She gives classic response to its role, to interpret laws per the Constitution, missing it completely.

Im worried about how the justices can properly debate same-sex marriage when some dont even seem to realize that most Americans use the word gay now instead of homosexual; when Chief Justice John Roberts thinks gays are merely concerned with marriage as a desirable label, and when Justice Samuel Alito compares gay marriage to cellphones.

In this she is typical. It’s just that she so vividly exemplifies the wishy-washy thinking of the pop intelligentsia, the nation’s opinion-influencers, if not -makers.