John Huebscher, executive director of the Wisconsin Catholic Conference, said the recent protests . . . are unlike anything he has ever seen [in his 40
years] working in or around the capitol . . . .
“The bishops are very careful — it’s a balanced statement,” he said. Unions, “just like anybody else, have to consider the good and make sacrifices.”
However, it’s “a mistake to cite hard times as a reason to dismiss or marginalize unions.” Tilt. Financial crisis? Favored union status? Don’t mention it.
The bishops are merely reminding everybody of the teaching of the Church [about] the dignity of work and the appropriate place for unions without giving them carte blanche to have everything they want. [italics mine]
They are not merely reminding, they are injecting stuff into the middle of a hot political situation. Let us not play dumb here.
The bishops’ man continues:
Does the bill serve to marginalize unions? Does this serve to drastically reduce the ability of worker to articulate and protect their interests? Those are fair questions to engage. [Flack, flack.]
More flacking:
Huebscher observed that the bill has struck such a chord with Wisconsin citizens because of its potentially far reaching implications for public and private employees.
Struck such a what kind of chord? What’s he talking about?
If the state as a matter of public policy can say that workers are going to be very limited in what they can bargain for, that will seep into other segments of the economy, he said. I think workers perceive that this is going to affect them, even workers that aren’t unionized. [union argument]
Huebscher added that there are benefits employees in the state have today that they didn’t have decades ago such as just wages [justice! yes!], paid overtime, 40-hour work weeks and the inability to be fired without due process. Union talking point.
Ditto reference to “time when [unemployment and workers compensation] weren’t available, followed by reference to “a sense among working people that while they don’t belong to a union today things they have exist today because unions fought for them. And they’re concerned about losing that.”
And we the bishops take that union argument very seriously, do we not, says their interpreter with 40 years experience. In fact, Wisconsin’s “long tradition of integrating and affirming workers” — what the hell does that mean? — “parallels . . . the development of Catholic social teaching and the rights of labor.”
Applause, cheers, trumpet blasts: Spoken by a true labor skate of the 19th or early 20th century. Give him the hook.
But also give him credit for being glad there’s been no violence so far, noting that the bishops have “urged people to remain civil, talk to each other, and keep the common good in mind.”
It is especially in times of crisis that new forms of cooperation and open communication become essential. We request that lawmakers carefully consider the implications of this proposal and evaluate it in terms of its impact on the common good. We also appeal to everyone lawmakers, citizens, workers, and labor unions to move beyond divisive words and actions and work together, so that Wisconsin can recover in a humane way from the current fiscal crisis.
It’s the archbishop of Milwaukeein a valiant attempt to find guidance in encyclicals.
Fairfax County Circuit Judge Michael Devine sentenced Felix Owino on Friday to five years, but suspended all but nine months of the sentence, according to the court clerk’s office. Owino already has served seven months. Owino pleaded guilty in September NECN · 35 minutes ago
W.Va. priest sentenced on molestation conviction
Fairfax County Circuit Judge Michael Devine sentenced Felix Owino on Friday to five years, but suspended all but nine months of the sentence, according to the court clerk’s office. Owino already has served seven months. Owino pleaded guilty in September NECN · 53 minutes ago
Priest Who Sexually Abused Girl Gets Suspended Sentence; Will Serve 1 1/2 Months
A former local priest will serve less than two more months in jail for sexual assaulting a child in Virginia. Rev. Felix Owino pleaded guilty in September to inappropriately touching an 11-year-old girl last year in Fairfax. WTOV 9 · 2 hours ago
Former Ohio Valley Priest Sentenced for Sexual Assault Against Child
FAIRFAX, Va. — A local priest is sentenced for sexual assault in a Fairfax, Va. courtroom. Father Felix Owino was sentenced Friday to five years, with all but nine months suspended. Owino was credited for the seven The State Journal · 1 hour ago
Former WV Priest Sentenced For Virginia Crime
Fr. Felix C. Owino was sentenced to five years and nine months in prison after a previous guilty to plea to aggravated sexual battery involving an 11-year-old girl. The judge suspended five years of the sentence and ordered Owino to jail for nine months.Metro News · 2 hours ago
Wall St. Journal tells percentage of Wisconsin public employees unionists’ compensation that would go for pensions, vs. “little or nothing” at this point:
Gov. [Scott] Walker first introduced his “budget repair” bill a week ago, setting off the firestorm that has swept the Capitol. Besides limiting collective-bargaining rights for most workersexcepting police, firefighters and others involved in public safetyit would require government workers, who currently contribute little or nothing to their pensions, to contribute 5.8% of their pay to pensions, and pay at least 12.6% of health-care premiums, up from an average of 6%.
Walker’s proposal would . . . require all [non-public
safety] state workers to pay half their pension costs and 12.6% of their healthcare coverage, shaving an estimated $330 million off a $3.6-billion deficit.
Half the cost vs. 5.8% of workers’ pay gives us quite a different number to mull over bkfst coffee.
Trib also cites “conservative analysts” as having “long contended that excessively powerful unions representing teachers, welfare workers and other state and local employees have boosted pay and pensions across the country, laying the groundwork for the nation’s fiscal crisis.”
Correct, but Wall St. Jnl slaps this graph on its page 2:
Source: Labor Dept., as noted, providing ample grist for those conservatives’ mill.
Blacks . . . have much higher rates of abortions than whites or other minority groups. In 2000, while blacks made up 17 percent of live births, they made up more than twice that share of abortions (36 percent). . . . . The comparison with whites and other minorities is striking. Whites made up 78 percent of live births, but only 57 percent of abortions. Non-black minorities had 7 percent of live births and 5 percent of abortions.
In other words, there are fewer blacks in general, especially in big cities:
Monsignor William Lynn, who served as the secretary for clergy [vicar for priests] . . . under then-Philadelphia Archbishop Anthony Bevilacqua, was charged with two counts of endangering the welfare of a child in connection with . . . alleged assaults, Williams said.
From 1992 until 2004, Lynn was responsible for investigating reports that priests had sexually abused children, the district attorney’s office said.
The grand jury found that Lynn, 60, endangered children, including the alleged victims of those charged last week, by knowingly allowing dangerous priests to continue in the ministry in roles in which they had access to kids.
Allen explains:
“This is apparently the first time that a Catholic leader has been charged criminally for the cover-up as opposed to the abuse itself,” he said. “It sends a shot across the bow for bishops and other diocesan officials in other parts of the country, who have to wonder now if they’ve got criminal exposure, too.”
Wed. Journal reported a drop in OP’s black population, and readers weighed in. Is there a more vocal village in the world?
Violet Aura starts it off, mildly enough:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:23 PM: Hmm…I don’t know what to make of these numbers. I look around and see (what appears to be) higher numbers of Black students at OPRF [high school than] when I attended. Likewise, just walking down the street I see many Blacks in Downtown OP. It could be that some of them don’t actually reside in OP; I don’t know. But census numbers may not count those who are living with relatives.
Tom Scharre takes a certain amount of issue with her, also mildly enough, if not crystal clearly:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:40 PM: I am old enough to have often heard -and occasionally used- the socially acceptable default disclaimer:”I don’t care if you’re white, black, yellow or green…” But, forgive me Lord, I am beginning to be the teensiest bit concerned if you’re “violet.”
OPer then takes the gloves off, finding his inner fascist along the way:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:42 PM: Violet, racists such as yourself are not only always seeing scary Blacks everywhere they go, but typically cannot distinguish between self-reported anecdote and actual evidence. Please, WJ, again would you consider limiting the participation of racists like VA? They only pollute the discussion, and make OP appear more racist than it truly is. [Italics mine]
Benita from Oak Park expands on the theme, with a right, then a left, then a blow to the midsection:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:49 PM: So “Violet Aura”, could it be that black people who don’t actually live in OP could still work, shop, dine, visit and park here (and thank you to them – we need the business and parking revenue!) which could be why you see so many more in downtown OP? And just how long ago were you attending OPRF [High]? And by not counting residents who are “living with relatives”? My husband and I live in our Oak Park home with our kids. We’re all related, a.k.a “relatives.” Is that what you mean?!
Long-time Oak Park Resident from Oak Park IL brings in neighboring, affluent River Forest and Trader Joe’s (!):
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 05:49 PM: Violet, perhaps you only NOTICE the blacks (for whatever reason). Having read many of your postings [which I have not, btw], you seem to have a distinct fascination with blacks. Looking around downtown Oak Park would not be the most credible way to refute the census facts. Dare I say some River Foresters might happen over to our downtown area, or residents of many other neighboring villages might stumble to our Trader Joe’s or Lake Theatre? What isn’t surprising is that you were the first to comment. [Will have to
read Violet more often.]
Tibbis
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:01 PM: Violet, my g/f and I moved to Oak Park and purchased a home because of the diversity and open- mindedness of the Oak Park community. My g/f is from NYC and did not like Chicago because people are so racist, closed minded, ect. Oak Park is one of the few communities around that supports diversity. I am proud to live here, how about you? Furthermore, lifes too short to hate anyone. Hatred for others is hatred for yourself. [Good
point!]]
Tom Scharre again, again mildly, tho cherishing animus twd Violet:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:06 PM: @OPer: freedom of speech for everyone – even the violet among us.
Violet (finally) begins her rebuttal:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:08 PM: Wow! Thank you all for such reactionary posts. Everyone just tripping over each other to call me names, eh? Reread my post. I am simply stating my observations versus what the report states. Not once did I express dismay at seeming to see more Blacks in the area; YOU added your subjective conditioned Pavlovian response to my post! Without going into specifics, I am of mixed ethnicity. The ONLY PLACE where I was ever called a slur was in my lovely hometown of Oak Park! I look ETHNIC, not White! [Bravo!]
Mustaine has the answer:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:10 PM: Who cares what Violet thinks?????????
Violet, in no way to be shushed, doubles down:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:11 PM: As to my looks, I actually recently had an Oak Parker ask me where I was “from.” When I said OP, he said “No, originally.” I asked him if I had an accent because I was baffled by such a question (I was born in Chicago and grew up in OP.). He stated that someone as “exotic-looking” as I must have been born somewhere else! I guess only blonde-haired, blue-eyed people are native to USA! I don’t think like this. I happen to be interested [in] sociology and race issues. YOU all need to check yourselves!
kathryn jonas from oak park has a question that ranges beyond Violet:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:11 PM: Has it occurred to the Wednesday Journal that African Americans may move out of Oak Park for reasons other than “affordability”? Such as the fact that Oak Park may not be as welcoming as the official PR would suggest? The lack of black representation on the Village Board, citizens commissions, school boards, park board and township board should raise questions about the lack of diversity in these areas. I know many white people who have moved out of Oak Park because it is not affordable.
More from Violet, who clearly is having a good time with it all:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:15 PM: And one more thing–all this PC crap hasn’t changed a damn thing. Ever see online comments and all the racism? You cannot legislate racial tolerance. The only way to change hearts and minds is to have people live next to one another and see how similar they are. But freaking out because I notice people’s race/ethnicity is self-deluding. You [notice], too. You just think it’s taboo to admit it. It’s hardwired into us to look at people’s appearances. The real test is not to treat people differently.
Puzzled from Oak Park has a curve ball:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:23 PM: Why can the black population be made public but the black criminals can not be made public? [Uh-oh]
Daniel Lauber has “the actual figures” that supply the compared-to-what? info missing from the story:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:29 PM:The proportion of whites in Oak Park fell from 71.9% in 2000 to 70.2% in 2010 and blacks from 23.5% to 22.5%. Meanwhile Asians increased from 0.01% to 5% and Hispanics from 4% to 6.8%.
He raises another point, about income as determinant:
The real question is what the proportions would be in a free housing market where income determines where you live — something we can’t calculate until household income by race figures are released in 2012.
Violet picks up on this new train, ruminating on changes yet to come:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:40 PM: The thing that I wonder about, regarding OP’s demographics, is what is going to happen three, five years down the line when you have these outrageously high tax rates and devalued houses? Isn’t the tax rate supposed to mirror the property’s value? How can social workers and teachers afford to live in OP with such ridiculous charges? So I am thinking that we will see more and more people moving in who may not share the values and perspective of the middle-class. . . . .
J.G. Morales LOL@ Violet, having heard “the exotic thing” all his life:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:40 PM: . . . and so has anyone else who looks “exotic”. White, black, latino, asian, middle eastern have all asked where we’re from. I find it very ironic that you mention having these problems in Oak Park. I’ve stayed here because these things happen FAR LESS often in Oak Park. Never once a racial slur. As far as they know, the only “race” my children have is “American” and it’s a beautiful thing! Only in Oak Park.:-) [Go,
J.G.!]
Edye from River Forest picks up on the black-perp question asked 35 minutes earlier:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:58 PM: Puzzled from Oak Park: You asked an interesting question: “Why can the black population be made public but the black criminals can not be made public?” Why not say the same for the white criminals? [Huh?] Not that I care, but there is such a thing. My family is one of quite a few black families who moved out of Oak Park – not because of “affordability” But because we found homes better suited for us in… River Forest. [Ha!]
Meta-comment: Police reports are color-blind. Crime is colorless. School programs, on the other hand, to take one example, are color-conscious to the Nth degree. Why is that?
Violet on slurs in ’80s:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 06:58 PM: Well, I just have my own experiences to go by. And the slur was directed at me by guys that I probably went to school with. This is not recent at all. This occurred in the mid-’80s. So I suspect that times have changed quite a bit. OP is full of educated people and that is what helps things. Actually, a lot of the clashing that people have is more based upon socioeconomic class (or perceptions of such) than actual race/ethnicity.
Violet on River Forest as “status thing”:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 07:28 PM: @Edye: Just curious: what is so special about the housing stock in RF that you could not find in OP? Please tell me that this is not a status thing! I can’t stand when I tell people where I live (RF) and they start oohing and ahhing and I’m like “Um, no. I rent an apt.” The whole snobbery angle is so tired for me. I am not accusing you of such, however, but you seemed to imply that you could not find anything suitable in OP and that is hard to believe.
J.G. Morales back at her on slur business etc.:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 08:27 PM: IDK [I don’t know?], Violet. You’re mentioning the evil racist deeds of Oak Parkers as some slam on OP? I don’t really get it. I do agree, however, that socio-economic background seems to be more important than race. Also, I find this article interesting because I too have noticed more blacks in the neighborhood. From 2 to 6 families on my block. Same for Latinos. Yet, I don’t really understand why this is news.
And a few minutes later, J.G. Morales again, with what were closing remarks when I closed down last night:
Posted: Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 08:34 PM: Race seems to be such a confusing issue in this country. We talk about equality and diversity and equal opportunity all while keeping tabs and differentiating. I don’t think we’re going to get rid of racial problems by making a huge deal about race.
Top right, man with union label.
