LINING UP against LIGHTFOOT — LINCOLN YARDS curve ball — J.B. and LORI meet for dinner – POLITICO

Mayor Lori urges something she does not want:

She called for “a transparent and fulsome subject matter hearing to address questions including consequences for other TIF districts, affordable housing options, plans for minority- and women-owned businesses, and impacts on diversity, population density, schools, traffic, and other factors.”

Do see the problem? If not, look up fulsome:

offensive to good taste, especially as being excessive; overdone or gross: fulsome praise that embarrassed her deeply; fulsome décor.

disgusting; sickening; repulsive: a table heaped with fulsome mounds of greasy foods.

excessively or insincerely lavish: fulsome admiration.

(Unless she means “abundant or copious,” #5 of 5 approved usages.)

RELATED WORDS are no help:

bombastic, buttery, canting, cloying, coarse, extravagant, fawning, flattering, glib, grandiloquent, hypocritical, immoderate, ingratiating, inordinate, insincere, magniloquent, mealy-mouthed, nauseating, offensive, oily

Please. No more of such talk. We have come to expect more from the pride of Massilon.

Virginia vs. Texas Tech: The Ugliest National Championship Ever – WSJ

Lede of the week about finalists who block scoring with zest and fury:

MINNEAPOLIS—Twelve years ago at the Minnesota State Fairgrounds, just a few miles from where the men’s Final Four is taking place, a bull broke loose. It charged about a block through the crowded grounds, miraculously missing all fairgoers. Then it lowered its head, took aim at a fire hydrant and rammed it, dying instantly.

No death in the afternoon in this case, or at night time either, however.

Chicago mayor-elect Lori Lightfoot’s next challenge

Greg Hinz of Crain’s gives advice to new mayor, letting the left hand know what the right is doing, you might say, including getting the city out of its “fiscal pinch” by various practices that “job creators” can stomach.

“The socialists [newly ensconced aldermen] won’t like it,” he says.

But then, they won’t like it as long as there are any “rich” people left to tax. Lightfoot will be walking on a fiscal balance beam in months to come. Here’s hoping she makes it across and doesn’t fall off. [Italics added]

Yes. Where would socialists be without rich people?

Economic Models Predict BIG Trump 2020 Win – Conservative Intelligence Briefing

More reliable than climate change models, I trust.

On Thursday, Politico ran a story detailing how several economic models with a history of accuracy predict a win for Trump in 2020:

“[I[f the election were held today, he’d likely ride to a
second term in a huge landslide, according to multiple economic
models with strong track records of picking presidential winners
and losses.

“Credit a strong U.S. economy featuring low unemployment,
rising wages and low gas prices — along with the historic
advantage held by incumbent presidents.”

The economy, s—-d.

“‘Even if you have a mediocre but not great economy—and that’s
more or less consensus for between now and the election—that has
a Trump victory and by a not-trivial margin,’ winning 54 percent
of the popular vote to 46 for the Democrat, [Yale economist Ray
Fair] said. Fair’s model also predicted a Trump win in 2016 though it missed on Trump’s share of the popular vote.”

Fair enough.

What do we think about this? Jobs, jobs, jobs . . .

Beats socialism any day.

Key Points

  • The number of Americans filing applications for unemployment benefits dropped to a more than 49-year low last week.
  • The data pointed to sustained labor market strength despite slowing economic growth.
  • Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped to 202,000 for the week ended March 30, the lowest level since early December 1969, the Labor Department said.

Could this have something to do with how the current administration operates? Somehow I think so. And hope against hope that it’s getting wide coverage in the nation’s newspapers, etc. tomorrow. I can hope, can’t I?

America’s socialist surge is going strong in Chicago | Micah Uetricht | Opinion | The Guardian

Thunder from the (far) left, warning about Tuesday’s big, big winner.

Lightfoot claimed to be a progressive, but her record has been scrutinized by criminal justice activists and the CTU (which backed Lightfoot’s opponent, Cook county board president Toni Preckwinkle); she drew a large donation from a murky “dark money” group that uses vague pro-austerity rhetoric as well as support from Emanuel’s personal lawyer. The city’s labor movement and left will probably find themselves joining together to fight Lightfoot in office.

Isn’t that a blessing?

Chicago’s socialist victories [Tuesday] night weren’t a fluke. Throughout the country, people are tired of low wages, soaring housing costs, privatization of public goods, budget cuts and corporate giveaways of public money. They have tried austerity and found it miserable.

If Chicago’s elections are any indication, maybe they’re ready to try socialism.

Isn’t it nice to know our socialist friends have our back, in these perilous times?

The Chi-based author of this keen, gloom- and intensity- filled analysis:

  • Micah Uetricht is the managing editor of Jacobin magazine. He is the author of Strike for America: Chicago Teachers Against Austerity (Verso, 2014) and a member of the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America

You were looking to the most hope-filled reform effort since Anton Cermak? (Heh) Forget that. Roll up your sleeves, comrades. The revolution has not yet happened.