.

Don Harmon on the move

Not sure what this means.  On the surface, it seems that Harmon is making his move, Davis is dithering and losing out — as he is bound to, being so obviously left-wing and an unreliable campaigner to boot.

Sen. Don Harmon has filed for 7th District State Central Committeeman against Congressman Danny Davis. Davis has filed for Congress and Cook County Board President. He has until next Monday to decide which office to seek.

That is, I don’t know if it’s a surprise or what it represents by way of guard-changing.

Wimp city

Dennis Byrne finds much to complain about in Illinois and Chicago corruption:

Chicago is wimp city. A city full of obsequious voters, businesses and civic groups that have been repeatedly swindled, scammed and hosed by local politicians. Yet, with each betrayal, the serfs continue to grovel before such liege lords as Mayor Richard M. Daley and House Speaker Michael Madigan and beg for more of the same. Nothing is egregious enough to inspire insurrection by the city and state’s vassals.

Overstated?  Take plastics, into which The Graduate was urged to go on his big day:

Daley now is fighting to keep a huge national plastics industry convention from fleeing Chicago, its 40-year home. The show brought in $95.3 million last June, but it appears the exhibitors are fed up with the extravagant costs they must pay to riggers, tradesmen and other organized workers at McCormick Place. As the trade publication Plastics News reported, Daley met Wednesday in his office with convention officials to plead with them to stay.

Won’t you stay here, Bill Plastics, won’t you stay here?

As trade show exhibitor Tim Hanrahan explained in the publication, it cost $345 to get four cases of Pepsi to his booth. “The invoice breaks down to $254 for the four cases of Pepsi, a 21 percent service charge, and a 10.25 percent Illinois state sales tax, a 3 percent Chicago soft drink tax, a tax on the service charge and a food and beverage tax. Government taxes totaled $38.06, which is more than the legitimate retail price of the soft drinks,” he said. “I could go on. A $640 TV stand rental is another good example,” he said. “But you get the point.”

Taxes, we got taxes.  Like California:

In America’s federal system, some states, such as California, offer residents a “package deal” that bundles numerous and ambitious public benefits with the high taxes needed to pay for them. Other states, such as Texas, offer packages combining modest benefits and low taxes. These alternatives, of course, define the basic argument between liberals and conservatives over what it means to get the size and scope of government right.

Thus spake William Voegeli in LA Times, in a shortened version of a City Journal article.

[T]here’s an intense debate over which model is more admirable and sustainable. What is surprising is the growing evidence that the low-benefit/low-tax package not only succeeds on its own terms but also according to the criteria used to defend its opposite. In other words, the superior public goods that supposedly justify the high taxes just aren’t being delivered.

Take California, where taxes are high and things aren’t working, vs. Texas, where they are low and things are.  Take Chicago, where a $95.3 million convention is considering saying adieu, my friends, adieu, can no longer stay with you, and the big news is budget crunch and threatened services.  Please?

 

Laura W: Let chips fall

It was amazing.  The Nov. 2 column by Laura Washington left me speechless, which since I’m a gabby fellow does not often happen.  [See LW’s lede for model here.]

It’s about this bunch of Chi Trib retirees getting together to do so-called public service reporting — all white, almost all male of a certain age.

So what?  It’s their nickel, their time, requiring no federal money.  Let ‘em go, forget about it.  That’s my advice.  They will succeed or they won’t.  In this day there are no news monopolies, so the market will decide.

As for so-called diversity, which is Laura’s requirement, please.  In lieu of fast-disappearing professionalism, the only diversity that matters is political.  Socio-political-economic, I suppose.  O’Shea and friends are not likely to supply that, especially if NYTimes is their anchor buyer.