Reverse-Borking

Frank Ricci is the New Haven fireman who led the way in the anti-reverse-discrimination case in which Sotomayor was judged on the losing side.  Libs want Sotomayor, so . . .

On Friday, citing in an e-mail “Frank Ricci’s troubled and litigious work history,” the liberal advocacy group People for the American Way drew reporters’ attention to Ricci’s past. Other advocates for Sotomayor have discreetly urged journalists to pursue similar story lines.

The American way?

Will reporters bite?  Is the Pope Catholic?

Things Palin could never have achieved

Instapundit pointed me to New Editor, which pointed me to this by David Harsanyi in the Denver Post.  See how the blogosphere works?

Can you believe the gall of these Sarah Palin cultists? Presidential aspirations? This is a woman who named one of her kids “Track,” for God’s sake. (Well, if it really is her kid.)

Bear with this fellow.  He’s on to something.

Really, where would we be if a bumpkin like Palin were president? With her brainpower, we’d probably be stuck with a Cabinet full of tax cheats, retreads and moralizing social engineers.

If Palin were president, chances are we’d have a gaffe-generating motor mouth for a vice president. That’s the kind of decision-making one expects from Miss Congeniality.

Chances are, yes.

The job of building generational debt is not for the unsophisticated.

You gotta have heart.

Enriching political donors with taxpayer dollars takes intellectual prowess, not the skills of a moose-hunting point guard.

That’s her, all right.

The idea of printing money we don’t have to pay for programs we can’t afford is, apparently, the work of a finely tuned imagination, soaring gravitas and endless policy know-how.

Palin is so clueless she probably would have rushed through some colossal stimulus plan that ended up stimulating nothing.

Ain’t we lucky, to be spared all that? 

It’s another case of asking compared to what?  Always ask and insist on an answer to this pivotal question, lest ye be fooled.

The Chicago Way, part one thousand-and-something . . .

The very important, maybe irreplaceable Fran Spielman has the p-one Sun-Times story of the plumbing inspector who don’t want no trouble with permit-givers.

Sources said the $85,068-a-year inspector was working a side job installing a flood-control system in the 3500 block of North Octavia — with no permit and none of the required city licenses — when he inadvertently broke the water pipe leading to the home.

He (gulp) called the city for help, told leak-investigators he was an inspector, asked for free parts to repair the leak (!!**##%%!!), got turned in by a whistle-blower of note who happened to answer his call. got cited for doing work without a permit — “two or three different licenses” were needed, says the w-blower — and had to stop work on his project.

But wait.  This guy knows what it takes to get a permit, and if he doesn’t, he can go to Chicago’s long-overdue Department of Zoning Oversight Fellowship Forum (DOZ-OFF), where PDB, “the Intern Architect,” tells a story of waiting in line at the zoning department and being “handed poop in a bag.”

[A]n entry-level architect brings an interior renovation project to Chicago’s Department of Zoning at 8:15 a.m. . . . hoping to start the . . . process of obtaining a building permit from behind the city’s fortress of ordinances. 

He has . . . arrived before the office’s official opening at 8:30am, but is turned away at the gate.  The list is full; the waiting room is full.  The city’s (4) plan reviewers already have permit-seekers at their desks, studying plans and applications for the unallowable build, the unchecked use, and the unregistered driveway.  He must come back tomorrow; 6:30am is recomended. 

Uncommonly crowded?  No, the same as yesterday.  The same as everyday.

There’s more more more where that came from, at that Zoning Fellowship Forum.

Wuxtry, good guy gets murdered

What does it say about the finely tuned sensibilities of newspaper editors that they consistently, time and again, all the time [oops! see below and Trib story] run murder stories emphasizing the victim, usually as undeserving of his murder, when readers like me want to know rather about the son of a bitch who did it?

As in this story, barely retrievable on the clunky Sun-Times site (no clunkier than Chi Trib’s), about the nice-guy landlord and the 28–year-old accused:

William Hallin went out of his way to help the people living in his two Chicago apartment buildings — doing repairs promptly and even taking some residents their mail when he stopped by, tenants said Sunday.

His easygoing manner made it even more difficult for those who knew the 67-year-old Hallin to understand how he could have been beaten to death, then set on fire — allegedly by a tenant who owed rent money.

As if most murders made sense and were richly deserved.  Look up the accused, people.  We are used to reading about murders and having our heartstrings tugged.  We are more interested in social pathology than social justice, however misguidingly that is conceived.

Later: I was so busy generalizing about murder stories, citing only Sun-Times, that I never got around to reading Chi Trib on the same story.  My friend and news bulldog Nicholas Stix did, and nails it in his follow-up comment below.  Much thanks to him and to this interactive medium known as blogging, which by its nature, like charity, covers a multitude of sins, including omissions.

Thanks also, and this is very important, to Chicago not being a one-newspaper town.  I’ve said it before: what one misses, the other gets for us.  That’s competition, folks, the lifeblood of newspapering and almost everything else in a capitalistic, free, society.

Advice for the sheep-like

“It’s not enough to bleat,” Frary said. “If you just bleat, you’re a sheep waiting to get fleeced.”

That’s my friend John, at a TEA Party rally in Augusta, Maine, urging people to sign petitions opposing runaway taxation.

He himself ran for Congress (and lost) last election, is retired from teaching, has a way with words.

TEA stands for Taxed Enough Already, or has been since the Boston Tea Party, one of our early anti-taxation events, became the model for a national movement some months back.

Relatively amorphous now, it has legs and will be an important part of the national mix yet.  Might make a difference in the coming mid-terms, that is.

Usage loses two

Sarah Palin’s advisors “sniped with other Republicans,” reports AP’s Rachel d’Oro.

She means “argued with.”

Her spokeswoman “shot down speculation” that Palin would do such and such.

She means “tried to shoot down” or “denied,” unless d’Oro wants to say the spokeswoman convinced her, which goes against standard practice.

Then there’s this from Wm. Yardley in NY Times:

So while her announcement on Friday that she would step down less than three years into her term made for shocking political news, it kind of felt familiar to many Alaskans.

“Kind of”?  In the nation’s newspaper?  Why not just “kinda”?  With a “gosh” thrown in?

And this from Andy Ostroy at Huffington Post:  Palin “literally came out of nowhere” on to the national scene.

Look.  No one literally comes out of nowhere.  Literally she came out of Wasilla, figuratively out of nowhere.

Johnny faces music, Richie explains everything

“Where have you been, you rascal you?” some of you may be asking.  Well, it’s been vacation time-cum-time with family extended and otherwise.  But here I am back at the K-board, 24 hours after pursuing Johnny in the guise of a great white shark in the shallow-end waters of Rehm Pool. 

So unrelenting was my pursuit, in fact, that Johnny (entering first grade in the fall) bumped into woman-with-child-already-born-and-clinging to her, winning himself a scolding.  At sight of which the great white veered away, wanting no trouble from scolding mother-with-child and leaving Johnny to face the music.

Johnny’s mother, #2 Daughter, was busy elsewhere with her #’s 1, 3, and 4.  Johnny, #2, survived nicely, however, so all’s as well as can be expected.

Meanwhile, the hopper has some less than pressing items with nonetheless important ramifications.  Such as:

* A few months back, Chicago’s Mayordaley II found himself eloquently defending private over government enterprise. 

“We can’t compete with the private sector. Government doesn’t have customers, they only have citizens. You know that. Many times, your relationship with your local government or state or federal government – they’re not customer related. They’re going to leave at 5:00 p.m., and they’re going to leave at 4:30 p.m. or 4:00 p.m. ‘I’m sorry, we’re on the time clock.’ They walk out. In the private sector, when you have a customer, you’re going to stay there and make sure they’re happy and satisfied.”

He will take any position that advances his agenda, in this case selling off (leasing for 99 years) a municipal asset (Midway Airport) to raise money to keep his allegedly bloated and inefficient enterprise going.  So there was the Mayor of Chicago making a pretty good case for not looking to government for help.

But he didn’t mean that at all, he said the next day, in a classic display of doubletalk:

Instead of apologizing for offending city employees, Daley said his remarks had been taken out of context.

“I said that some people just watch the clock — government workers or anybody else — and leave,” Daley said. “But here in Chicago, we’re fortunate that people just don’t watch the clock.”

He played the good-natured wounded public official:

“I never said city workers of … Chicago are not good workers. Would you correct that for me? I know it’s hard because I’m a ping-pong ball for the media. If you don’t have the Daley name, I guess they don’t read the newspapers. But just correct that … Don’t misinterpret what I say to try to bring confrontation against city workers. That’s really unfair.”

As for his own people:

“City workers work hard. I talked about the city in a positive way. But you’re trying to follow me in a negative way so you have people yelling at me. I know that’s your gig. But be responsible.”

Isn’t he reasonable?

It hadn’t helped any that the Chicago Federation of Labor president had taken his own umbrage:

Dennis Gannon said he was offended by the mayor’s remarks because of the “sacrifices” city workers make every day to get Chicago through another brutal winter.

“At 3 a.m., we’ve got guys making sure the streets are safe and sound for citizens trying to get to work,” Gannon said. “Firemen were out at Holy Name. When you had that huge water main break on the North Side, they didn’t care about the clock. They were there to do a job for taxpayers.

“There are hard-working people doing more work today than they’ve ever done because of the downsizing of government. I know a lot of city workers. They’re my friends. I grew up with them. I know how hard they work and how dedicated they are.”

And in the background, violins.

More more more later, but as Porky Pig said, th-th-th-that’s all for now.