It’s up and down hallways and stairs. Not kidding.
That religious freedom rally that got ignored by newspapers and TV and radio: making this an exclusive.
“Today everybody’s a Catholic,” said an Anglican priest from the speaker’s platform at the media-ignored Federal Plaza rally for religious freedom on March 23 attended by hundreds. He was Rev. Stewart Ruch, senior pastor of the 950-member , in Wheaton. On the platform with him was Rev. Kevin Miller, associate rector, who gave the closing prayer.
A deacon from the same parish, Rev. Keith Hartsell, associate pastor for mission, stood in the rear of the crowd, making quite a figure in his jeans-cum-clerical collar, standing with two (“the middle two”) of his and his wife’s four children, pre-schoolers ensconced in a double stroller.
The parish has a grand total of four priests and four deacons on staff, Deacon Hartsell said. It’s enough to remind one of Roman Catholic parishes of old, with rectories full to bursting with priests, though these priests with wives and children — the senior pastor and…
View original post 525 more words
Short ‘graphs and menace
“Occasional, short, italicized paragraphs . . . with undercurrent of menace, gives . . . powerful and immediate tone,” says reviewer in Times Literary Supplement of The Mirador, dreamed memories of her mother.
It struck home with me as what I’d like to do with my various books in the hopper, in the writing of which I find myself bored. If I’m bored, how will the reader feel? I ask myself. The reviewer speaks of what the writer inserted. Some possibilities here, as of now only dimly imagined.
A St. Peter’s Sunday
Shot down to the Loop on Palm Sunday for mass at St. Peter’s on Madison Street. Green Line Special, fast and easy.
I went partly for that urban anonymity celebrated 50 years ago by Harvey Cox in his Secular City. I found the crowd leaving the 9:30 mass, then waited for the 11:00.
Found the service:
Neither pedestrian nor parochial.
Marvelous organ playing as mood-setter and during mass, never intrusive. The hymns were sacred, no pop melodies to be heard. Acoustics excellent, nearby pre-mass chatting was absorbed, presented no problem to the would-be meditater.
Sermon short and to the point (after long reading of passion). Reading mainly by 50–ish short-haired petite blond woman in vestments who in the spoken word approximated the depersonalized, ceremonial style of the chant. Same for other parts taken, each by a priest — the celebrant and his helper at the altar, acting as a sort of combination deacon and server.
Nothing amateurish or stylized about any of this. Indeed, the whole liturgy exuded professionalism, as in the church’s excellent sound system. The building itself matters, and expense is there, but there’s also attention to important detail. It’s how a parish can spend its money well.
Later: Holy (Maundy) Thursday and Good Friday, more of the same. Huge crowds, as today, they crowded in the back at 1:15 or so, filled the center aisle waiting in silence to “adore” (I’d say “venerate”) the cross, a Good Friday staple. Preacher noted that Jesus’ “It is finished” from the cross has recently been discovered (the Greek word) to mean pay or paid — “paid in full” on the recently excavated tax-collector’s site. So Jesus paid up for us all, restoring the balance so we have an even playing field, you might say.
Personal high moment in today’s passion narrative, per John’s gospel, was Jesus from the cross, looking at his mother and saying, “Behold your son.” Poignant doesn’t do that justice. The preacher cited that, repeating from the gospel, as I recall, so chalk up another for him.
Occurred to me about St. Peter’s: it’s not a parish church, which I knew, but an adjunct to Old St. Mary’s, once on the south edge of the Loop, for some time now in the heart of the farther, relatively new South Loop residential neighborhood, whose parish includes the Loop. I doubt if they have baptisms and weddings at St. Peter’s, for instance, though they clearly have regulars who donate and help out. So what is it? A mission church, for one of the nation’s biggest commercial districts.
Married priests vs. female priests
I, Bowman in Wed. Journal today. Married priesthood first, women’s second, for strategic reasons if nothing else:
The married priest is more likely to see the woman’s viewpoint, and a married priesthood is a much more realistic goal.
Respondeth one John Butch Murtagh from Oak Park to the first part:
Nice try Jim, but if marriage is the key to understand[ing] the other sex, why are there so many divorces?
To which I, Bowman:
Nice try, John, but if divorce demonstrates misogynism and/or misandry, why for so many does remarriage signal the triumph of hope over experience, as The Great Cham said long ago?
Lily and John with “Blackbird”
Obama vs. the courts
Judges have right to overturn a law? Rather, does Obama think they do? These judges want to know.
Progressivism unleashed: the sliming of Santorum
Old news, yes (2003), but current. Gives one a sense of what’s out there in leftist land.
Campaign for “santorum” neologism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Steve Chapman madder than hell and will take it no longer
Conservatives who raise dire alarms about what will happen in Barack Obama’s second term face a similar problem. They need him to lose so their predictions will not be exposed as products of raging paranoia.
That’s from Chi Trib’s resident conservative editorial board member and columnist. Is he mad at people who say mean things about Obama, or isn’t he? Dispeptic? [Oops, dyspeptic]
via Obama’s second term: Fraudulent fears of Obama’s second term – Chicago Tribune.

Making sure you are not misunderstood
Wondering about the situation or plight of ecumenism in these perilous days, Martin Marty as expected touches all bases, including the objection to his worried tone that I had right off, as he heard from a friend,
“What are Christians in mainline and moderate and (gulp!) liberal styles griping about. They won!”
I note the “gulp!” insertion. It’s the obligatory understated distancing himself from this concern or at least the “liberal” part. It’s what you do when giving heed to those who are not like him and his followers, lest anyone think he’s weakening on the point. Lots of people do this. I have.