Gay priests and more

Am returning The Rite of Sodomy: Homosexuality and the Roman Catholic Church to OP Library, which got it for me from the Oak Lawn Library.  It’s a 1,282–page stunner, both in intensity — fascinating in sense that watching a car wreck is fascinating — and shock effect.

Almost 13 years ago, I stood in the old Kroch’s & Brentano’s on Lake Street in Oak Park and brought the store to complete silence with the mention of “gay priests.”  I was at a mike in the rear of the store facing 40 or so people who were there to hear me talk about my just published Bending the Rules: What American Priests Tell American Catholics

I was saying how I’d run across reference to the phenomenon while interviewing for my book.  Priests had mentioned their being out of the gay loop among fellow priests.  Bishop Bill McManus had told me he knew of gay priests who kept their vows and did good work.

But the very concept had quieted book buyers on a summer night.  Now we have heard much about it, even from the head U.S. bishop a few years back, and I have written about it.  And there’s this book, about which more later . . .

Charlie Madigan, fie!

Open letter to Charles Madigan @ Chi Trib: Dear Charlie, I am simultaneously shocked and depressed (not a good situation) at your distancing yourself from genteel people today in re: divorce, Newt Gingrich, the Clintons, etc.:

I’m seeing lots of marriages marked by some pretty embarrassing divorces, behaviors the genteel would call “scandalous” and a bushel basket of unvarnished chutzpah.

“The genteel would call ‘scandalous,’” you say? But aren’t you among them? Depression followed shock at this revelation, as I say above. Fie!

In a lesser matter, confession is best a private matter, Charlie. You are right about that.  But what’s this giving the Battling Clintons a pass? Momentarily putting yourself beyond the pale of the genteel is one thing, but naivete? Inexcusable in a hardboiled newsman.

“We don’t really know, do we?” you say about their marriage being for show. Right.

We do really know, however, that Bill got his forgiveness, or at least “counselling,” from a certain Rev. Jackson as stuff was hitting the fan, as has many another Democrat.

My apologies, Charlie. Can’t do this thing justice. Am running off to confession. In the unlikely event that I announce my sins, you will be the first to hear.

Sincerely,

Jim

Curious and curiouser in today’s papers

* Surprise firestorm over morality statement by Gen. Pace, chairman of chiefs of staff?

[W]hat was striking was the awkward thud [Pace’s] words made as they hit the floor in the broader court of public opinion

Writer Rex W. Huppke is surprised here or plays dumb. This broader court?

Politicians, including several high-profile Republicans, spoke up, . . . . . Many Americans found Pace’s words as dated as they were inappropriate, a sad echo from an unenlightened past.

How many? We do not know. But H. welcomes the “backlash” and turns to – guess whom? – Rick Garcia,

political director of the gay rights group Equality Illinois, who says, “I think we are at that tipping point where, increasingly, you can’t use anti-gay slurs. Anti-gay slurs are being put in the same category as racial and ethnic epithets.”

Slurs?

a) most papers wouldn’t even run “faggot” when reporting Ozzie Guillen’s attack on a columnist. At tipping point, hardly. We have tipped.

b) The general said gay sex is immoral: that’s a slur? To Garcia, of course, but also to Huppke, apparently.

People will believe what they want and justify it, as Pace did, by saying it’s how they were raised or pinning their feelings on religious tenets.

Beware religious tenets.

The general is a public figure, though, and when he spoke last week, he was not asked to share his personal view.

Way at the end, H. gets to the point, admitted by Pace afterward: his purview is policy, not morality.

But in today’s climate, it was refreshing to hear him address the morality part. And it’s not a good sign when a Chi Trib reporter betrays his own bias in this fashion. Doesn’t suprise us, but we’d like a really real surprise now and then, would we not?

* Semi-full description of knifer is good enough for Chi Trib as i-d in all points bulletin in case of Edgewater stabbings:

a man in his early 20s, standing 5-foot-6 to 5-foot-8, weighing 140 to 150 pounds, with a light complexion and dark-brown eyes.

But Sun-Times breaks the news. The guy is “Hispanic.”

* Driver missing, SUV to blame for death, injuries:

[A man] was killed and eight others were injured when an SUV plowed through the Subway’s picture window . . .

No alcohol was found in the vehicle and an investigation is under way . . .

That’s it, except info about the victims.  So the SUV had not been drinking.  Did it have a driver?

History lesson from defeated general

From Reader Ed, who got it from his friend Bill:

“It appears we have appointed our worst generals to command forces, and
our most gifted and brilliant to edit newspapers! In fact, I discovered
by reading newspapers that these editor/geniuses plainly saw all my
strategic defects from the start, yet failed to inform me until it was
too late. Accordingly, I’m readily willing to yield my command to these
obviously superior intellects, and I’ll, in turn, do my best for the
Cause by writing editorials – after the fact.”

Robert E. Lee, 1863

Patience worn out, revived somehow

Joseph’s brothers sell him passing caravan, coming from Gilead with gum, balm, and resin, heading for Egypt.  They would have already drowned him in a well if one of them, Reuben, hadn’t intervened.  Their beef against Joseph, the youngest of them, was that their father, Israel, liked him best.  They also resented him personally, as a “dreamer.”  This was sibling rivalry to the Nth degree.  It’s in Genesis 37.

In Matthew 21, on the other hand, we have the vintner patiently sending his agents to the tenants, who killed or manhandled them, one group after another, including the vintner’s sons!  We may ask what the vintner was thinking next time they won’t do that, until his family is half wiped out?  It’s a story, of course, told by Jesus to show God’s patience with his people.  No more, as in the story, he says, and the chief priests and pharisees got the message.  Like Joseph’s brothers, they would have did him in, but held back because of his popular support.

The 105th Psalm recalls or tells us that Joseph, “sold as a slave” in chains, was avenged by “the Lord,” who “called down a famine on the land” and ruined their crops.  The sequence of readings (Lent 2, Friday, C-cycle) places the Christian God in stark contrast to the pre-Jesus God.  Same God, but changed somehow, and that’s to be explained in the coming Lenten and Passiontide readings.

————-

Later, Reader Phil gives retort simple:

If there were such a thing as Taliban catholics you would probably be a marked man for mentioning Reuben and beef during Lent.

To which I:

If you caught that, how many others did?  Oy vey.

Two with one blow

Hey, good news out of Iraq from Chi Trib:

BAGHDAD — The U.S. Army has reported a sharp decrease in insurgency attacks in Baghdad.

In the week of Feb. 24 to March 2, officials said, insurgency strikes and suicide bombings dropped for the fourth consecutive week in Baghdad. They linked this to the steady increase of security patrols in the city.

Oops, scratch that.  World Trib there.  Chi Trib has this:

To Iraq’s Sunnis, Iran’s ascendancy as a regional power and its close relationship with the Shiite-led government represent a pernicious threat to the survival of Iraq’s Arab identity.

“America handed Iraq to Iran on a golden plate,” says Sunni politician Saleh al-Mutlaq. “Everything Iran fought for in the Iran-Iraq war, America gave to it when it invaded.”

That’s on page one today, top left, by Liz Sly.  No, it’s not the lede.  This is the soft-led Trib, remember.  The lede was about legislature cafeteria mumblings in “Persian” (she means Farsi?) and an Iranian charity that buys wedding dresses and arms caches seized from insurgents.

So in one story you have two characteristics of Chi Trib coverage: bad news out of Iraq and soft lede-ism.

Fitzg goofed? Bush flunks?

Novak’s two concluding paragraphs say a lot about the Libby verdict.  “No underlying criminal violation,” but Fitzg went ahead?  Looks like scalp-hunting to me:

On Fox’s “Hannity & Colmes” Tuesday night, super-lawyer David Boies said Fitzgerald never should have prosecuted Libby because there was no underlying criminal violation. Boies scoffed at Fitzgerald’s contention that Libby had obstructed him from exposing criminal activity. Boies, who represented Al Gore in the 2000 election dispute, is hardly a Bush sympathizer. But neither is he a Democratic partisan trying to milk this obscure scandal.

As for GW, Novak is good at not letting him off the hook: 

George W. Bush lost control of this issue when he permitted a special prosecutor to make decisions that, unlike going after a drug dealer or mafia kingpin, turned out to be inherently political. It would have taken courage for the president to have aborted this process. It would require even more courage for him to pardon Scooter Libby now, not while he is walking out of the White House in January 2009.

NOT Puerto Rican gangsters!

Returning to the gang members who jumped the off-duty cop on Lincoln Ave. after a 4 a.m. bar closing, not identified ethnically by Sun-Times and erroneously presumed in this space to be Puerto Rican, they’re white non-Latino, as is clear from their names — Vincent Munday, David Podgorski and brothers Anthony Borias, Nicholas Borias and Joseph Borias (maybe Latin) — and headshots. 

The gang is Insane Deuces (alleged, allegedly and other kind of disclaimer for all this; it’s how newspapers protect selves, why not members of the Insane Bloggers gang?), one of whose members recently shot and killed a Marine home on leave.  One of the Lincoln Avenue Five is an Elmwood Park High School graduate — that town is kitty-corner from Oak Park at Harlem & North.

This town has its toughies.  I wandered into it now and then on walks from our northeast River Forest rental a few years back.  One quiet Sunday about 8 a.m., I sauntered down the strip mall near Harlem & North, west of the bank on the corner across the street from a Sears store on the Chicago corner (NE).  Noticing that the Great American Bagels was closed for redecorating, etc. — it’s when they absorbed an ice cream operation from next door — I stopped to look inside. 

I was immediately accosted by a tough young man whose accomplice stood at my rear.  We remained jocular with each other as I, blessedly unaware, wondered out loud what was up with the Bagels place.  The two and another were standing outside (guarding?) a late-model auto parked across a small parking lot in which sat (huddled?) an elderly couple.  Taking the couple at first to be mob-related, I was the more cautious. 

But my happy-go-luckiness worked in dealing with the two bully boys, who stood aside as I continued my stroll.  Confused, I guessed the two oldsters were being held, say until ransom was paid?  Lively imagination I had, you say.  But regaining the River Forest side of North Avenue, I looked back.  The wise guys and the oldsters remained in place.  I considered calling 911 but didn’t, feeling uncertain of my ground in Elmwood Park matters.  It’s culturally another world over there.  I turned and continued back to our Bonnie Brae quarters.